Use of psychological interventions among healthcare workers over the 2-year period following the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study.

INTRODUCTION: Although healthcare workers (HCWs) have reported mental health problems since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, they rarely use psychological support. Here, we described the use of psychological support among HCWs in Spain over the 2-year period following the initial pandemic outbreak and explore its association with workplace- and COVID-19-related factors measured at baseline, in 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study on HCWs working in Spain. We used an online survey to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, depressive symptoms, workplace- and COVID-19-related variables, and the use of psychological support at three time points (2020, 2021, and 2022). Data was available for 296, 294, and 251 respondents, respectively at time points 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 43 years and were mostly females (n = 242, 82%). The percentage of HCWs using psychological support increased from 15% in 2020 to 23% in 2022. Roughly one in four HCWs who did not use psychological support reported symptoms compatible with major depressive disorder at follow up. Baseline predictors of psychological support were having to make decisions about patients' prioritisation (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.47, 12.63) and probable depression (wave 2: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; wave 3: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is call for implementing mental health promotion and prevention strategies at the workplace, along with actions to reduce barriers for accessing psychological support.

Association between perceived discrimination and mental health outcomes among health workers during the initial COVID-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: During the initial COVID-19 outbreak, health systems faced unprecedented organizational stress. Meanwhile, reports of episodes of discrimination and violence towards healthcare workers increased globally. This study explores the association between perceived discrimination and mental health outcomes in a large sample of healthcare workers in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthcare workers from inpatient and outpatient facilities (N=2,053) filled an on-line questionnaire in May or June 2020. Mental health outcomes included depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire [GHQ-12]) and death thoughts (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS]). We also measured perceived discrimination and/or stigmatization due to being a healthcare worker since pandemic onset. Regression models adjusted for potential confounding sources (age, sex, history of a mental health diagnosis and type of job) were fitted. RESULTS: Thirty percent of the respondents reported discrimination and/or stigmatization. Perceived discrimination was associated with higher depression (B=2.4, 95 percent CI: 1.8, 2.9) and psychological distress (B=1.1, 95 percent CI: 0.7, 1.4) scores, and with a 2-fold increase in risk of reporting death thoughts (OR=2.0, 95 percent CI: 1.4, 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived discrimination is a modifiable driver of mental health problems among healthcare workers. Mass media, legislators, and healthcare institutions must put in place prevention and restoration strategies to limit discrimination towards healthcare workers and reduce its mental health impact.

The impact of resilience as a protective factor on Health-Related Quality of Life's psychological dimensions among adolescents who experience peer victimization.

Peer victimization have a negative impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) during adolescence, however some personal skills such a person's resilience could play a significant role in this relationship. In this context, this study aims to analyse if resilience is a moderator of the relation between peer victimization and HRQoL's psychological dimensions. Sociodemographic data, peer victimization, psychological domains of HRQoL and resilience were measures in a sample of 1428 secondary school students using the following scales: "Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument-Bullying", "KIDSCREEN-52" and "Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Different multivariate analyses were carried out using linear regression. PROCESS tool was used to examine the moderating role of resilience, with John-Neyman post-hoc approach to quantify moderation. Results suggest that resilience could moderate the association between physical (ß = - 0.0021; p = 0.025) and verbal victimization (ß = - 0.0018; p = 0.024) and the "Mood and Emotions" dimension of adolescents' HRQoL. Nevertheless, this regulating influence appears to be faint (∆R2 0.004). Resilience showed no moderating effect between social victimization and psychological dimensions of HRQoL. We concluded that resilience could function as a protective factor that weakly regulates the negative association between physical and verbal victimization and the psychological sphere of adolescents' HRQoL.

[Health impact of COVID pandemic. SESPAS Report 2022]. / El impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la salud. Informe SESPAS 2022.

OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization declared the global SARS-CoV-2 infection a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The objective of this paper is to present its impact in terms of physical and mental health 22 months later. METHOD: We have reviewed results from published meta-analysis and systematic reviews, and some individual articles on specific aspects of special interest. National information on infection comes for the Red Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (RENAVE). RESULTS: Up to the end of October, more than 250 million infections and 5 million deaths had been reported globally. In Spain, 4.7 million infections have been documented although the real figure might be above 7 million. The pandemic has reduced life expectancy, and its effects have been especially dramatic in people with comorbidities and the elderly. There is a worsening of mental health in the general population. It is foreseeable that some groups, such as health professionals, mostly women, and front-line workers, may have a greater risk of developing mental health pathologies. The pandemic and the control measures have had other undesirable consequences such as a decrease in healthcare utilization, an increase in sedentary lifestyle or an increase in gender violence. In addition to its immediate effect on morbidity and mortality, the control measures have damaged the overall health status of the global population. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal studies are necessary to determine the mid and long consequences of the pandemic and the control measures, and to identify and evaluate effective health interventions.

