Hepatic Involvement of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Mimicking Antinuclear Antibody-Negative Autoimmune Hepatitis Diagnosed by Liver Biopsy.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is the fifth most common hematologic disorder in the United States, and its prevalence has been rising in Western countries. Among the subtypes of NHL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) mostly involves the lymph nodes, stomach, and gastrointestinal tract, whereas hepatic involvement of DLBCL is rare. On serologic testing, elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels can be observed in DLBCL; however, elevated IgG levels are mainly observed in autoimmune hepatitis. A targeted-lesion biopsy is required for the diagnosis of DLBCL. Based on a final diagnosis, the patient was treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy, including cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy (R-CHOP). Herein, we report a case of DLBCL mimicking antinuclear antibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, which was finally diagnosed as DLBCL involving the liver, and was confirmed by liver biopsy.

Genetic variation and systemic lupus erythematosus: A field synopsis and systematic meta-analysis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-systemic severe autoimmune disease which results from the irreversible loss of self-tolerance and impaired molecular responses, especially an altered interferon signature. We synthesized all meta-analyses reporting a genetic association of SLE, and further investigated their validity to discover false positive results under Bayesian methods. We executed a PubMed search to extract the respective results regarding gene polymorphisms of SLE, published until June 30th 2017 and selected a single result per genetic variant among duplicates. Among 133 significant genotype comparisons, 45 (34%) were found noteworthy under both false positive report probability (FPRP) and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP). From the meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we could confirm that all significant comparisons were noteworthy under both Bayesian approaches. Both approaches may be advantageous for determining whether the reported associations are genuine, especially for interpreting results from observational studies instead of GWAS whose significance was determined in a more strict manner. When determining results from GWAS with a p-value ranging between 0.05 and 5 × 10-8, other statistical approaches, rather than single standard significance may be beneficial. Taking into account these considerations, a proportion of meta-analyses claimed statistical significance, but these results need to be interpreted with caution.