Moxifloxacin Increases Heart Rate in Humans.

(1) Background: We assessed the effect of moxifloxacin on heart rate, and reviewed the heart rate effects of other antibiotics; (2) Methods: A total of 335 normal volunteers had 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded at multiple time points before and during treatment with moxifloxacin and with placebo in seven consecutive, thorough QT studies of crossover design; (3) Results: The average baseline heart rate across the seven studies was 61.5 bpm. The heart rate after moxifloxacin dosing was analyzed at five time points shared by all seven studies (hours 1, 2, 3, 12 and 24). The maximum mean heart rate (HR) increase for the seven studies combined was 2.4 bpm (95% CI 1.6, 3.3) at hour 2. The range of mean maximum increases among the seven studies was 2.1 to 4.3 bpm. For the seven studies combined, the increase was statistically significant at all but the 24 h time point. The maximum observed individual increase in HR was 36 bpm and the mean maximum increase was 30 ± 4.1 bpm by time point and 8 ± 6.9 bpm by subject. Many antibiotics increase HR, some several-fold more than moxifloxacin. However, clinicians and clinical investigators give little attention to this potential adverse effect in the medical literature; (4) Conclusions: The observed moxifloxacin-induced increase in HR is large enough to be clinically relevant, and it is a potentially important confounder in thorough QT studies using moxifloxacin as an active control. More attention to heart rate effects of antibiotics is warranted.

A fundamental relationship between intraventricular conduction and heart rate.

BACKGROUND: Existence of a relationship between the electrocardiographic QRS interval duration and the diurnally varying heart rate, of consistent sign and magnitude, is controversial and the relationship has not been fully characterized in normal populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the QRS-RR interval relationship in 884 Holter recordings in 410 normal subjects participating in 5 clinical trials. The slope of the linear regression of QRS on RR was positive in 93% of subjects with an average slope of 0.0125, which indicates an increase in QRS duration of 1.25msec for an increase in RR interval of 100msec. The increase was 15% larger in women than in men. Age had no significant effect on the slope. CONCLUSIONS: In two populations of normal subjects we observed a robust, direct relationship between the spontaneously changing RR interval and intraventricular conduction time represented by the duration of the QRS interval. As heart rate increases, QRS duration decreases. The change is larger in women. These observations have important physiological and clinical implications.

Automated measurements for individualized heart rate correction of the QT interval.

BACKGROUND: Subject-specific electrocardiographic QT interval correction for heart rate is often used in clinical trials with frequent electrocardiographic recordings. However, in these studies relatively few 10-s, 12-lead electrocardiograms may be available for calculating the individual correction. Highly automated QT and RR measurement tools have made it practical to measure electrocardiographic intervals on large volumes of continuous electrocardiogram data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an automated method can be used in lieu of a manual method. METHODS: In 49 subjects who completed all treatments in a four-armed crossover study we compared two methods for derivation of individualized rate-correction coefficients: manual measurement on 10-s electrocardiograms and automated measurement of QT and RR during continuous 24-h electrocardiogram recordings. The four treatments, received by each subject in a latin-square randomization sequence were placebo, moxifloxacin, and two doses of an investigational drug. RESULTS: Analysis of continuous electrocardiogram data yielded a lower standard deviation of QT:RR regression values than the manual method, though the differences were not statistically significant. The within-subject and within-treatment coefficients of variation between the manual and automated methods were not significantly different. Corrected QT values from the two methods had similar rates of true and false positive identification of moxifloxacin's QT prolonging effect. CONCLUSION: An automated method for individualized rate correction applied to continuous electrocardiogram data could be advantageous in clinical trials, as the automated method is simpler, is based upon a much larger volume of data, yields similar results, and requires no human over-reading of the measurements.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover, definitive QT study of the effects of APF530 exposure, high-dose intravenous granisetron, and moxifloxacin on QTc prolongation.

