Oncologic Outcomes for Different Axillary Staging Techniques in Patients with Nodal-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systematic Treatment: A Cancer Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted approaches such as targeted axillary dissection (TAD) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) showed false-negative rates of < 10% compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). We aimed to evaluate real-world oncologic outcomes for different axillary staging techniques. METHODS: We identified nodal-positive breast cancer patients undergoing NAST from 2016 to 2021 from the state cancer registry of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate Cox regression models (adjusted for age, ypN stage, ypT stage, and tumor biologic subtype). RESULTS: A total of 2698 patients with a median follow-up of 24.7 months were identified: 2204 underwent ALND, 460 underwent SLNB (255 with ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes [SLNs] removed, 205 with 1-2 SLNs removed), and 34 underwent TAD. iDFS 3 years after surgery was 69.7% (ALND), 76.6% (SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed), 76.7% (SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed), and 78.7% (TAD). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant influence of different axillary staging techniques on iDFS (hazard ratio [HR] for SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.50; HR for SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.3; HR for TAD 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-1.64; ALND reference), and for ypN+ (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.49-2.49), triple-negative breast cancer (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.06), and ypT3-4 (HR 2.93, 95% CI 2.02-4.24). CONCLUSION: These real-world data provide evidence that patient selection for de-escalated axillary surgery for patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing NAST was successfully adopted and no early alarm signals of iDFS detriment were detected.

[Incidence, therapy, and prognosis of prostate cancer in Baden-Württemberg: analysis based on cancer registry data]. / Inzidenz, Behandlung und Prognose des Prostatakarzinoms in Baden-Württemberg: Analyse anhand von Krebsregisterdaten.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid tumor in men in Germany. Collection of epidemiological and clinical data has been centralized for several years due to legal requirements via the state cancer registries. Thus, the reporting of diagnosis, therapy, and progression of cancer is obligatory in Germany. These data needs to be processed based on the questions of the treating physicians. OBJECTIVES: Intention of this work was to present the development of new cases, disease stages, treatment procedures and prognosis of PCa in Baden-Württemberg (BW). METHODS: For this purpose, data of the cancer registry BW regarding patients with PCa first diagnosed between 2013 and 2021 were evaluated. The evaluation was performed using descriptive statistics, Χ2 test and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84,347 new diagnoses of PCa were reported. Clinical stage was present in 55.3% of patients. Assignment by International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) groups was present in 75.7%. A steady increase in primary diagnosis was evident through 2019. The proportion of primary metastatic disease decreased (2013: 19.6% vs. 2021: 12.0%), and the proportion of localized tumors increased (2013: 65.5% vs. 2021: 77.1%). Radical prostatectomy (RP) dominated the treatment of localized tumors with a mean of 60.1%. The proportion of robot-assisted surgery increased from 23.7% (2013) to 60.8% (2021) with a decrease in the R1 rate from 34.8 to 26.2%. Progression-free survival correlated closely with tumor stage and ISUP group. CONCLUSION: An increase in PCa cases and a decrease of advanced tumors were observed. Treatment was mostly surgical in localized stages, with increasing proportion of robotic-assisted RP. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for long-term prognosis.

Clinical Characterization of HCC/CCA Mixed Cancers in a Population-based Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Primary liver cancer (PLC) ranks among of the most common cancers worldwide. Within this group, a minority of cases displays characteristics of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), known as combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC- CCA). Currently, there is no specific standardized therapy for these mixed tumors. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze the clinical course, treatment and outcome of cHCC-CCA patients in a European population-based registry. METHODS: We investigated 9,144 patients with PLC (6,622 HCC, 2,356 iCCA, and 166 cHCC-CCA) diagnosed between 2009 and 2020. All data were obtained from Clinical Cancer Registry of Baden-Württemberg (BW), Germany. RESULTS: In all three groups patients were predominantly male (82%, 57%, and 68% for HCC, iCCA and cHCC-CCA groups, respectively). 48% of cHCC-CCA patients were diagnosed as stage IV cancers, which was more than for HCC (31%) but less compared to CCA (64%). Overall median survival of cHCC-CCA patients was worse compared to HCC (9-13 months vs. 15.5 months, p<0.001) and rather comparable to CCA (11.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that cHCC-CCA tumors appear to have a distinct clinical course with worse overall survival compared to HCC. Thus, identification of these cancers by histopathology is essential in order to further characterize this tumor entity and to provide accurate treatment to these patients.