The effect of anaesthetic agents on induction, recovery and patient preferences in adult day case surgery: a 7-day follow-up randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare induction, pre- and post-discharge recovery characteristics and patient preferences between four anaesthetic regimens in adult day-surgery. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial. In all, 1158 adults assigned to: propofol induction and maintenance, propofol induction with isoflurane/N2O, or sevoflurane/N2O maintenance, or sevoflurane/N2O alone. We prospectively recorded induction and pre-discharge recovery characteristics, collected 7-day post-discharge recovery characteristics using patient diaries and patient preferences by telephone follow-up. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 73%--of the 425 refusals, 226 were not willing to risk a volatile induction. During induction, excitatory movements and breath holding were more common with sevoflurane only (P < 0.01). Injection pain and hiccup were more common with propofol induction (P < 0.01). In the recovery room and the postoperative ward, both nausea and vomiting were more common with sevoflurane only (P < 0.01). This difference disappeared within 48 h. There was no difference between groups in the mental state on awakening, recovery time, time to discharge or overnight admissions; then was also no difference in pain between the four groups for each of the seven postoperative days (P < 0.01), nor any differences in concentration or forgetfulness. Patients took 6.5 days (95% CI: 6.0-7.0, n = 693) to resume normal activities. Patients who received sevoflurane only were more likely to recall an unpleasant induction and least likely to want the same induction method again (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Differences in outcome between the four regimens are transient; sevoflurane is not an ideal sole agent for adult day case anaesthesia and, in this setting, patients base their preferences for future anaesthetics on the method of induction.

Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

We compared the cost-effectiveness of general anaesthetic agents in adult and paediatric day surgery populations. We randomly assigned 1063 adult and 322 paediatric elective patients to one of four (adult) or two (paediatric) anaesthesia groups. Total costs were calculated from individual patient resource use to 7 days post discharge. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were expressed as cost per episode of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) avoided. In adults, variable secondary care costs were higher for propofol induction and propofol maintenance (propofol/propofol; p < 0.01) than other groups and lower in propofol induction and isoflurane maintenance (propofol/isoflurane; p < 0.01). In both studies, predischarge PONV was higher if sevoflurane/sevoflurane (p < 0.01) was used compared with use of propofol for induction. In both studies, there was no difference in postdischarge outcomes at Day 7. Sevoflurane/sevoflurane was more costly with higher PONV rates in both studies. In adults, the cost per extra episode of PONV avoided was pound 296 (propofol/propofol vs. propofol/ sevoflurane) and pound 333 (propofol/sevoflurane vs. propofol/isoflurane).

Anaesthesia for day case surgery: a survey of paediatric clinical practice in the UK.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In October 2000, we conducted a national postal survey of day case consultant anaesthetists in the UK to explore the range and variation in practice of anaesthetizing a patient for day case surgery (paediatrics, urology and orthopaedics). This paper reports the findings of this national survey of paediatric day case anaesthetic practice carried out as part of a major two-centre randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the costs and outcome of several anaesthetic techniques during day care surgery in paediatric and adult patients (cost-effectiveness study of anaesthesia in day case surgery). METHODS: The survey used a structured postal questionnaire and collected data on the duration of surgical procedure; the use of premedication; the anaesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance; the fresh gas flow rates used for general anaesthesia; the use of antiemetics; and the administration of local anaesthesia and analgesia. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the survey was 74 and 63% for the paediatric section of the survey. Respondents indicated that 19% used premedication, 63% used propofol for induction, 54% used isoflurane for maintenance, 24% used prophylactic antiemetics and 85%, used a laryngeal mask. The findings of this national survey are discussed and compared with published evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This survey identifies the variation in clinical practice in paediatric day surgery anaesthesia in the UK.