BACKGROUND: Regulatory concern about potential QT-interval prolongation by serotonin-receptor antagonist antiemetics prompted product-label changes. The first-generation serotonin-receptor antagonist granisetron is available in oral (PO), intravenous (IV), and transdermal formulations. APF530 is a formulation that provides sustained release of granisetron when administered as a single subcutaneous (SC) injection. The Phase I study reported here evaluated effects of APF530 on electrocardiographic intervals. METHODS: This single-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover trial randomized healthy men and women to receive varying sequences of APF530 1 g SC, granisetron 50 µg/kg IV, moxifloxacin 400 mg PO, and placebo. Subjects were assessed for 49 hours after each treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate differences between baseline-adjusted, heart rate-corrected QT-interval change using the Fridericia rate correction (dQTcF) for APF530 1 g SC and placebo. Electrocardiograms were performed at various times throughout the assessment period. Pharmacokinetics and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: The upper one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean baseline-adjusted dQTcF at each post-dose time point between APF530 and placebo excluded 10 ms, indicating that APF530 1 g SC had no clinically significant effect on QTcF. Maximum observed QTcF change was 4.15 ms (90% CI, 0.94 to 7.36) at Hour 3. No clinically significant changes in other electrocardiogram intervals were observed. APF530 SC pharmacokinetics were as expected, with slow absorption (maximum plasma concentration 35.8 ng/mL, median time to maximum plasma concentration 11.1 hours) and slow elimination (mean half-life 18.6 hours; systemic clearance 20.2 L/hour) of granisetron versus the expected early peak concentration and elimination of granisetron IV. APF530 SC was well tolerated. Adverse events, most commonly constipation and SC injection-site reactions, were generally mild and quickly resolved. CONCLUSION: APF530 1 g SC did not induce clinically significant QTcF interval prolongation or changes in the other electrocardiogram intervals, and was well tolerated at twice the recommended dose.

Use and cardiovascular safety of transdermal and other granisetron preparations in cancer management.

5-HT3 antagonists have been available as oral and intravenous preparations for decades. The availability more recently of transdermal granisetron and the anticipated availability of a subcutaneous granisetron preparation have provided helpful alternatives to patients, and these preparations have been shown to have less potential to prolong QT than other drugs in the class.

Pharmacokinetics and repolarization effects of intravenous and transdermal granisetron.

PURPOSE: The need for greater clarity about the effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists on cardiac repolarization is apparent in the changing product labeling across this therapeutic class. This study assessed the repolarization effects of granisetron, a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetic, administered intravenously and by a granisetron transdermal system (GTDS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a parallel four-arm study, healthy subjects were randomized to receive intravenous granisetron, GTDS, placebo, or oral moxifloxacin (active control). The primary endpoint was difference in change from baseline in mean Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) between GTDS and placebo (ddQTcF) on days 3 and 5. RESULTS: A total of 240 subjects were enrolled, 60 in each group. Adequate sensitivity for detection of QTc change was shown by a 5.75 ms lower bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for moxifloxacin versus placebo at 2 hours postdose on day 3. Day 3 ddQTcF values varied between 0.2 and 1.9 ms for GTDS (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 6.88 ms), between -1.2 and 1.6 ms for i.v. granisetron (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 5.86 ms), and between -3.4 and 4.7 ms for moxifloxacin (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 13.45 ms). Day 5 findings were similar. Pharmacokinetic-ddQTcF modeling showed a minimally positive slope of 0.157 ms/(ng/mL), but a very low correlation (r = 0.090). CONCLUSION: GTDS was not associated with statistically or clinically significant effects on QTcF or other electrocardiographic variables. This study provides useful clarification on the effect of granisetron delivered by GTDS on cardiac repolarization.

Oritavancin, a new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic: results from a thorough QT study.

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with broad activity against gram-positive bacteria. To exclude an effect on cardiac repolarization, oritavancin was studied in a thorough QT study. In vitro assays have demonstrated a 10-fold safety margin between the concentration that resulted in 50% block of the cardiac potassium current and therapeutic plasma levels in patients and no safety margin for block of the sodium currents. In a parallel-group study, 240 male and female subjects received treatment with either the clinical dose (200 mg intravenously) or a supratherapeutic dose (800 mg intravenously) of oritavancin, placebo, or a positive control (400 mg of oral moxifloxacin). Electrocardiograms were recorded in triplicate at several time points after dosing. The primary end point was the largest baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QTcI observed at any point after oritavancin dosing. The study's sensitivity to demonstrate a sufficiently small QTc change was confirmed by the moxifloxacin effect. The baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QTcI was between -3 milliseconds and 3 milliseconds after 800 mg of oritavancin, and an effect exceeding 6 milliseconds was confidently excluded. Other electrocardiographic parameters were unaffected by the treatment. It was concluded that oritavancin did not cause QTc prolongation in this thorough QT study.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of three moxifloxacin dosage forms: implications for blinding in active-controlled cardiac repolarization studies.

