ABSTRACT
The solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm, representing 0.13% to 2.7% of all pancreatic tumors. This neoplasm is more common in young women between the third and fourth decade of life. It may produce nonspecific symptoms and in many cases is asymptomatic, being diagnosed incidentally. A 28-year-old woman with no previous medical history presented epigastric pain for the last 3 months. Physical examination was normal. When an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, a submucosal lesion was observed in the posterior wall of the stomach. A computed tomography and a magnetic resonance imaging were done and both showed a 2.8 cm-diameter tumor in the body of the pancreas. She underwent a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Warshaw surgery), evolved favourably and was discharged at the sixth postoperative day. The pathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen was a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Surgery is the gold-standard treatment for this condition, given the facts that no other treatment have proven being effective and often surgical treatment is curative because of the tumor's low malignant potential.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
The solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm, representing 0.13
to 2.7
of all pancreatic tumors. This neoplasm is more common in young women between the third and fourth decade of life. It may produce nonspecific symptoms and in many cases is asymptomatic, being diagnosed incidentally. A 28-year-old woman with no previous medical history presented epigastric pain for the last 3 months. Physical examination was normal. When an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, a submucosal lesion was observed in the posterior wall of the stomach. A computed tomography and a magnetic resonance imaging were done and both showed a 2.8 cm-diameter tumor in the body of the pancreas. She underwent a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Warshaw surgery), evolved favourably and was discharged at the sixth postoperative day. The pathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen was a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Surgery is the gold-standard treatment for this condition, given the facts that no other treatment have proven being effective and often surgical treatment is curative because of the tumors low malignant potential.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
The solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm, representing 0.13
of all pancreatic tumors. This neoplasm is more common in young women between the third and fourth decade of life. It may produce nonspecific symptoms and in many cases is asymptomatic, being diagnosed incidentally. A 28-year-old woman with no previous medical history presented epigastric pain for the last 3 months. Physical examination was normal. When an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, a submucosal lesion was observed in the posterior wall of the stomach. A computed tomography and a magnetic resonance imaging were done and both showed a 2.8 cm-diameter tumor in the body of the pancreas. She underwent a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Warshaw surgery), evolved favourably and was discharged at the sixth postoperative day. The pathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen was a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Surgery is the gold-standard treatment for this condition, given the facts that no other treatment have proven being effective and often surgical treatment is curative because of the tumors low malignant potential.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatectomy , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Introducción: el duodeno representa el segundo sitio más común de desarrollo de divertículos, después del colon. Se encuentran generalmente a 2,5 cm de la ampolla de Vater o en la primera porción duodenal, en casos relativamente raros, se presentan en la tercera y cuarta porción duodenal. Objetivo: presentación de un caso de divertículo en tercera porción duodenal, así como también la metodología diagnóstica y terapéutica para resolverlo. Discusión: el diagnóstico clínico de los divertículos duodenales presenta dificultad debido a que no existe una presentación clínica característica. Sólo el 10% y 25% de los pacientes son sintomáticos. Las manifestaciones clínicas se desarrollan por las complicaciones de las diverticulitis. El diagnóstico se basa en los estudios contrastados como las seriadas esofagogastroduodenales, TAC multicorte, así como también, la realización de una endoscopía, deben contribuir a un diagnóstico acertado. El tratamiento quirúrgico de los divertículos asintomático en pacientes adultos no está justificado, mientras que en el paciente con síntomas el criterio es quirúrgico para evitar complicaciones como: hemorragia, perforación, diverticulitis, pancreatitis y obstrucción. Conclusión: el tratamiento de los divertículos duodenales varía según el tipo, localización y extensión del proceso inflamatorio. La cirugía se encuentra reservada en un 1 al 3% de los pacientes con divertículos duodenales en tercera porción, considerando aquellos enfermos con dolor abdominal persistente o complicaciones asociadas a la diverticulitis.
Introduction: The duodenum is the second most common site of diverticula development after the colon. They are usually found to 2.5 cm of the ampulla of Vater or the first part of the duodenum, in relatively rare cases, occur in the third and fourth duodenal portion. Objective: A case of duodenal diverticulum in the third portion, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic methodology to solve it. Discussion: The diagnosis of duodenal diverticula have difficulty because there is no characteristic clinical presentation. Only 10% and 25% of patients are symptomatic. The clinical manifestatiions are developed by the complications of diverticulitis. The diagnosis is bases on serial contrast studies such as upper GI, multislice CT, and also carrying out an endoscopy, should contribute to an accurate diagnosis. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic diverticula in adult patients is not justified, whereas in patients with symptoms on surgical approach is to avoid complications such as bleeding, perforation, diverticulitis, pancreatitis and obstruction. Conclusion: The treatment of duodenal diverticula varies according to the type, location and extent of the inflammatory process. Surgery is reserved on a 1 to 3% of patients with duodenal diverticula in the third portin, whereas those patients with persistent abdominal pain or complications associated with diverticulitis.