Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 2024 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907097

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the standard treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), obtaining favorable results but associating high morbidity and mortality rates. This study assesses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a radical approach for small (< 2 cm) nonfunctioning pNETs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2017 to June 2023, 20 patients with small pNETs underwent SBRT in an IRB-approved study. Endpoints included local control, tolerance, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Diagnostic assessments comprised endoscopy, CT scans, OctreScan or PET-Dotatoc, abdominal MRI, and histological confirmatory samples. RESULTS: In a 30-month follow-up of 20 patients (median age 55.5 years), SBRT was well-tolerated with no grade > 2 toxicity. 40% showed morphological response, 55% remained stable. Metabolically, 50% achieved significant improvement. With a median OS of 41.5 months, all patients were alive without local or distant progression or need for surgical resection. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a feasible and well-tolerated approach for small neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors, demonstrating effective local control. Further investigations are vital for validation and extension of these findings.

2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(4): 882-896, abr. 2023.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-217749

ABSTRACT

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Radiosurgery/methods
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(4): 897-911, abr. 2023.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-217750

ABSTRACT

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a status of cancer that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While imaging diagnostic tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still escape from current detection techniques allowing disease to progress. The variety of OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of an early disease control. Based on increasing detection rates of OMD in the current real clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies may translate into promising treatment options. This experts’ review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Breast Cancer (Part I), and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework that might contribute to the improved management of patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Colorectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(4): 897-911, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525230

ABSTRACT

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a status of cancer that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While imaging diagnostic tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still escape from current detection techniques allowing disease to progress. The variety of OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of an early disease control. Based on increasing detection rates of OMD in the current real clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies may translate into promising treatment options. This experts' review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Breast Cancer (Part I), and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework that might contribute to the improved management of patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Colorectal Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Male , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Medical Oncology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiosurgery/methods
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(4): 882-896, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525231

ABSTRACT

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Male , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Medical Oncology , Radiosurgery/methods
6.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 151: 102967, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32450277

ABSTRACT

We report on the second Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer which was held under the auspices of the European Society for RadioTherapy & Oncology (ESTRO). In discussing in-depth current evidence and practice it was designed to identify grey areas in diverse forms of the disease. It aimed at addressing uncertainties and proposing future trials to improve patient care. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) primary systemic therapy, mastectomy, breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation therapy, 2) therapeutic options in ductal carcinoma in situ, and 3) therapy de-escalation in early stage breast cancer. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. The time lapse period between the survey and the meeting was used to review the literature and on-going clinical trials. At the ATTM both were discussed in depth and research protocols were proposed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Mastectomy/methods , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
7.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 70(6): 474-486, jun. 2017. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-163305

ABSTRACT

Los avances en la detección precoz y el tratamiento del cáncer han reducido de manera significativa la mortalidad de los pacientes. Sin embargo, mejorar el pronóstico no es solo curar el tumor, sino prevenir, diagnosticar y tratar eficazmente las complicaciones derivadas de las terapias onco-hematológicas. La toxicidad cardiovascular es un problema ampliamente reconocido con múltiples esquemas terapéuticos; sin embargo, la evidencia científica en el manejo de las complicaciones cardiovasculares de pacientes onco-hematológicos es escasa, pues sistemáticamente se ha excluido de los ensayos clínicos a estos enfermos y las recomendaciones actuales están basadas en consensos de expertos. Es imprescindible crear equipos multidisciplinarios locales para optimizar los resultados en salud de los supervivientes al cáncer. Una preocupación excesiva por la aparición de toxicidad cardiovascular puede impedir terapias potencialmente curativas, mientras que la subestimación de este riesgo compromete el pronóstico vital a largo plazo. El objetivo de este documento, elaborado en colaboración con la Sociedad Española de Cardiología, la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, la Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica y la Sociedad Española de Hematología, es actualizar los conocimientos aplicables a la práctica clínica diaria de la cardio-onco-hematología y promover el desarrollo de equipos multidisciplinarios locales que mejoren la salud cardiovascular de los pacientes con cáncer (AU)


