Pulse-train versus single-pulse t-EMG stimulation for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the PTS method in neuromonitoring of thoracic pedicle screws in a young cohort of AIS patients. The accuracy of both PTS (Pulse-train stimulation) and SPS (Single-pulse stimulation) techniques in the detection of misplaced thoracic screws was compared with special reference to the screws placed at the concavity and the convexity of the curve. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective clinical cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Twelve AIS patients who underwent elective surgery were included in this study. Screw stimulation using repetitive constant-current stimulus train of variable intensities was first performed after screw insertion. SPS was performed immediately after PTS. Postoperatively, CT scan was used to check the final position of the screws. A total of 246 thoracic pedicle screws were placed. Thresholds of screws placed in the convexity and the concavity were compared. RESULTS: Invasion of the spinal canal was postoperatively confirmed in 29 of the pedicle screws. The SPS technique detected three (10.3%) of these screws using a threshold limit of 12 mA. The PTS technique detected 25 (86.2%) of the 29 misplaced screws using threshold of 30 mA (negative predictive value, 93.1%). When using a PTS threshold of < 20 mA, the positive predictive value was 70%. SPS did not detect any of the misplaced screws at the apex level of the scoliotic curves, and PTS detected 10 out of 17 of these screws. Overall, area under the ROC curve was 0.82 for PTS and 0.61 for SPS. CONCLUSIONS: PTS is a reliable method for detecting medially misplaced screws among young AIS patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. PTS provides more accurate predictions than SPS and improves the identification of screws invading the spinal canal at the apex or near the apex levels.

A pilot study on the impact of a pottery workshop on the well-being of people with dementia.

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to assess the impact of a pottery workshop as a creative arts programme and discover the extent to which people with dementia taking part in an artistic and creative activity engage with it, experience a feeling of well-being, and improve their mood state. In addition, the study will seek to answer the question of whether taking part in a programme of creative activities improves the self-esteem of people with dementia. METHOD: The research used an uncontrolled, repeated measures design. Thirty users of the National Reference Centre for Alzheimer's and Dementia care in Salamanca (Spain) in a moderate to advanced stage of dementia (Global Deterioration Scale 4, 5, or 6) were divided into five intervention groups that received ten 45-minute sessions in which they were helped by facilitators to make different ceramic pieces. The participants were assessed before and after the intervention with a self-esteem scale, and they rated their mood before and after the sessions on a graphic scale. During the art sessions, two observers recorded the presence of multiple indicators of well-being. RESULTS: The intervention was found to have a significant impact on mood and self-esteem that was independent of the participants' Global Deterioration Scale. Regarding the tool used to observe well-being, the participants scored highly in the domains of sustained attention, pleasure, self-esteem, and normalcy, with low scores in negative affect and sadness. CONCLUSIONS: Pottery may be a highly suitable activity for people with dementia, as they may enjoy both the activity and the creative process, with it triggering a positive mood during the sessions, providing psychological well-being and reinforcing their self-esteem.

Neurophysiological monitoring during acute and progressive experimentally induced compression injury of the spinal cord in pigs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of acute or progressive lateral compression needed to cause neurologic injury to the spinal cord assessed by electrophysiological monitoring. METHODS: In five domestic pigs, the spinal cord was exposed and compressed between T8-T9 roots using a precise compression device. Two sticks placed on both sides of the spinal cord were sequentially brought together (0.5 mm every 2 min), causing progressive spinal cord compression. Acute compression was reproduced by a 2.5-mm displacement of the sticks. Cord-to-cord evoked potentials were obtained with two epidural catheters. RESULTS: Increasing latency and decreasing amplitude of the evoked potentials were observed after a mean progressive displacement of the sticks of 3.2 ± 0.9 mm, disappearing after a mean displacement of 4.6 ± 1.2 mm. The potential returned after compression removal (16.8 ± 3.2 min). The potentials disappeared immediately after an acute compression of 2.5 ± 0.3 mm, without any sign of recovering after 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental model replicates the mechanism of a spinal cord injury caused by medially displaced screws into the spinal canal. The spinal cord had more ability for adaptation to progressive and slow compression than to acute mechanisms.

