Barriers to frostbite treatment at an academic medical center.

The treatment of frostbite injuries has undergone a radical change over the past decade with a shift from supportive therapy and observation towards early and aggressive medical intervention with thrombolytics and vasodilators. Institutions that have implemented evidence-based protocols have significantly decreased their amputation rates (Bruen et al., 2007; Lindford et al., 2017a; Twomey et al., 2005). We present the case of a middle-aged male treated for frostbite of multiple fingers on both hands. Because there was no treatment protocol at our institution, there were multiple delays in the patient's care including imaging and initiation of intravenous (IV) prostanoids. This case illustrates the deleterious effects of delays in treatment and strongly suggests that all facilities located in areas of cold exposure should have protocols in place for such an occurrence.

Challenges and Opportunities for Emergency Department Sepsis Screening at Triage.

Feasibility of ED triage sepsis screening, before diagnostic testing has been performed, has not been established. In a retrospective, outcome-blinded chart review of a one-year cohort of ED adult septic shock patients ("derivation cohort") and three additional, non-consecutive months of all adult ED visits ("validation cohort"), we evaluated the qSOFA score, the Shock Precautions on Triage (SPoT) vital-signs criterion, and a triage concern-for-infection (tCFI) criterion based on risk factors and symptoms, to screen for sepsis. There were 19,670 ED patients in the validation cohort; 50 developed ED septic shock, of whom 60% presented without triage hypotension, and 56% presented with non-specific symptoms. The tCFI criterion improved specificity without substantial reduction of sensitivity. At triage, sepsis screens (positive qSOFA vital-signs and tCFI, or positive SPoT vital-signs and tCFI) were 28% (95% CI: 16-43%) and 56% (95% CI: 41-70%) sensitive, respectively, p < 0.01. By the conclusion of the ED stay, sensitivities were 80% (95% CI: 66-90%) and 90% (95% CI: 78-97%), p > 0.05, and specificities were 97% (95% CI: 96-97%) and 95% (95% CI: 95-96%), p < 0.001. ED patients who developed septic shock requiring vasopressors often presented normotensive with non-specific complaints, necessitating a low threshold for clinical concern-for-infection at triage.

Optimal approach to circumferential decompression and reconstruction for thoracic spine metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Circumferential decompression has been demonstrated to be the first-line therapy for patients with metastatic tumors in the thoracic spine requiring surgical intervention. However, there is significant debate regarding whether these tumors are best accessed anteriorly utilizing a thoracotomy or posteriorly. We used decision analysis to determine which approach yields greater health-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1990 and 2011 on anterior and posterior approaches to metastatic disease in the thoracic spine. QOL values for major treatment outcomes were determined using the existing literature. Separate models were created for ambulatory and nonambulatory patients. A Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analyses were used to determine which treatment strategy resulted in the highest QOL. RESULTS: For ambulatory patients, an anterior approach resulted in a slightly higher QOL, and for nonambulatory patients, a posterior approach was favored, but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Using a decision-analytic model, we found no significant difference in QOL resulting from anterior versus posterior approaches to metastatic lesions in the thoracic spine. Decisions should instead be based on surgeon comfort, tumor characteristics, anatomy of the lesion, patient-related factors, and goals of the operation.