Improvements in early detection and treatment have markedly reduced cancer-related mortality. However survival not only depends on effectively cure cancer, but prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related complications is also needed. Cardiovascular toxicity is a widespread problem across many classes of therapeutic schemes, however scientific evidence in the management of cardiovascular complications of onco-hematological patients is scarce, as these patients have been systematically excluded from clinical trials and current recommendations are based on expert consensus. Multidisciplinary teams are mandatory to decrease morbidity and mortality from both cardiotoxicity and cancer itself. An excessive concern for the occurrence of cardiovascular toxicity, can avoid potentially curative therapies, while underestimating this risk, increases long-term mortality of cancer survivors. The objective of this consensus document, developed in collaboration of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology and the Spanish Society of Hematology, is to update the necessary concepts and expertise on cardio-onco-hematology that enable its application in daily clinical practice and to promote the development of local multidisciplinary teams, to improve the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Cardiotoxicity/epidemiology , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Patient Care Team/trends
8.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 70(6): 474-486, 2017 Jun.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28330818

ABSTRACT

Improvements in early detection and treatment have markedly reduced cancer-related mortality. However survival not only depends on effectively cure cancer, but prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related complications is also needed. Cardiovascular toxicity is a widespread problem across many classes of therapeutic schemes, however scientific evidence in the management of cardiovascular complications of onco-hematological patients is scarce, as these patients have been systematically excluded from clinical trials and current recommendations are based on expert consensus. Multidisciplinary teams are mandatory to decrease morbidity and mortality from both cardiotoxicity and cancer itself. An excessive concern for the occurrence of cardiovascular toxicity, can avoid potentially curative therapies, while underestimating this risk, increases long-term mortality of cancer survivors. The objective of this consensus document, developed in collaboration of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology and the Spanish Society of Hematology, is to update the necessary concepts and expertise on cardio-onco-hematology that enable its application in daily clinical practice and to promote the development of local multidisciplinary teams, to improve the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Consensus , Hematology/standards , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/standards , Humans
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32095563

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of low doses of radiation therapy for symptomatic splenomegaly in malignant and benign diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 5 patients with symptomatic splenomegaly were treated with low doses of radiation in our centre (January 2008-December 2016). 4/5 patients had malignant neoplasia (acute myeloid leukemia, non Hogdkin lymphoma and prolymphocytic B cell leukemia) and splenomegaly was caused by extramedullary hematopoiesis. 1/5 patient had benign disease (HBV liver cirrhosis) and splenomegaly was caused by vascular ectasia. Median age was 73 years (range 61-86 years). There were 4 females and 1 male. These patients had exclusively splenic pain or abdominal discomfort in 20%, exclusively cytopenias 40% and both 40%. Patients needed radiation therapy for symptomatic control. Dose per fraction was 0.5 Gy every two days; total dose initially prescribed 10 Gy. IGRT were performed in all patients to ensure an appropriate position and to adapt the treatment volume to the changes in the spleen volume along the treatment. Median craneocaudal length size of the spleen was more than 26 cm (range 15.2-34.9 cm). RESULTS: Median radiation doses were 4.85 Gy (range 2.5-10). Median craneocaudal spleen size reduction was 4.6 cm (0-8 cm). Splenic pain and abdominal disturbances improved in all patients. Median increase of haemoglobin and platelets levels was 1.6 mg/dl and 27.950 cells respectively in the first week after the end of radiotherapy.One patient had to interrupt her treatment due to grade II neutropenia. No other toxicities were described. With a median follow-up of 39 months (16-89 months), only one recurrence was described at 24 months and consisted of thrombocytopenia. The patient received a second course of radiotherapy with excellent response. CONCLUSION: Low doses of radiation therapy for treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly were effective, with a low rate of side effects. Splenic pain and abdominal discomfort completely improved and cytopenias rised to secure levels.

