A Comparison of Variable Versus Fixed Insulin Infusion Rate on Resolution of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a well-known, potentially fatal complication of diabetes. The American Diabetes Association hyperglycemic crises guidelines suggest the use of intravenous insulin in patients presenting with DKA, along with a recommended rate of glucose reduction of 50-75 mg/dL/h. However, no specific guidance is provided regarding how to best achieve this rate of glucose decline. STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in time to DKA resolution between a variable intravenous insulin infusion strategy and a fixed infusion strategy in the absence of an institutional protocol? STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of DKA patient encounters in 2018. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Insulin infusion strategy was considered to be variable if the infusion rate changed within the first 8 hours of therapy or was considered fixed if the rate remained unchanged for the same period. The primary outcome was time to resolution of DKA. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, hypoglycemia, mortality, and DKA recurrence. RESULTS: The median time to resolution of DKA was 9.3 hours in the variable infusion group compared with 7.8 hours in the fixed infusion group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.5, P = 0.5360). Severe hypoglycemia was observed in 13% of patients in the variable infusion group and in 50% of patients in the fixed infusion group ( P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, insulin infusion strategy (variable vs. fixed) was not associated with a significant difference in the time to resolution of DKA in the absence of an institutional protocol. The fixed infusion strategy was associated with a higher incidence of severe hypoglycemia.

Evaluating the Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Metabolic Changes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on High-Dose Insulin.

BACKGROUND: Studies involving the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) liraglutide have shown reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and insulin requirements in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) requiring high-dose insulin therapy. The effect of the class of GLP-1 RAs on these parameters is unknown. DATA SOURCES: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in patients with DM2 where a GLP-1 RA was added to high-dose insulin therapy. The primary composite outcome was the change from baseline to 9 months in HbA1c, weight, and insulin dose. RESULTS: GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (-0.9%; P = 0.022). Weight and insulin dose were not significantly reduced from baseline. There was a moderate effect of individual agents on these outcomes, but no significant reductions were seen due to the small sample size. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability of these findings may be limited by the characteristics and size of the study population. THERAPEUTIC OPINION: The effect of GLP-1 RA therapy on HbA1c may be attributed to the medication class. The effect of individual agents on weight and insulin requirements needs further investigation.

Critical Low Catastrophe: A Case Report of Treatment-Refractory Hypoglycemia following Overdose of Long-Acting Insulin.

Overdose of long-acting insulin can cause unpredictable hypoglycemia for prolonged periods of time. The initial treatment of hypoglycemia includes oral carbohydrate intake as able and/or parenteral dextrose infusion. Refractory hypoglycemia following these interventions presents a clinical challenge in the absence of clear guidelines for management. Octreotide has sometimes been used, but its use is generally limited to sulfonylurea overdose. In this case report, we present a case of refractory hypoglycemia following an overdose of 900 units of long-acting insulin glargine that failed to respond to usual modes of therapy mentioned above. Stress-dose corticosteroids were then initiated, followed by subsequent improvement in IV dextrose and glucagon requirements and blood glucose levels. Hence, corticosteroids may serve as an adjunctive therapy in managing hypoglycemia and can be considered earlier in the course of treatment in patients with refractory hypoglycemia to prevent volume overload, especially when large volumes of dextrose infusions are required.

Utilization of High-Intensity Statins in Patients at Risk for Cardiovascular Events: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines, which identified four groups of patients at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, departed from the target-based approach to managing cholesterol. The impact of these guidelines on high-intensity statin use across the United States is unclear. STUDY QUESTION: The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of high-intensity potential (HIP) statin use before and after the 2013 guidelines. The secondary objective was to identify predictors of HIP statin use within the study population. STUDY DESIGN: A national cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Office visits involving patients aged 21-75 years where criteria for HIP statin therapy were met were included. Visits involving pregnant patients were excluded. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Prescribing trends of HIP statins were measured from National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data before and after the 2013 guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression identified variables associated with prescribing HIP statins. RESULTS: A total of 48,884 visits were included, representing more than 940 million office visits nationally. HIP statins were listed in 9.5% and 16.5% of visits before and after 2013, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-2.20). The strongest predictors of HIP statin use were antihypertensive use (OR 5.38, 95% CI 4.67-6.20), comorbid hyperlipidemia (OR 2.93, 95% CI 2.62-3.29), Black race (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.81), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing rates for HIP statins increased after the release of the 2013 guidelines. The prescribing rates were lower than expected, especially in Black and Hispanic patients. These observations signify opportunities to improve the quality of care for patients who are at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in the United States.

