Paclitaxel plus ifosfamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: While ovarian cancer is one of the most sensitive cancers to cytotoxic drugs, with objective response rates of 60-80% routinely being reported in previously untreated patients, the majority of individuals with advanced disease ultimately relapse. Paclitaxel, a new and novel antimicrotubule agent, has shown activity as a salvage therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. More importantly, in a prior study, it has been shown to be active in tumors that have displayed resistance to platinum compounds, with a reported response rate of 20%. Ifosfamide has shown activity in the treatment of patients who previously demonstrated clinical resistance to a platinum-cyclophosphamide combination. Recently, a synergistic activity of Taxol combined with ifosfamide has been reported in ovarian cell lines. Based on these data, a phase I/II study of a combination treatment with paclitaxel and ifosfamide was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with recurrent ovarian cancer or ovarian cancer refractory to cisplatin (CDDP)-containing regimens were treated with paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m2 on day 1; ifosfamide was administered at 1 g/m2 on days 2 and 3 for the first cycle and 1.5 and 2 g/m2 with the same schedule in cycles 2 and 3, respectively. In the absence of toxicity, the dose of ifosfamide was maintained at 2 g/m2 for the last three cycles. Cytotoxic therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A 30% overall objective response rate was achieved in the 30 patients assessable for response. Among 21 platinum-resistant patients, 4 partial responses (19%) were observed, while in the 9 platinum-sensitive patients 2 complete responses and 3 partial responses (55%) were observed. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity. Leukopenia (WHO grade 3-4) occurred in 10% of patients who received ifosfamide at a dose of 1 g/m2 and in 18% of patients treated with ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2. CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed a low activity of paclitaxel in platinum-resistant patients. The results of this combination treatment with paclitaxel-ifosfamide in our platinum-sensitive patients support further investigations in a randomized study of the combination regimen against paclitaxel alone or retreatment with organoplatinum compounds.

Four-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy with double hematopoietic progenitor-cell rescue for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: High-dose chemotherapy produces high complete remission (CR) rates and some survival advantage in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). A current issue is the possibility that these patients may have an even better prognosis with multiple high-dose treatments. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of a four-step, high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDSC) with double autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell rescue. We also tested the hypothesis that peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) harvested following a single recruitment with cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allow the safe administration of the whole HDSC with closely timed repeated courses of several non-cross-resistant agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment plan included CY 7 g/m2, followed by GM-CSF 5 to 7 micrograms/kg/d administered by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 2 to 14; PBPCs with or without bone marrow (BM) harvest; mitoxantrone (NOV) 60, 75, or 90 mg/m2 plus melphalan (L-PAM) 140 to 180 mg/m2 with hematopoietic rescue; methotrexate (MTX) 8 g/m2 plus vincristine (VCR) 1.4 mg/m2; and etoposide (VP-16) 1.5 g/m2 plus carboplatin (PP) 1.5 g/m2 with hematopoietic rescue. RESULTS: All 15 patients enrolled completed the entire treatment and there were no toxic deaths. Hematologic reconstitution was good at each step. The median number of days with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 100/microL and platelet count less than 20,000/microL were 8 and 3, respectively, after NOV plus L-PAM, and 7 and 4, respectively, after VP-16 plus PP. The main non-hematologic toxicity was mucositis, while organ toxicity was mild and reversible. CONCLUSION: This regimen is feasible, with acceptable toxicity. GM-CSF and PBPCs have a pivotal role, as they hasten hematologic reconstitution, abate toxicity, and allow rapid recycling.

Combination of epirubicin and lonidamine for treatment of advanced breast cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that lonidamine potentiates the cytotoxic effect of anthracyclines in simultaneous and sequential combination. On the basis of such evidence, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of epirubicin plus lonidamine in advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Between January 1991 and November 1993, 33 patients with advanced breast cancer, age < 75 years and PS < 2, were treated with epirubicin (75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, every 3 weeks), plus lonidamine (450 mg/day orally from day 1 continuously until disease progression). RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for response: 4 achieved complete response (13%) and 8 partial response (27%) (total response rate = 40%), 6 (20%) had stabilization of disease, and 12 (40%) progression of disease. The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 4-24+ months). This scheme was tolerated, with a mild additional toxicity related to lonidamine: only WHO grade III myalgia in 1 patient (3%) and epigastralgia in 3 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although some patients seem to have benefited from the combination at the dose levels of the drug used in the study, the therapeutic advantages of addition of lonidamine remain unclear.