Sustained Negative Mental Health Outcomes Among Healthcare Workers Over the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Objective: To characterize the evolution of healthcare workers' mental health status over the 1-year period following the initial COVID-19 pandemic outbreak and to examine baseline characteristics associated with resolution or persistence of mental health problems over time. Methods: We conducted an 8-month follow-up cohort study. Eligible participants were healthcare workers working in Spain. Baseline data were collected during the initial pandemic outbreak. Survey-based self-reported measures included COVID-19-related exposures, sociodemographic characteristics, and three mental health outcomes (psychological distress, depression symptoms, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms). We examined three longitudinal trajectories in mental health outcomes between baseline and follow-up assessments (namely asymptomatic/stable, recovering, and persistently symptomatic/worsening). Results: We recruited 1,807 participants. Between baseline and follow-up assessments, the proportion of respondents screening positive for psychological distress and probable depression decreased, respectively, from 74% to 56% and from 28% to 21%. Two-thirds remained asymptomatic/stable in terms of depression symptoms and 56% remained symptomatic or worsened over time in terms of psychological distress. Conclusion: Poor mental health outcomes among healthcare workers persisted over time. Occupational programs and mental health strategies should be put in place.

Medidas de seguridad, una reflexión desde la práctica clínica / Compulsory treatment orders, a reflection from a clinical perspective

Las medidas de seguridad son medidas de tratamiento obligatorio en régimen ambulatorio o de internamiento que se imponen vía judicial a personas diagnosticadas de alguna patología mental que cometen un delito sin ser plenamente libres y responsables en el momento de la acción delictiva. Exponemos la experiencia práctica de profesionales de distintos dispositivos sanitarios a donde remiten a los pacientes que son penados y tienen que cumplir una medida de seguridad. Reflexionaremos sobre sus posibles efectos en la evolución clínica, las posibles estrategias que se podrían utilizar para que no se tuvieran que llegar a emplear y la necesidad de coordinación con el sistema judicial. (AU)

Compulsory treatment orders are compulsory outpatient or inpatient treatment orders that are judicially imposed on persons diagnosed with a mental disorder who commit a crime without being fully free and responsible at the time of the criminal action. We present the practical experience of professionals from different health facilities that work with patients who are convicted and must follow a compulsory treatment order. We argue their possible effects on their clinical evolution, the possible strategies that could be used to reduce them and the need for coordination with the judicial system. (AU)

Role of access to personal protective equipment, treatment prioritization decisions, and changes in job functions on health workers' mental health outcomes during the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the initial COVID-19 outbreak, organizational changes were required to ensure adequate staffing in healthcare facilities. The extent to which organizational changes impacted the mental wellbeing of healthcare workers (HCWs) remains unexplored. Here we analyzed the association between three work-related stressors (reported access to protective equipment, change in job functions, and patient prioritization decision-making) and mental health outcomes (depression symptoms, psychological distress, suicidal thoughts, and fear of infection) in a large sample of Spanish HCWs during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study including HCWs from three regions of Spain between April 24th and June 22nd, 2020. An online survey measured sociodemographic characteristics, work-related stressors, fear of infection, and mental health outcomes (depression [PHQ-9], psychological distress [GHQ-12], death wishes [C-SSRS]). We conducted mixed-effects regression models to adjust all associations for relevant individual- and region-level sources of confounding. RESULTS: We recruited 2,370 HCWs. Twenty-seven percent screened positive for depression and 74% for psychological distress. Seven percent reported death wishes. Respondents were more afraid of infecting their loved ones than of getting infected themselves. All work-related stressors were associated with depression symptoms and psychological distress in adjusted models. LIMITATIONS: Non-probabilistic sampling, potential reverse causation. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable work-related stressors are associated with worse mental health among HCWs. Our results suggest that workplace prevention strategies for HCWs should provide sufficient protective equipment, minimize changes in job functions, favor the implementation of criteria for patient triage and on-call bioethics committees, and facilitate access to stepped-care, evidence-based mental health treatment.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Spanish Women with Endometriomas or Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Case-Control Study.