Anaesthesia for day case surgery: a survey of adult clinical practice in the UK.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In October 2000, we conducted a national postal survey of consultant day case anaesthetists in the UK to explore the range and variation in the practice of anaesthetizing a patient for day case surgery (paediatrics, urology and orthopaedics). The survey was carried out as part of a larger study that comprised a major two-centre randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the costs and outcome of several anaesthetic techniques during day care surgery in paediatric and adult patients (cost-effectiveness study of anaesthesia in day case surgery). We report the findings of this national survey of adult urology and orthopaedic day case anaesthetic practice in the UK. METHODS: The survey used a structured postal questionnaire and collected data on the duration of the surgical procedure; the use of premedication; the anaesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance; the fresh gas flows used for anaesthesia; the use of antiemetics; and the administration of local anaesthesia and analgesia. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the survey was 74% (63% for urology, 67% for orthopaedics). The survey indicated the following practice in adult urology and adult orthopaedic day case surgery: 6 and 12% used premedication; propofol was the preferred induction agent (96 and 97%) and isoflurane the preferred maintenance agent (56 and 58%); 32 and 41% used prophylactic antiemetics; 86 and 93% used a laryngeal mask. CONCLUSIONS: This survey identifies the variation in current clinical practice in adult day surgery anaesthesia in the UK and discusses this variation in the context of current published evidence.

Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the induction and recovery characteristics associated with propofol induction and halothane maintenance with sevoflurane anaesthesia in paediatric day surgery. METHODS: In total, 322 children were assigned randomly to i.v. propofol induction and halothane/nitrous oxide maintenance or sevoflurane/nitrous oxide alone. The patients' age, sex, and type of surgery were recorded, as were the times required for anaesthetic induction, maintenance, recovery and time to discharge home. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the incidence of adverse events during induction and recovery were also noted. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in age, sex, type of surgery performed or intraoperative opioid administration. Excitatory movement was more common during induction with sevoflurane. The mean time required for induction with propofol was 3.1 min compared with 5 min in the sevoflurane group (P<0.001). The recovery time was shorter in the sevoflurane group compared with propofol/halothane (23.2 vs 26.4 min, P<0.002). The incidence of delirium in recovery was greater in the sevoflurane group (P<0.001). There was no difference between groups in the time spent on the postoperative ward before discharge home. On the postoperative ward the incidence of both nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the sevoflurane group (P=0.034). Five children were admitted to hospital overnight, none for anaesthetic reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The increased incidence of adverse events during induction, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative delirium in the sevoflurane group suggests that sevoflurane is not ideal as a sole agent for paediatric day case anaesthesia.

Anaesthetic agents in adult day case surgery.

This study reports a review of all comparative published studies of adult day case anaesthesia in the English language up to December 2000. Ten databases were searched using appropriate keywords and data were extracted in a standardized fashion. One hundred-and-one published studies were examined. Recovery measurements were grouped as early, intermediate, late, psychomotor and adverse effects. With respect to induction of anaesthesia, propofol was superior to methohexital, etomidate and thiopental, but equal to sevoflurane and desflurane. Desflurane and sevoflurane were both superior to thiopental. There was no detectable difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane. With respect to the maintenance of anaesthesia, isoflurane and halothane were the worst. There were no significant differences between propofol, desflurane, sevoflurane and enflurane. Propofol is the induction agent of choice in day case patients. The use of a propofol infusion and avoidance of nitrous oxide may help to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Anaesthetic agents in paediatric day case surgery: do they affect outcome?

Both the numbers of children undergoing day case surgery and the type of procedures performed in this way are increasing. This expansion will only be beneficial if anaesthesia and surgery are provided with minimal post-operative morbidity e.g. postoperative delirium or nausea and vomiting. The choice of anaesthetic technique is considered critical to optimizing the service provided to patients and for this reason much research has addressed this question. This review considers the effect of anaesthetic technique on postoperative outcome in paediatric day case surgery. The outcome measures reviewed by this article are induction of anaesthesia, effects on the cardiovascular system, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In each section both quantitative and qualitative outcome measures are discussed. Comparisons are made between sevoflurane and halothane, sevoflurane and propofol, propofol and halothane, desflurane and halothane and the presence or absence of nitrous oxide.

The new neuromuscular blocking agents: do they offer any advantages?

