Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hepatol Forum ; 5(3): 100-105, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006139

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: The histological diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is challenging. A new consensus recommendation was provided by the International AIH Pathology Group to address the problems in the histological diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to compare the 2008 'simplified' criteria for AIH with the 'consensus recommendation' of 2022 in terms of diagnostic sensitivity. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pathological specimens of patients diagnosed with Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) between 2010 and 2022. Out of 188 patients enlisted, 88 were selected based on exclusion criteria. The specimens were examined by two experienced hepatopathologists and a resident pathologist. All specimens were analyzed using both the "simplified" criteria and the new consensus recommendations. Results: Out of a total of 78 patients, the 2022 consensus recommendations raised the diagnostic category of 16 patients (20.5%) to a higher level. Six patients who were previously diagnosed as "atypical" were now considered "possible AIH", while 10 patients with a "compatible" diagnosis were elevated to "likely AIH" category. No patients were found to fall into a lower diagnostic category according to the new recommendations. A significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity was observed between the 2008 criteria and the 2022 consensus report (p<0.001). Conclusion: The 2022 consensus recommendation may be more sensitive in the diagnosis of AIH in comparison to the 2008 'simplified' histological criteria. More studies are needed both for the validation of the sensitivity of the new consensus recommendation and for the determination of the specificity.

2.
Echocardiography ; 41(1): e15730, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a common, effective and reliable treatment modality for portal hypertension. Migration of the TIPS stent into the right atrium is a rare and fatal complication. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of severe tricuspid regurgitation caused by a stent migrating into the right atrium in a patient hospitalized with refractory ascites due to cirrhosis. DISCUSSION: In this case, it is noteworthy that secondary stenting, which is necessary especially in cases of occlusion, significantly increases the risk of migration. CONCLUSION: Although a rare complication, intracardiac stent migration should be considered in patients with a history of TIPS in the presence of a new heart murmur and signs of arrhythmia.


Subject(s)
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Stents/adverse effects , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging
3.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 27(1): e14967, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057290

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the choice of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/ts-DMARDs), factors associated with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and mortality in RA patients with CKD receiving b/ts-DMARDs. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred forty-one RA (79.4% female) patients were included in the analysis from the HUR-BIO prospective registry. Patients were divided into the CKD group and the non-CKD group. Age and gender-matched patients were selected from the non-CKD group, and then three main groups were determined. CKD was staged according to the glomerular filtration rate criteria. The clinical characteristics of the patients, disease activities, treatment choices, drug retention rate, and mortality rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: CKD was detected in 90/2141 (4.2%) RA patients on b/ts-DMARDs. Forty patients (2.3%) developed CKD during follow-up after the initiation of b/ts-DMARDs. In the CKD group, anti-TNF agents were chosen as the first-line b/ts-DMARDs therapy in 64.4% of patients, with etanercept leading in 31 (34.4%) patients. In multivariate analysis, age at the start of treatment, DAS-28-ESR at last visit, amyloidosis, hypertension, and history of smoking were the factors associated with the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts-DMARDs. The mortality rate in RA-CKD patients until the onset of the pandemic was 15.41 per 1000 patient years, whereas it was 85.9 per 1000 patient years after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities and control of disease activity are critical in the development of CKD in RA patients receiving b/ts-DMARDs. While there was no significant difference in mortality rate between CKD and non-CKD patients, the overall mortality rate increased after the COVID-19 pandemic duration in both groups.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Female , Male , Pandemics , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Biological Products/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology
4.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 32(3): 367-370, 2023 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently malignancies of the liver are the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. The admission of patients to hospitals decreased due to the restriction of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, especially patients suspected with cancer were delayed in their diagnosis and treatment. With this study, we aimed to investigate whether the Covid-19 pandemic caused a decrease in the number of hepatocellular cancers (HCC) or a delay in its diagnosis. METHODS: The study, which included newly diagnosed HCC patients, was conducted as a retrospective cross sectional study, in a single Turkey medical center. The patients were divided into pre-COVID-19 and post- COVID-19 two-year periods and compared in terms of tumor size, biochemical parameters, clinical and demographic features. RESULTS: A total of 63 HCC patients, 46 (73%) patients before the COVID-19 pandemic and 17 (27%) patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Maximum diameter of lesions and serum alpha- fetoprotein levels showed a statistically significant difference between the groups. Maximum tumor size in the pre-COVID-19 period was 4.58±3.77 mm, while in the COVID-19 period was 7.42±6.88 mm, the difference between two groups being statistically significant (p<0.05). HCC in the pre-COVID-19 period were detected mostly at Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (45.7%, n=21), while in the COVID-19 period most of HCC were detected at stage B (35.3%, n=6). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic limited the access of patients to screening programs for HCC. The significant disruption in screening cirrhotic patients for HCC has led to a delay in diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Turkey/epidemiology , Neoplasm Staging , COVID-19/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...