Endometriosis is a disabling disease that may significantly compromise a woman's social relationships, sexuality, and mental health. Considering the impact of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) on quality of life and the limited number of papers on this topic, the objective of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult Spanish women with the condition. A case-control study was conducted on a group of 99 patients with ovarian endometriomas or DIE and 157 controls. Women underwent physical and gynecological examinations, and they completed health questionnaires including the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12v2), a survey for HRQoL. Eight scales and two component summary scores (Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS), respectively) were calculated. Women with endometriomas or DIE had significantly worse PCS: 47.7 ± 9.7 vs. 56.1 ± 5.9, respectively (p < 0.001) compared to controls, as well as lower scores on seven out of the eight scales (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found for the MCS. Conclusions: HRQoL was significantly lower in patients with endometriomas or DIE compared to controls. If confirmed, these results may have important implications for prevention, clinical practice, and intervention.

Assessment of Optimism in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Case Control-Study.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a chronic endocrinopathy characterized by hyperandrogenism and anovulation that may pervade psychological dimensions such as dispositional optimism. Considering how PCOS influences mental health and the lack of studies on this matter, this research was aimed at assessing optimism and associated factors in PCOS. A case-control study of 156 patients with PCOS and 117 controls was conducted. All woman filled out the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), a self-report questionnaire for measuring dispositional optimism. Medication, pain severity, gynecological, and sociodemographic information was also collected. Lower optimism was found in patients with PCOS compared to controls, even after covariate adjustment (LOT-R global scores: 14.1 vs. 15.9, p = 0.020). Our study provides evidence that a personality characteristic with important implications in illness prognosis may be affected in PCOS. We propose to assess dispositional optimism with the LOT-R scale in the gynecological appointment and tailor medical attention accordingly as a way to improve the comprehensive care of these patients within a multidisciplinary team.

Is dispositional optimism associated with endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis?

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a chronic painful condition characterized by high prognostic uncertainty, as well as the threat of infertility and emotional symptoms that may affect many aspects of women, including psychological characteristics like dispositional optimism. Considering the impact of endometriosis on psychological health and the paucity of papers on this topic, the aim of this study is to explore optimism and associated factors in endometriosis. METHODS: A case-control study was performed on a group of 95 women with endometriosis and 156 controls. All participants completed the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), a self-administered tool for assessing dispositional optimism. Pain severity, medication, gynecological and socio-demographic information was also collected. RESULTS: Low optimism was observed for women with endometriosis compared to controls even after covariate adjustment (LOT-R global scores: 14.5 vs. 15.9 points, p = .045). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that a personality dimension with many prognostic implications may be altered in women with endometriosis. Our findings highlight the importance of a broader understanding of this condition, treating this disorder from a biopsychosocial perspective and suggests the need for non-medical attention within a multidisciplinary team.

Correlates of preferring a passive role in decision-making among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors associated with the persistence of clinician-led style in the therapeutic relationship in cases of serious mental illness, and the conditioning factors that the patients identify as determinants of their health. METHOD: Assessment of preferences in the decision-making process and health-related control locus of 107 outpatients with DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Demographic and clinical information was also obtained through review of available records and using several scales. RESULTS: 64.4 % patients preferred to adopt a passive role in the therapeutic relationship. In the multivariate analysis, the preference of playing a passive role in the decision-making process was significantly associated with the elderly, being disabled, or the view that one's health depends on doctors (AUC ROC value: 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe mental illness more frequently preferred a passive role in the decision-making process. We found several factors associated with a preference for the "expert role" model. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The identified factors may permit care to be tailored to the most probable expectations as regard decision-making. Since the populations concerned may be vulnerable and suffer inequalities in the provision of health services, promoting participation in the care process could help improve clinical parameters ethically.

Compulsory admissions and preferences in decision-making in patients with psychotic and bipolar disorders.

PURPOSE: Participation in medical decisions and taking into account patients' values and preferences are especially important for psychiatric patients who may be treated against their will. The increasing rates of coercive measures and the underlying clinical, ethical, and legal issues highlight the need to examine their use in psychiatry. Although limited congruence in decision-making preferences may be on the basis of these coercive practices, this issue has not been adequately addressed. We explore the relationship between compulsory admissions and congruence in decision-making preferences in mental health settings. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among 107 outpatients with DSM diagnoses of schizophrenia of bipolar disorder using the Control Preference Scale to assess congruence in decision-making experienced and preferred style. History of compulsory admissions was obtained through review of available records. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were used. RESULTS: 70% of patients reported experiencing their preferred style of decision-making and 44% patients had history of compulsory admissions. These patients were more autonomous and preferred to take a more active role. The degree of congruence was lower in patients with previous compulsory admissions. The best predictors of compulsory admissions were not having a regular doctor and the unmatched participation preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experienced a different level of participation in decision-making than desired more frequently had compulsory admissions. We propose to assess participation preferences each time a relevant treatment decision is about to be made and tailor care accordingly. We identified several factors leading to compulsory admissions that can be modified to prevent further coercive measures.

Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients´ preferences and associated factors.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Over the last years, traditional paternalistic model is being questioned. Shared Decision-Making (SDM) model has been proposed as a way to improve patient-physician interaction. Little is known to what extent people with severe mental illness want to be involved in decision-making process. This study evaluates their preferences about making clinical decisions and which variables influence these desires. METHOD: One hundred seven patients with DSM diagnoses of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia and 100 Non Psychiatric Comparison (NPC) subjects recruited from mental health and primary care departments completed a self-reported questionnaire about preferences in decision-making process. Demographic and clinical information was obtained through review of available records and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: Patients and NPCs differed as regards their preferences about their participation in medical decisions. NPCs were 18 times more likely to prefer options about their treatment and 2 times more likely to prefer to take medical decisions by their own than psychiatric patients. The best predictors of the preference of a SDM model were a lower BPRS global score and the absence of previous compulsory admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric patients more frequently preferred a passive role in the decision-making process. Interventions to promote SDM should be tailored to the values and needs of each patient because not everyone wants to participate to the same degree. We found several factors to take into account in patient engagement in SDM as these populations may be more vulnerable.

Willingness of patients with SUD to participate in research: prevalence and associated factors. / Disposición para participar en investigación en población adicta: prevalencia y factores asociados.

Greater attention is focusing on the motivations of subjects recruited for research protocols, especially in vulnerable populations. Although addiction is a highly stigmatized condition, very little research has focused on the factors influencing the decision to participate of patients with an addiction. Our aim is to gather further evidence in relation to the motivations of people with Substance Use Disorders (SUD), comparing their reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of 53 subjects with DSM-5 diagnoses of SUD and 50 controls. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research were documented and correlated with several variables. There were no significant differences in willingness to participate in research and reasons for doing so between SUD and controls. Among SUD subjects, 59% mentioned altruism, 53.8% expected therapeutic benefits, and 43.6% desired to help others; none mentioned money. Of those patients with SUD who refused to participate in research, 69.2% cited aversion and 46.2% mentioned risk. Willingness to participate was correlated with higher computer literacy and better cognitive performance. In the multivariate analysis, aversion was a significant predictor of willingness to participate in research. When research is not related to their diagnosis, the motivations of SUD and controls are similar and flowed logically from the study. However, elements associated with therapeutic misconceptions were also evident. Therefore, negative views about the motivations of SUD subjects' participation in research are unfounded. Consequently, to improve study recruitment, assessments may be targeted to specific vulnerabilities rather than to diagnoses.

Cada vez se presta más atención a las motivaciones de las personas reclutadas para ensayos clínicos, especialmente si pertenecen a colectivos vulnerables. Aunque la participación en investigación de las personas con trastorno por uso de sustancias (TUS) suscita estereotipos negativos, muy pocos estudios se han centrado en los factores que influyen en la misma. Nuestro objetivo es analizar sus motivaciones comparando las razones y la disposición a participar en un ensayo hipotético de 53 pacientes con diagnósticos DSM-5 de TUS y 50 controles. Las respuestas que dieron a la entrevista MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research se correlacionaron con diversas variables. No encontramos diferencias significativas entre ambas poblaciones en términos de motivaciones y disposición a participar. El 59% de la población TUS mencionó altruismo, un 53,8% esperaba beneficio terapéutico, y el 43,6% deseaba ayudar a otros. De los pacientes con TUS que rechazaron participar, el 69,2% alegó miedo y el 46,2% incomodidad por los riesgos. La disposición a participar se relacionó con un mayor nivel cognitivo y de alfabetización informática. En el análisis multivariante, la aversión a la investigación permaneció como factor predictivo significativo de la disposición a participar. Cuando la investigación no está relacionada con su diagnóstico, las motivaciones de la población TUS son similares a las de los controles y se deducen lógicamente del estudio, aunque también se evidenciaron elementos de "error terapéutico". Por consiguiente, las visiones negativas sobre las motivaciones de los TUS como participantes en investigación son infundadas. Para mejorar el reclutamiento, las valoraciones deben dirigirse a vulnerabilidades especificas en lugar de al diagnóstico.

