The effect of age on emotion processing in individuals with mood disorders and in healthy individuals.

Introduction: Emotion processing is an essential part of interpersonal relationships and social interactions. Changes in emotion processing have been found in both mood disorders and in aging, however, the interaction between such factors has yet to be examined in detail. This is of interest due to the contrary nature of the changes observed in existing research - a negativity bias in mood disorders versus a positivity effect with aging. It is also unclear how changes in non-emotional cognitive function with aging and in mood disorders, interact with these biases. Methods and results: In individuals with mood disorders and in healthy control participants, we examined emotional processing and its relationship to age in detail. Data sets from two studies examining facial expression recognition were pooled. In one study, 98 currently depressed individuals (either unipolar or bipolar) were compared with 61 healthy control participants, and in the other, 100 people with bipolar disorder (in various mood states) were tested on the same facial expression recognition task. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of age and mood disorder diagnosis alongside interactions between individual emotion, age, and mood disorder diagnosis. A positivity effect was associated with increasing age which was evident irrespective of the presence of mood disorder or current mood episode. Discussion: Results suggest a positivity effect occurring at a relatively early age but with no evidence of a bias toward negative emotions in mood disorder or specifically, in depressed episodes. The positivity effect in emotional processing in aging appears to occur even within people with mood disorders. Further research is needed to understand how this fits with negative biases seen in previous studies in mood disorders.

Relationship between baseline cognition and 18-month treatment response in bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have examined baseline cognitive function as a predictor of clinical outcome following treatment in bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this analysis was therefore to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function and treatment outcome in a sample of young adults with BD receiving Interpersonal Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) or Specialist Supportive Care (SSC) with adjunctive pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-six BD patients underwent baseline cognitive testing and completed 18 months of IPSRT or SCC. Univariate analyses examined the relationship between baseline cognitive function (global and individual cognitive domains) and change in mood symptom burden, and psychosocial functioning, from baseline to treatment-end. RESULTS: Baseline global cognition was not predictive of change in mood symptom burden over 18 months of treatment. However, poorer baseline psychomotor speed performance was associated with less improvement in mood symptom burden at treatment-end. Neither baseline global cognition nor individual cognitive domain scores were associated with change in psychosocial functioning. LIMITATIONS: Due to the exploratory nature of the study, correction was not made for multiple comparisons. Data was obtained from a relatively small sample and has been the subject of prior analysis, thereby increasing the likelihood of chance findings. CONCLUSION: Although global cognition was not associated with outcome, when examining individual domains, poorer baseline psychomotor speed predicted less change in mood symptom burden following 18-months of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. This suggests that pre-treatment measures of psychomotor speed may help to identify those who require additional, and more targeted, intervention. Further large-scale research is required.

Domain-Based Functional Improvements in Bipolar Disorder After Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Studies typically report overall change in function when assessing bipolar disorder (BD) interventions, but individual domains are not analyzed. Which aspects of functioning are impacted is clearly important and may differ between treatments. METHODS: Data were analyzed from two previous clinical trials of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) for BD patients. Change in total and subscale scores on the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report (SAS-SR) from 0 to 78 weeks, were analyzed. RESULTS: 152 BD patients took part in randomized controlled trials of IPSRT (n = 38) vs. Specialist Supportive Care (SSC) (n = 43), and of IPSRT (n = 41) vs. treatment as usual (TAU) which was discharge to primary care (n = 30). IPSRT was superior to TAU on change in the social and leisure activities and extended family subscales, and SAS-SR total score over 18 months. LIMITATIONS: Studies were not designed to be pooled. Patients in study 1 were younger and symptomatic at baseline. Patients assigned to TAU were more likely to drop-out. Patients did not respond to subscales that were not personally applicable (work, marital, children). CONCLUSION: IPSRT had a positive impact on two SAS-SR subscales compared to TAU over 18 months. Other subscales were limited by the lack of respondents due to individual applicability. Different psychotherapy may have differential effects on different domains of function. Measures of function and research into functioning in BD should include domain-based measures, and report the numbers of participants who respond to questions in each domain.

Functional and Mood Outcomes in Bipolar Disorder Patients With and Without Substance Use Disorders Undergoing Psychotherapy.

Objectives: Research suggests that patients with co-morbid bipolar disorder (BD) and substance use disorder (SUD) have a poorer illness course and clinical outcome. The evidence is limited as SUD patients are often excluded from BD studies. In particular, evidence regarding long term outcomes from studies using psychotherapies as an adjunctive treatment is limited. We therefore examined data from two studies of Interpersonal Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) for BD to determine whether lifetime or current SUD affected outcomes. Methods: Data were analyzed from two previous clinical trials of IPSRT for BD patients. Change in scores on the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) from 0 to 78 weeks and cumulative mood scores from 0 to 78 weeks, measured using the Life Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE), were analyzed. Results: Of 122 patients (non-SUD n = 67, lifetime SUD but no current n = 43, current SUD n = 12), 79 received IPSRT and 43 received a comparison therapy-specialist supportive care-over 18 months. Lifetime SUD had a significant negative effect on change in SAS score but not LIFE score. There was no effect of current SUD on either change in score. Secondary analysis showed no correlation between symptom count and change in SAS total score or LIFE score. Conclusion: Current SUD has no impact on mood or functional outcomes, however, current SUD numbers were small, limiting conclusions. Lifetime SUD appears to be associated with impaired functional outcomes from psychotherapy. There is limited research on co-morbid BD and SUD patients undergoing psychotherapy.