Care providers' experiences with and attitudes towards virtual antenatal care: Findings from a qualitative study in British Columbia.

Background: Virtual care has emerged as an adjunctive response to challenges in rural health care, including maternity care, and use has accelerated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This gives rise to the need for a strategic plan for post-COVID-19 virtual maternity care in rural communities. To date, no provincial initiative has focused on understanding and documenting the needs of maternity care practitioners to provide virtual care. Methods: Qualitative study, including virtual interviews and focus groups with rural primary maternity care providers and urban and rural specialists on perceptions of the utility of virtual maternity care pre- and post-COVID-19, and benefits and barriers of virtual care. Data were thematically analysed. Results: In total, 82 health care providers participated in the study. Health care provider responses fell into three categories: Attributes of virtual care, barriers to virtual care and system interventions needed to optimize the provision of virtual perinatal care. Participants expressed a desire for use of virtual communication tools post-COVID-19, continued ability to use fee codes for virtual care and a need for more secure texting options. The benefits of tripartite consultations were noted by many participants; impacts of the transition to virtual care included additional workload and interrupted workflow. Concerns over the lack of physical examinations and challenges in building relationships with patients when providing virtual care were frequently noted. Conclusion: Adapting the current implementation of virtual maternity care in British Columbia may be enhanced through several provider- and evidence-derived strategies, many of which are currently underway in BC. The results from this provincial survey will be used to focus further discussion on the characteristics of an optimal system to meet patient and provider needs within a rural context.

Patient advocacy by rural emergency physicians after major service cuts: the case of Nelson, BC.

Efforts at cost containment through regionalization have led to reduced services in several rural emergency departments (EDs) in Canada. As a result, questions have been raised about patient safety and equitable access to care, compelling physicians to advocate for their patients. Few published reports on physicians' advocacy experiences pertaining to rural EDs exist. We describe our experience of patient advocacy after major service cuts at Kootenay Lake Hospital in Nelson, BC. Despite mixed results, we suggest increased physician involvement in patient advocacy.

Clostridium septicum infection in a young pregnant patient.

This report describes a young pregnant woman who presented to a rural emergency department with vaginal bleeding at 7 weeks of gestation. Initially, the patient was stable; however, within 8 h the patient deteriorated into fulminant septic shock. She required aggressive resuscitation and surgical management of a septic abortion. The patient's condition improved rapidly following surgical evacuation of the uterus with dilatation and curettage. She has had no long-term sequelae. Blood and tissue cultures returned positive for Clostridium septicum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only reported case of survival from C septicum infection in a pregnant woman and highlights the importance of improved awareness and management of such infections by the medical community so that future cases can achieve similarly successful outcomes.

Evaluation of standard and modified severity of illness scores in the obstetric patient.

PURPOSE: To test discrimination and calibration of APACHE-II and SAPS-II risk prediction scores in a cohort of obstetric patients, and to evaluate the effect of modifying these scores for the physiological changes in pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of obstetric patients, 12 weeks gestation to 48 hours postpartum, admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hours. APACHE-II and SAPS-II, and versions modified for the physiological changes of pregnancy, were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and standardized mortality ratios (SMR). Multivariable analysis identified other parameters associated with mortality. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 332 patients from 5 countries, with a mortality rate of 12%. Mean (± SD) APACHE-II score was 16.8 ± 6.1 and SAPS-II score 26.5 ± 15.8. Good discrimination was demonstrated with area under the ROC curves of 0.82 and 0.78 respectively, with no improvement after modification for altered maternal physiology. APACHE-II overestimated mortality, with an SMR of 0.43 (0.52 after including diagnostic weighting) compared with 0.89 for SAPS-II. Bilirubin, albumin and Glasgow Coma Scale were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: APACHE-II and SAPS-II are good discriminators of illness severity and may be valuable for comparing obstetric cohorts, but APACHE-II significantly over-estimates mortality.

Does distance matter? Increased induction rates for rural women who have to travel for intrapartum care.

OBJECTIVES: Although there has been a devolution of local rural maternity services across Canada in the past 10 years in favour of regional centralization, little is known about the health outcomes of women who must travel for care. The objective of this study was to compare intervention rates and outcomes between women who live adjacent to maternity service with specialist (surgical) services and women who have to travel for this care. METHODS: The BC Perinatal Database Registry provided data for maternal and newborn outcomes by delivery hospital for 14 referral hospitals (selected across a range of 250-2500 annual deliveries) between 2000 and 2004. Three hospitals were selected for sub-analysis on the basis of almost complete capture of the satellite community population (greater than 90%) to avoid referral bias. RESULTS: Women from outside the hospital local health area (LHA) had an increased rate of induction of labour compared with women who lived within the hospital LHA. Sub-analysis by parity demonstrated that multiparous women had increased rates of induction for logistical reasons. CONCLUSION: Rural parturient women who have to travel for care are 1.3 times more likely to undergo induction of labour than women who do not have to travel. Further research is required to determine why this is the case. If it is a strategy to mitigate stress incurred due to separation from home and community, either a clinical protocol to support geographic inductions or an alternative strategy to mitigate stress is needed.