ABSTRACT
Many challenges have emerged due to the intense integration of renewables in the distribution system and the associated uncertainties in power generation. Consequently, local management strategies are developed at the distribution level, leading to the emergence of concepts such as microgrids. Microgrids include a variety of heating, cooling, and electrical resources and loads, and the operators' aim is to minimize operation and outage costs. Since significant distribution system outages are typically caused by events such as earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes, microgrid operators are compelled to improve resilience to ensure uninterrupted service during such conditions. A mixed-integer linear programming model is designed in this paper to optimize the energy management and structural configuration of microgrids. This optimization aims to enhance resilience cost, minimizing operation and capital costs as well as power loss and pollution. To achieve these goals, several tools are implemented including reconfiguration, storages, combined cooling, heat and power units, wind turbines, photovoltaic panels, as well as capacitors. Four case studies are defined to prove the developed model efficiency. The first case study focuses on energy management in the microgrid for operation cost minimization. The second case study emphasizes the improvement of resilience alongside energy management, aiming at minimizing costs and enhance resilience. In the third case, the microgrid's reconfiguration capability is also added to the second case. Therefore, this case aims to optimize both energy and structural management within the microgrid to simultaneously enhance resilience and minimize operational costs. Finally, in the fourth case, the problem is studied in a multi-objective approach. By comparing the results, the resilience impact on the operation of microgrids is elucidated. By considering the resilience concept in microgrid operation and based on the results of case 2, it is found that the operating costs are increased by an average of 10.38 %. However, because of reducing resilience costs by an average of 13.91 %, the total cost is reduced by an average of 5.93 % in case 2 compared to case 1. Furthermore, when comparing cases 2 and 3, the reconfiguration effect can be determined. It can be observed that the operating costs are decreased by an average of 4.5 %. Moreover, the resilience cost is decreased by an average of 1.61 %, resulting in an overall reduction of the total objective function by an average of 2.43 % in case 3 compared to case 2.