Moxifloxacin is used in thorough QT studies to assess sensitivity for detection of an increase in QTc. Moxifloxacin is usually over-encapsulated for blinding. However, there is concern that over-encapsulation alters its pharmacokinetics. In a 4-arm, randomized crossover study, 22 volunteers received over-encapsulated moxifloxacin, over-encapsulated placebo, bare moxifloxacin, and intravenous (IV) moxifloxacin. Placebo capsules and IV infusions were administered so that treatments in each arm, except for bare moxifloxacin, were indistinguishable. Pharmacokinetics of the oral treatments were found to be nearly identical and to meet Food and Drug Administration criteria for bioequivalency. Relative to the IV infusion administered over 1 hour, the tablet formulation was bioequivalent to total exposure but not peak exposure maximum plasma concentration, which was lower by 22%. Median time to maximum plasma concentration of the IV infusion was 1.00 hour. A 2-compartment model with oral absorption and linear elimination adequately described the observed moxifloxacin data. Changes in QTcF mirrored the pharmacokinetic changes, and there was a linear relationship between plasma concentration of moxifloxacin and change in QTcF. A 2-stage infusion scheme for IV moxifloxacin mimics the oral plasma concentration versus time curve. Over-encapsulation of moxifloxacin did not alter its peak or total systemic exposures or pharmacodynamics after oral administration.

Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 ambulatory subjects.

BACKGROUND: Reference ranges for electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals, heart rate, and QRS axis in general use by medical personnel and ECG readers are unrepresentative of true age- and sex-related values in large populations and are not based on modern electrocardiographic and ECG reading technology. METHODS AND RESULTS: The results of ECG interpretation by cardiologists using digital technology for viewing and interpreting ECGs were compiled from single, baseline ECGs of 79,743 individuals included in pharmaceutical company-sponsored clinical trials. Women comprised 48% of the total population. Ages ranged from 3 months to 99 years, and the bulk of the population (56%) was aged 40 to 70 years. Striking differences in numerical ECG values based on age and sex were observed. A subgroup of 46,129 individuals with a very low probability of cardiovascular disease was identified. The following were the reference ranges for this subgroup, determined using the 2nd and 98th percentiles: heart rate, 48 to 98 beats/min; PR interval, 113 to 212 milliseconds; QRS interval, 69 to 109 milliseconds; frontal plane QRS axis, -40 degrees to 91 degrees ; QT interval, 325 to 452 milliseconds; QTc-Bazett, 361 to 457 milliseconds; and QTc-Fridericia, 359 to 445 milliseconds. There were marked age- and sex-related variations in the reference ranges of this subgroup, and they differ substantially from previously reported norms. Small differences were observed in ECG values obtained using our digital methods as compared with readings done using paper tracings and values computed by 2 commercial computer algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: We observed large differences in electrocardiographic heart rate, interval, and axis reference ranges in this study compared with those reported previously and with reference ranges in general use. We also observed a large influence of age and sex upon normal values. Very large cohorts are required to fully assess age- and sex-related variation of reference ranges. Electrocardiographic reference ranges should be modernized.

Therapeutic angiogenesis with recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 for intermittent claudication (the TRAFFIC study): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 (rFGF-2) improves perfusion in models of myocardial and hindlimb ischaemia. We investigated whether one or two doses of intra-arterial rFGF-2 improves exercise capacity in patients with moderate-to-severe intermittent claudication. METHODS: 190 patients with intermittent claudication caused by infra-inguinal atherosclerosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1) bilateral intra-arterial infusions of placebo on days 1 and 30 (n=63); rFGF-2 (30 microg/kg) on day 1 and placebo on day 30 (single-dose, n=66); or rFGF-2 (30 microg/kg) on days 1 and 30 (double-dose, n=61). Primary outcome was 90-day change in peak walking time. Secondary outcomes included ankle-brachial pressure index and safety. The main analysis was per protocol. FINDINGS: Before 90 days, six patients had undergone peripheral revascularisation and were excluded, and ten withdrew or had missing data. 174 were therefore assessed for primary outcome. Peak walking time at 90 days was increased by 0.60 min with placebo, by 1.77 min with single-dose, and by 1.54 min with double-dose. By ANOVA, the difference between groups was p=0.075. In a secondary intention-to-treat analysis, in which all 190 patients were included, the difference was p=0.034. Pairwise comparison showed a significant difference between placebo and single-dose (p=0.026) but placebo and double-dose did not differ by much (p=0.45). Serious adverse events were similar in all groups. INTERPRETATION: Intra-arterial rFGF-2 resulted in a significant increase in peak walking time at 90 days; repeat infusion at 30 days was no better than one infusion. The findings of TRAFFIC provide evidence of clinical therapeutic angiogenesis by intra-arterial infusion of an angiogenic protein.