Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioorg Med Chem ; 33: 116035, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550084

ABSTRACT

Microglia are the principle cell type driving sustained neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Multiple Sclerosis. Interestingly, microglia locked into a chronic M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype significantly up-regulate the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) expression. Our approach to exploiting CB2 as a therapeutic target in neuroinflammatory diseases focuses on the development of selective CB2 inverse agonists to shift microglia bias to a M2 pro-wound healing phenotype. Herein we report work designed to refine the structure activity relationship of the 2,6-dihydroxy-biphenyl-aryl-methanone CB2 inverse agonist scaffold. A series of analogs of our lead compound SMM-189 were synthesized and measured for affinity/selectivity, potency, and efficacy in regulating cAMP production and ß-arrestin recruitment. In this series compound 40 demonstrated a significant increase in potency and efficacy for cAMP stimulation compared to SMM-189. Akin to our lead SMM-189, this compound was highly efficacious in biasing microglia to an M2 pro-wound healing phenotype in LPS stimulated cell lines. These results advance our understanding of the structure-activity relationship of the 2,6-dihydroxy-biphenyl-aryl-methanone scaffold and provide further support for regulating microglia activation using CB2 inverse agonists.


Subject(s)
Benzophenones/pharmacology , Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2/agonists , Animals , Benzophenones/chemical synthesis , Benzophenones/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Mice , Molecular Structure , Structure-Activity Relationship , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
Front Mol Neurosci ; 12: 128, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31178692

ABSTRACT

C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) inbred mouse strains are highly variable genetically and differ in a large number of behavioral traits related to striatal function, including depression, anxiety, stress response, and response to drugs of abuse. The genetic basis of these phenotypic differences are, however, unknown. Here, we present a comparison of the striatal proteome between B6 and D2 and relate differences at the protein level to strain differences at the mRNA level. We also leverage a recombinant inbred BXD population derived from B6 and D2 strains to investigate the role of genetic variation on the regulation of mRNA and protein levels. Finally, we test the hypothesis that differential protein expression contributes to differential behavioral responses between the B6 and D2 strain. We detected the expression of over 2,500 proteins in membrane-enriched protein fractions from B6 and D2 striatum. Of these, 160 proteins demonstrated significant differential expression between B6 and D2 strains at a 10% false discovery level, including COMT, GABRA2, and cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1)-key proteins involved in synaptic transmission and behavioral response. Similar to previous reports, there was little overlap between protein and transcript levels (25%). However, the overlap was greater (51%) for proteins demonstrating genetic regulation of cognate gene expression. We also found that striatal proteins with significantly higher or lower relative expression in B6 and D2 were enriched for dopaminergic and glutamatergic synapses and processes involved in synaptic plasticity [e.g., long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD)]. Finally, we validated higher expression of CNR1 in B6 striatum and demonstrated greater sensitivity of this strain to the locomotor inhibiting effects of the CNR1 agonist, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Our study is the first comparison of differences in striatal proteins between the B6 and D2 strains and suggests that alterations in the striatal proteome may underlie strain differences in related behaviors, such as drug response. Furthermore, we propose that genetic variants that impact transcript levels are more likely to also exhibit differential expression at the protein level.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...