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the two most recent aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking drugs to become available, rapacuronium bromide (Org 9487) and rocuronium bromide are reviewed. Two new classes of drug with neuromuscular blocking properties, the bis-tetrahydroisoquinolinium chlorofumarates and the tropinyl diester derivatives are introduced. Comparisons between these drugs and mivacurium and cisatracurium are made. Rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg(-1) (ED95 1 mg kg(-1)), produces maximal neuromuscular block in 54 s. Time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.7 is achieved within 20 min after neostigmiine 0.05 mg kg(-1) given at 2 min. The plasma clearance of rapacuronium is 7-8 ml kg(-1) min(-1). Rapacuronium undergoes hepatic metabolism: no prolongation of effect has been reported after a single bolus or a short infusion in patients with hepatic or renal failure. Org 9488 is the 3-desacetyl metabolite of rapacuronium, which has neuromuscular blocking properties. Its much lower clearance (1.28 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) and plasma equilibration constant (0.105 min(-1)) may limit the prolonged use of rapacuronium. Rocuronium given at 2xED95 produces maximal neuromuscular block in 1 min. Spontaneous recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.7 takes over 40 min. Rocuronium has a plasma clearance of 4 ml kg(-1) min(-1). Its pharmacodynamics are altered in hepatic and renal disease. A number of anaphylactoid reactions to rocuronium have been reported recently. The bis-tetrahydroisoquinolinium chlorofumarate GW280430A has an ED95 of 0.19 mg kg(-1). Given at three times this dose, onset of neuromuscular block occurs within 100 s; the duration of block is 8-9 min. Following a 2 h infusion, the recovery index does not seem to be increased. Early studies suggest that this drug has no adverse cardiovascular or respiratory side-effects. The tropinyl diester derivative G-1-64 will produce 80-90% neuromuscular block in less than 2 min using 3xED80. Ninety per cent recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four occurs after 5-7 min using one ED80. A recovery index of less than 2 min has been reported in rats. All the tropinyl diesters appear to produce vagal block.

A survey of epidural technique and accidental dural puncture rates among obstetric anaesthetists.

Five hundred UK obstetric anaesthetists were surveyed to investigate retrospectively the relationship between experience, rotation of the epidural needle within the epidural space, choice of loss-of-resistance agent and accidental dural puncture (ADP) rate. Responses were received from 390 (78%) of the members surveyed. Anaesthetists with more than 15 years' experience are more likely to perform an epidural with the patient in the lateral position (P < 0.001), use loss-of-resistance to air to detect the epidural space (P < 0.001) and rotate the epidural needle after identifying the epidural space (P = 0.001) when compared to those of less experience. A reduced inadvertent dural puncture rate was found to be associated with increased frequency of performing the procedure (P = 0.012), greater experience of the practitioner (P = 0.049) and non-rotation of the epidural needle (P = 0.023). There are three components that can alter from case to case; patient positioning, loss-of-resistance agent and needle rotation. Loss-of-resistance agent and patient positioning in isolation did not significantly influence ADP rate. This study suggests that the combination of practising lateral patient positioning, loss-of-resistance to saline and non-rotation of the epidural needle significantly reduces ADP rate (P = 0.035).

Inhalational versus intravenous induction. A survey of emergency anaesthetic practice in the United Kingdom.

A survey was constructed to ascertain the views of The Royal College of Anaesthetists tutors regarding the acceptability of inhalational induction with sevoflurane for emergency anaesthesia. A questionnaire was sent to all tutors asking them to indicate their preferred choice of anaesthetic technique, and whether they believed inhalation induction with sevoflurane to be acceptable, in each of four scenarios: acute epiglottis; bleeding after tonsillectomy; appendicitis; and laparotomy in the shocked patient. Two hundred and sixty-two (89%) completed questionnaires were received from 294 college tutors. We have shown that the majority of The Royal College of Anaesthetists tutors would use sevoflurane for patients with an acutely compromised airway. One in four college tutors would accept the use of sevoflurane for a shocked patient for laparotomy. Anaesthetists who manage critically ill patients with an inhalational induction should be reassured by the fact, that a significant proportion of their colleagues would find this technique acceptable.