Influence of hypotension and nerve root section on the ability to mobilize the spinal cord during spine surgery. An experimental study in a pig model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The correction of severe spinal deformities by an isolated posterior approach often involves cord manipulation together with hypotensive anesthesia. To date, the efficiency of methods to increase the tolerance of the cord to displacement and the influence of hypotension on this tolerance is yet to be assessed. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the limits of cord displacement before the disappearance of neurophysiologic signals. The influence of the type of force applied, the section of the roots, and the induced hypotension on the cord's tolerance to displacement was also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study using a domestic pig model. OUTCOME MEASURES: Successive records of cord-to-cord motor evoked potentials were obtained during displacement maneuvers. Displacing forces were released immediately after the absence of neurophysiologic signals. METHODS: Surgical procedures were performed under conventional general anesthesia. The spinal cord and nerve roots from T6 to T10 levels were exposed by excision of the posterior elements, allowing for free cord movement. Three groups were established according to the method of spinal cord displacement: the separation (Group 1, n=5), the root stump pull (Group 2, n=5), and the torsion groups (Group 3, n=5). An electromechanical external device was used to apply the displacing forces. The three displacement tests were repeated after sectioning the adjacent nerve roots. The experiments were first carried out under normotension and afterward under induced hypotension. RESULTS: In Group 1, evoked potential disappeared with a displacement of 10.1±1.6 mm with unharmed roots and 15.3±4.7 mm after the sectioning of four adjacent roots (p<.01). After induced hypotension, potentials were lost at 4.0±1.2 mm (p<.01). In Group 2, the absence of potentials occurred at 20.0±4.3 mm and increased to 23.5±2.1 mm (p<.05) after cutting the two contralateral roots. Under hypotensive conditions, the loss of neurophysiologic signals was detected at 5.3±1.2 mm (p<.01). In Group 3, the cord allowed torsion of 95.3±.2° that increased to 112.4±7.1° if the contralateral roots were cut. Under hypotension, the loss of potentials was found at 20±6.2° (p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental model, it was possible to displace the thoracic spinal cord by a distance superior to the spinal cord width without suffering neurophysiologic changes. The limits of cord displacement increase when the adjacent nerve roots are sacrificed. Induced hypotension had a dramatic effect on the tolerance of the spinal cord for displacement. This work has an important clinical significance because induced hypotension during specific spine surgery procedures requiring spinal cord manipulation in humans may increase the risk of neurologic spinal cord injury.

Electromyographic thresholds after thoracic screw stimulation depend on the distance of the screw from the spinal cord and not on pedicle cortex integrity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Present studies concerning the safety and reliability of neurophysiological monitoring during thoracic pedicle screw placement remain inconclusive, and therefore, universally validated threshold levels that confirm osseous breakage of the instrumented pedicles have not been properly established. PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to analyze whether electromyographic (EMG) thresholds, after stimulation of the thoracic pedicle screw, depend on the distance between the neural structures and the screws. The modifier effect of different interposed tissues between a breached pedicle and neural structures was also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: This experimental study uses a domestic pig model. METHODS: Electromyographic thresholds were recorded after the stimulation of 18 thoracic pedicle screws that had been inserted into five experimental animals using varying distances between each screw and the spinal cord (8 and 2 mm). Electromyographic thresholds were also registered after the medial pedicle cortex was broken and after different biological tissues were interposed (blood, muscle, fat, and bone) between the screw and the spinal cord. RESULTS: Mean EMG thresholds increased to 14.1±5.5 mA for screws with pedicle cortex integrity that were placed 8 mm away from the dural sac. After the medial pedicle cortex was broken and without varying the distance of the screw to the dural sac, the mean EMG thresholds were not appreciably changed (13.6±6.3 mA). After repositioning the screw at a distance of 2 mm from the spinal cord and after medial cortical breach of the pedicle, the mean threshold significantly slowed to 7.4±3.4 mA (p<.001). When the screw was placed in contact with the spinal dural sac, even lower EMG thresholds were registered (4.9±1.9, p<.001). Medial pedicle cortex rupture and the interposition of different biological tissues in experimental animals did not alter the stimulation thresholds of the thoracic pedicle screws. CONCLUSIONS: In the experimental animals, the observed electrical impedance depended on the distance of screws from the neural structures and not on the integrity of the pedicle cortex. The screw-triggered EMG technique did not reliably discriminate the presence or absence of bone integrity after pedicle screw placement. The response intensity was not related to the type of interposed tissue.