Disposición para participar en investigación en población adicta: prevalencia y factores asociados / Willingness of patients with SUD to participate in research: prevalence and associated factors

Cada vez se presta más atención a las motivaciones de las personas reclutadas para ensayos clínicos, especialmente si pertenecen a colectivos vulnerables. Aunque la participación en investigación de las personas con trastorno por uso de sustancias (TUS) suscita estereotipos negativos, muy pocos estudios se han centrado en los factores que influyen en la misma. Nuestro objetivo es analizar sus motivaciones comparando las razones y la disposición a participar en un ensayo hipotético de 53 pacientes con diagnósticos DSM-5 de TUS y 50 controles. Las respuestas que dieron a la entrevista MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research se correlacionaron con diversas variables. No encontramos diferencias significativas entre ambas poblaciones en términos de motivaciones y disposición a participar. El 59% de la población TUS mencionó altruismo, un 53,8% esperaba beneficio terapéutico, y el 43,6% deseaba ayudar a otros. De los pacientes con TUS que rechazaron participar, el 69,2% alegó miedo y el 46,2% incomodidad por los riesgos. La disposición a participar se relacionó con un mayor nivel cognitivo y de alfabetización informática. En el análisis multivariante, la aversión a la investigación permaneció como factor predictivo significativo de la disposición a participar. Cuando la investigación no está relacionada con su diagnóstico, las motivaciones de la población TUS son similares a las de los controles y se deducen lógicamente del estudio, aunque también se evidenciaron elementos de "error terapéutico". Por consiguiente, las visiones negativas sobre las motivaciones de los TUS como participantes en investigación son infundadas. Para mejorar el reclutamiento, las valoraciones deben dirigirse a vulnerabilidades especificas en lugar de al diagnóstico

Greater attention is focusing on the motivations of subjects recruited for research protocols, especially in vulnerable populations. Although addiction is a highly stigmatized condition, very little research has focused on the factors influencing the decision to participate of patients with an addiction. Our aim is to gather further evidence in relation to the motivations of people with Substance Use Disorders (SUD), comparing their reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of 53 subjects with DSM-5 diagnoses of SUD and 50 controls. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research were documented and correlated with several variables. There were no significant differences in willingness to participate in research and reasons for doing so between SUD and controls. Among SUD subjects, 59% mentioned altruism, 53.8% expected therapeutic benefits, and 43.6% desired to help others; none mentioned money. Of those patients with SUD who refused to participate in research, 69.2% cited aversion and 46.2% mentioned risk. Willingness to participate was correlated with higher computer literacy and better cognitive performance. In the multivariate analysis, aversion was a significant predictor of willingness to participate in research. When research is not related to their diagnosis, the motivations of SUD and controls are similar and flowed logically from the study. However, elements associated with therapeutic misconceptions were also evident. Therefore, negative views about the motivations of SUD subjects’ participation in research are unfounded. Consequently, to improve study recruitment, assessments may be targeted to specific vulnerabilities rather than to diagnoses

Assessment of Motivations and Willingness to Participate in Research of Outpatients With Anxiety, Mood, and Psychotic Disorders.

The motivations of participants recruited for research, especially from potentially vulnerable populations, have received increasing attention. The present investigation compares the motivations and willingness to participate in research of 134 psychiatric outpatients and 50 controls. The willingness to participate of both groups was similar. We found a higher proportion of psychiatric admissions and a higher degree of computer literacy among those willing to participate. Regardless of their decision concerning participation, the reasons given by the members of both groups were logical and concordant with the related literature. This suggests that negative views about the motivations of psychiatric patients to act as research participants are unfounded. Efforts should focus on the predictors of willingness to participate that we have identified for improving recruitment. The implications of these results for research are discussed.

Valoración de la capacidad de toma de decisiones en investigación: cuándo, cómo y por qué realizarla / Assessment of decision-making capacity for research participation: when, how and why to do it

No disponible

Assessing the decision-making capacity of the addicted population to take part in research: myths, barriers, and benefits. / Valoración de la capacidad para participar en investigación en población adicta: mitos, barreras y beneficios.

Letter to the editor.

Resumen: el consentimiento informado constituye un elemento clave para una investigación ética. La población adicta puede tener deteriorada su capacidad para consentir por varios motivos. Las drogodependencias representan un campo idóneo para un análisis bioético porque implican conflictos de valores a diversos niveles. Constituyen un problema complejo en el que interaccionan intereses económicos, políticos, sociales, y sanitarios. Analizamos las implicaciones de estas cuestiones para la práctica clínica y la investigación con personas con trastornos adictivos y damos unas directrices sobre cuándo, cómo y por qué llevar a cabo valoraciones de la capacidad para participar en investigación.

Valoración de la capacidad para participar en investigación en población adicta: mitos, barreras y beneficios / Assessing the decision-making capacity of the addicted population to take part in research: myths, barriers, and benefits

No disponible