Apolipoprotein A-I in bile inhibits cholesterol crystallization and modifies transcellular lipid transfer through cultured human gall-bladder epithelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I), conventionally purified by several steps including organic solvent-delipidation from plasma, inhibits cholesterol crystallization in bile. To observe a significant effect in vitro, however, supraphysiological concentrations above 100 microg/mL are required. For this reason, this protein has not been considered to play a physiological role in vivo. In the present study, we examined the cholesterol crystal growth-inhibiting effect of biliary Apo A-I at its physiological concentration, the modification of transcellular transfer of biliary lipids through cultured human gall-bladder epithelial cells (GBEC) by Apo A-I at its physiological concentration and the binding and secretion of Apo A-I by GBEC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We purified biliary Apo A-I to near homogeneity using immobilized artificial membrane chromatography. At 5 microg/mL, biliary Apo A-I reduced cholesterol crystal mass by 50%, whereas plasma-derived, solvent-delipidated Apo A-I had no effect. Using an antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we found reduced Apo A-I concentrations in bile samples from gallstone patients when compared with bile samples from gallstone-free controls (medians, 2.35 and 9.4 microg/mL, respectively). In a GBEC line, Apo A-I (5 microg/mL) enhanced transfer of phospholipid and cholesterol from the mucosal to the serosal side of cell monolayers by approximately 50%. These cells appear to bind Apo A-I reversibly in a dose- and time-dependent manner, compatible with receptor-type binding. Cultured human gall-bladder epithelial cells also showed basal secretion of Apo A-I, which was greatly increased by exposure to model bile solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Apolipoprotein A-I in bile, thus, has both a direct effect on cholesterol crystal formation and enhances lipid removal from gall-bladder bile by GBEC. This effect may be specific and receptor mediated. These observations support two separate roles for human biliary Apo A-I and suggest that this protein may be important in preventing the formation of cholesterol crystals (the initial step in gallstone formation) in supersaturated bile.

Diffusion behavior of lipid vesicles in entangled polymer solutions.

Dynamic light scattering was used to follow the tracer diffusion of phospholipid/cholesterol vesicles in aqueous polyacrylamide solutions and compared with the diffusive behavior of polystyrene (PS) latex spheres of comparable diameters. Over the range of the matrix concentration examined (Cp = 0.1-10 mg/ml), the diffusivities of the PS spheres and the large multilamellar vesicles exhibited the Stokes-Einstein (SE) relation, while the diffusivity of the unilamellar vesicles did not follow the increase of the solution's viscosity caused by the presence of the matrix molecules. The difference between the diffusion behaviors of unilamellar vesicles and hard PS spheres of similar size is possibly due to the flexibility of the lipid bilayer of the vesicles. The unilamellar vesicles are capable of changing their shape to move through the entangled polymer solution so that the hindrance to their diffusion due to the presence of the polymer chains is reduced, while the rigid PS spheres have little flexibility and they encounter greater resistance. The multilamellar vesicles are less flexible, thus their diffusion is similar to the hard PS spheres of similar diameter.

Effect of NSAIDs on gallbladder bile composition.

Secretion of gallbladder mucin is an important step in gallstone pathogenesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can both inhibit gallbladder mucin secretion and prevent gallstone formation in animal models of cholesterol gallstone disease. The present study was performed to determine if chronic NSAID use was associated with a reduction in the mucin content or affected the lipid components of human gallbladder bile. Four groups of patients were identified retrospectively from a cohort of 230 morbidly obese patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery. The index group consisted of 18 patients who were found to have gallstones at gastric bypass surgery and had a history of chronic NSAID use. Three other patient groups were identified from the cohort by matching this index population for sex, race, and age according to the following criteria: (1) patients with gallstones who had not utilized NSAIDs, (2) patients without gallstones but with chronic NSAID use, and (3) patients without gallstones and without a history of NSAID use. Gallbladder bile was obtained from all patients by direct aspiration from the gallbladder at the time of surgery. Patients with gallstones had a significantly (P < 0.02) greater concentration of gallbladder mucin in their gallbladder bile compared to patients without gallstones (0.897 +/- 0.226 vs 0.173 +/- 0.039 mg/ml). Among gallstone patients, gallbladder mucin was reduced in those patients with a history of chronic NSAID use (1.18 +/- 0.43 vs 0.74 +/- 0.19 mg/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)