Safe pedicle screw placement in thoracic scoliotic curves using t-EMG: stimulation threshold variability at concavity and convexity in apex segments.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of nonconsecutive cases (level III evidence). OBJECTIVE: In a series of young patients with thoracic scoliosis who were treated with pedicle screw constructs, data obtained from triggered electromyography (t-EMG) screw stimulation and postoperative computed tomographic scans were matched to find different threshold limits for the safe placement of pedicle screws at the concavity (CC) and convexity (CV) of the scoliotic curves. The influence of the distance from the medial pedicle cortex to the spinal cord on t-EMG threshold intensity was also investigated at the apex segment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Whether the t-EMG stimulation threshold depends on pedicle bony integrity or on the distance to neural tissue remains elusive. Studying pedicle screws at the CC and CV at the apex segments of scoliotic curves is a good model to address this issue because the spinal cord is displaced to the CC in these patients. METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent posterior fusions using 358 pedicle thoracic screws were reviewed. All patients presented main thoracic scoliosis, with a mean Cobb angle of 58.3 degrees (range, 46-87 degrees). Accuracy of the screw placement was tested at surgery by the t-EMG technique. During surgery, 8 screws placed at the CC showed t-EMG threshold values below 7 mA and were carefully removed. Another 25 screws disclosed stimulation thresholds within the range of 7 to 12 mA. After checking the screw positions by intraoperative fluoroscopy, 15 screws were removed because of clear signs of malpositioning. Every patient underwent a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination, in which the distances from the spinal cord to the pedicles of the concave and convex sides at 3 apex vertebrae were measured. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were used in all patients to detect screw malpositioning of the final 335 screws. RESULTS: According to postoperative computed tomographic scans, 44 screws (13.1%) showed different malpositions: 40 screws (11.9%) perforated the medial pedicle wall, but only 11 screws (3.2%) were completely inside the spinal canal. If we considered the 23 screws removed during surgery, the true rate of misplaced screws increased to 18.7%. In those screws that preserved the pedicle cortex (well-positioned screws), EMG thresholds from the CC showed statistically significantly lower values than those registered at the CV of the deformity (21.1 ± 8.2 vs 23.9 ± 7.7 mA, P < 0.01). In the concave side, t-EMG threshold values under 8 mA should be unacceptable because they correspond to screw malpositioning. Threshold values above 14 mA indicate an accurate intrapedicular position with certainty. At the convex side, threshold values below 11 mA always indicate screw malpositioning, and values above 19 mA imply accurate screw placement. At the 3 apex vertebrae, the average pedicle-spinal cord distance was 2.2 ± 0.7 mm at the concave side and 9.8 ± 4.3 mm at the convex side (P < 0.001). In well-positioned screws, a correlation between pedicle-dural sac distance and t-EMG threshold values was found at the concave side only (Pearson r = 0.467, P < 0.05). None of the patients with misplaced screws showed postoperative neurological impairment. CONCLUSION: Independent of the screw position, average t-EMG thresholds were always higher at the CV in the apex and above the apex regions, presuming that the distance from the pedicle to the spinal cord plays an important role in electrical transmission. The t-EMG technique has low sensitivity to predict screw malpositioning and cannot discriminate between medial cortex breakages and complete invasion of the spinal canal.

Recording triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes: a new refined technique for accurate upper thoracic (T2-T6) pedicle screw placement.

This study was aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and safety of a new technique to record triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes when inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine (T2-T6). A total of 248 (36.6%) of a total of 677 thoracic screws were placed at the T2-T6 levels in 92 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A single electrode placed at the axillary midline was able to record potentials during surgery from all T2-T6 myotomes at each side. Eleven screws were removed during surgery because of malposition according to intraoperative fluoroscopic views. Screw position was evaluated after surgery in the remaining 237 screws using a CT scan. Malposition was detected in 35 pedicle screws (14.7%). Pedicle medial cortex was breached in 24 (10.1%). Six screws (2.5%) were located inside the spinal canal. Mean EMG threshold was 24.44 ± 11.30 mA in well-positioned screws, 17.98 ± 8.24 mA (p < 0.01) in screws violating the pedicle medial cortex, and 10.38 ± 3.33 mA (p < 0.005) in screws located inside the spinal canal. Below a threshold of 12 mA, 33.4% of the screws (10/30) were malpositioned. Furthermore, 36% of the pedicle screws with t-EMG stimulation thresholds within the range 6-12 mA were malpositioned. In conclusion, assessment of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement by recording tEMG at a single axillary electrode was highly reliable. Thresholds below 12 mA should alert surgeons to suspect screw malposition. This technique simplifies tEMG potential recording to facilitate safe placement of pedicle screws at upper thoracic levels.