Prevalence and Predictors of Metformin Prescribing in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Metformin is the first-line oral type 2 diabetes treatment. Despite an abundance of evidence, metformin is routinely underused. This study evaluated the rates of metformin use in an appropriate outpatient type 2 diabetes population and identified predictors of metformin use. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Office visits involving patients aged 18-79 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were included, and visits involving patients with a diagnosis of chronic renal failure or heart failure were excluded. The primary outcome was metformin-prescribing rate. Multivariate logistic regression identified variables associated with metformin prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 2348 patient visits were eligible for inclusion, representing 88,671,714 office visits nationally. Metformin was continued or initiated in 40.6% of these visits. The strongest independent predictors of metformin prescribing were insulin use (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.47), presence of four or more chronic conditions (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34-0.98), patients with Medicare insurance (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.83), visit with a surgical specialist (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.61) or a medical specialist (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38-0.92), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.28-3.22). CONCLUSION: Metformin-prescribing rates are low, particularly in patients receiving insulin, with Medicare insurance, seen by medical or surgical specialists, or with four or more chronic conditions. The observed low rates of metformin use represent an important opportunity to improve the quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Evaluation of factors associated with achieving glycemic control in a pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic.

The aim of this study was to identify factors that are associated with patients achieving goal A1c after 6 months in a pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic. This study is a descriptive, retrospective chart review of patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic. The primary endpoint was the odds of each identified factor being associated with achievement of goal A1c after 6 months of enrollment. The factors were also evaluated within 2 subgroups: those with a baseline A1c >7% and those with a baseline A1c >9%. Of 112 patients enrolled, 58 were included in the analysis. There was a positive association with reaching goal for patients who had <1 failure to show (FTS) to office visits in 6 months [odds ratio (OR) 8.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-58.65], had canceled or FTS to <50% of office visits (OR 10.0, 95% CI 1.8-72.79), and brought >75% of blood glucose logs to their office visits (OR 7.36, 95% CI 1.87-30.88). There was a negative association with reaching the goal for patients with documented social worker involvement (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04-0.99) and noninsulin or insulin dose increases at >50% of office visits (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.55). Overall, this analysis found that patients who had <1 FTS, had canceled or FTS to <50% of office visits, or who brought >75% logs to office visits were more likely to achieve goal A1c, whereas patients with social work assistance or dose increases at >50% of office visits were less likely to reach goal A1c.

Utilization of a reminder mailing to improve blood glucose log reporting in an outpatient diabetes clinic.

Self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) offers a strategy used to achieve glycemic control in diabetic patients. However, if SMBG readings are unavailable to clinicians, this strategy will have a limited effect. This study assessed the impact of a reminder mailing on response rates to requests for SMBG logs. Patients were asked to mail completed SMBG logs to the clinic in 2 weeks. For the intervention, a reminder mailing was sent to each patient 1 week before SMBG logs were to be returned. Compliance rates pre and postinterventions were compared. The primary outcome was the percentage of all SMBG logs returned on time. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of SMBG logs returned, percentage fulfilled, percentage of clinic appointments kept, percentage of SMBG logs brought to follow-up appointments, and number of interventions made to antidiabetic therapy. Twenty SMBG requests were made in the preintervention cohort versus 19 in postintervention cohort. A trend toward more on time and fulfilled SMBG requests was observed post vs. preintervention. Overall return rates were similar between groups. A nonsignificant increase in clinic appointments kept and a nonsignificant decrease in interventions made were observed postintervention. Receipt of a reminder mail was not a significant predictor of patients bringing an SMBG log to follow-up appointments. In conclusion, the use of a reminder mail was not associated with an increase in the return rate of SMBG logs, although there were nonsignificant trends toward more on time and fulfilled SMBG logs received during the postintervention period.