ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of minimally invasive techniques has expanded the use of plates and improved their safety for the repair of humeral diaphyseal fractures with proximal extension. In this study, we aimed to determine the best contouring method for long locking plates in the repair of humeral fractures using this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparative observations were performed between helical and spiral modelling in plastic models to identify which shape best fits the contours of the humerus. To determine the best shape, we attempted to assess the torsion required for the plate to settle laterally in the greater tuberosity and anteriorly in the diaphyseal region of the humerus. After establishing the best approach, we transferred the method to two anatomical specimens and confirmed the viability of the method and pathways. Additionally, to confirm the clinical applicability of the method, we applied the method in ten patients. RESULTS: After placing the plates in the bone models, it was found that the helical plate was more distant from the bone. On the other hand, the spiral plate achieved better accommodation along the contours of the humerus. The amount of twist was tested at 50°, 70° and 90°. When the plate was twisted at 70°, it maintained contact with the greater tuberosity proximally and the anterior cortical diaphyseal region. Eight patients completed the follow-up. Radiographic consolidation and good functional outcomes were achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral modelling at 70° allows anatomical accommodation at the greater tuberosity proximally and in the diaphyseal region.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Prosthesis Fitting/methods , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Joint , Diaphyses/injuries , Diaphyses/surgery , Equipment Design , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Radiography/methods , Recovery of Function , Shoulder Injuries , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Background Pathologic conditions of the sesamoids can be a source of disabling pain for patients, particularly during toe-off. Some underlying causes include osteonecrosis, inflammation, arthritis, and fracture. Nonoperative treatment is the initial standard of care, and has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes overall; however, operative management may be indicated in cases of pain refractory to conservative management. Sesamoidectomy is an uncommon procedure with risk of potential complications, but may be warranted in select cases of failed nonoperative treatment. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at one institution from 2009 to 2018. Twelve patients diagnosed with fibular sesamoiditis were treated with sesamoidectomy. Baseline patient demographics as well as postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results All 12 patients underwent fibular sesamoidectomy using the plantar approach following which their symptom (pain) resolved. Average follow-up for this cohort was 35 months. Of the sample, two patients experienced transient neuritis, one patient developed a superficial infection, and one had painful postoperative scarring. Hallux varus deformity was not observed in any patients. Conclusion Fibular sesamoidectomy may be a safe, viable procedure for patients with sesamoiditis who fail conservative measures.