11.
Rev. senol. patol. mamar. (Ed. impr.) ; 26(4): 138-145, oct.-dic. 2013.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-117225

ABSTRACT

La radioterapia en el cáncer de mama se ha empleado desde hace más de 100 años para el control local de la enfermedad. Las mejoras tecnológicas incorporadas en los últimos 20-30 años han optimizado estos resultados de control local y han conseguido aumentar la supervivencia global (nivel de evidencia 1, en el metaanálisis de Oxford). Realizamos un breve recuerdo histórico de los avances que han cambiado la práctica clínica de la radioterapia en el cáncer de mama, desde las 2 dimensiones a las 3 dimensiones con la incorporación de la tomografía axial computarizada para la simulación virtual, los conceptos de volúmenes de tratamiento, órganos de riesgo, histogramas dosis-volumen y el objetivo de distribución homogénea de la dosis absorbida entre el 95 y el 107%. Las mejoras tecnológicas en las unidades de tratamiento, desde la cobaltoterapia a los aceleradores con multiláminas automáticos con colimación de los haces hasta 5 mm en un tiempo récord, acortando los tiempos de tratamiento y la protección exquisita de los órganos de riesgo, como el pulmón y el corazón. Describiremos las generalidades de las técnicas de radioterapia en el cáncer de mama, la inmovilización en supino y en prono, la posición y volúmenes de tratamiento, la calidad de la radiación, técnica y dosis recomendadas. Mencionaremos también los nuevos fraccionamientos, que están irrumpiendo en la práctica clínica asistencial de la radioterapia del cáncer de mama, con un nivel de evidencia suficiente, con resultados en control local, supervivencia, estéticos y de toxicidad similares a los del fraccionamiento de 2 Gy en 25 fracciones (AU)


Radiation therapy in breast cancer has been used for more than a century for local disease control. Improved technology in the last 20-30 years has maximized outcomes not only in achieving local control but also in increasing overall survival (level 1 evidence in an Oxford meta-analysis). We present a brief historical review of all the technical and scientific advances that have changed clinical practice in breast cancer radiotherapy. These include the switch from 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional technology with the use of computed tomography for virtual simulation, the new concepts of treatment volumes, organs at risk and dose-volume histograms, and the objective of a homogeneous distribution of the absorbed dose of between 95% and 107%. Technological advances in treatment units, from cobalt therapy to accelerators with MLC leaves with beam collimation of up to 5 mm in record time have shortened treatment times and provide exquisite protection to at-risk organs, such as the heart or lung. We describe the general features of radiation therapy techniques in breast cancer, including immobilization in supine and prone positions, the position and volumes of treatment, the quality of radiation, the technique, and recommended doses. We also mention the new dose fractions that are breaking into the clinical practice of breast cancer radiotherapy, with a considerable level of evidence showing good results in terms of local control, survival rates, and esthetic outcomes, as well as toxic effects very similar to those achieved with the standard dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation/classification , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/history , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/trends
12.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 10(2): 102-10, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18258509

ABSTRACT

The clinical research developed in specialised centres and oncologic cooperative groups has permitted various scientific societies to collect recommendations used in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and incorporate them into clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Some studies have been conducted in diverse healthcare ambits to assess the influence of CPG. This revision of the medical literature analyses the impact that healthcare management -centralised or otherwise- and clinical practice in conformity with CPG have on the clinical outcome variables of STS. Eight CPG have been identified, as well as 12 conformity studies or audits. These conformity studies and audits demonstrate that the grade of adaptation of medical interventions with CPG, medical healthcare in reference centres and procedures of referrals to these centres, as well as the process of organising healthcare teams into Sarcoma Committees, have a significant influence on clinical outcome. We can conclude that excellent healthcare of STS implies the adaptation of healthcare practice to CPG, the existence of Reference Centres guided by Sarcoma Committees, and the observance of strict referral procedures within the Healthcare Area.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma/therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/therapy , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...