Understanding the impact of the COVID-19-related lockdown in university workers. Identifying groups through cluster analysis.

Objective: To analyse the COVID-19-related lockdown impact on University workers, to identify groups based on this information, and to study the factors associated with each group. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A survey was conducted 3.5 weeks after COVID-19-related lockdown in University workers in Spain. Sociodemographic variables, housing, work, health conditions, levels of anxiety, stress and depression (DASS-21), and social support (MSPSS) were collected. A cluster analysis was performed to identify groups depending on the impact of the lockdown. Differences between groups were tested using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U tests, and associated factors with binary logistic regression. Results: We identified two groups of workers. "G1: Consequences in the daily life routine" was mainly composed of men, Research and Teaching Personnel (RTP) with more stable professional categories, higher income level, and bigger houses than people in G2. Participants in "G2: Concerns for the current and future well-being" presented worse intensity of pain than before the lockdown, more anxiety, depression, stress and less social support than people in G1. ASP (Administration and Services Personnel) had more risk of belonging to G2 than RTP (OR = 5.863). A higher number of people living at home decreased the risk of being in G2 (OR = 0.439). People with lower pain intensity had less risk of being in G2 (OR = 0.014), and this risk decreased as friends support increased (OR = 0.833). Conclusions: In G1, the consequences were immediately reflected in the stress resulting from changes in their daily work routine. In G2, the concerns were related to their professional future, with worse mental health, greater intensity of pain and less social support.

Factores psicológicos asociados a la adherencia al tratamiento analgésico en pacientes con dolor crónico: revisión sistemática de la literatura / Psychological factors associated with the adherence to analgesic treatment in patients with chronic pain: systematic review of the literature

Introducción: La falta de adherencia terapéutica es frecuente en pacientes con dolor crónico (DC) y la influencia de factores psicológicos sobre ella puede ser relevante. El objetivo del estudio es analizar los factores psicológicos relacionados con la adherencia al tratamiento analgésico en paciente con DC. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática donde se incluyeron artículos originales publicados en inglés y castellano entre junio de 2009 y junio de 2019 incluidos en Pudmed, Scopus, Web of Science y PsycINFO. Se incluyeron artículos con diseño transversal y longitudinal, llevados a cabo en una población > 18 años con dolor crónico no oncológico (DCNO) y que analizaban cualquier variable psicológica en relación con la adherencia al tratamiento analgésico. Los términos de búsqueda fueron "adherence", "compliance", "misuse", "analgesic", "chronic pain" y "psychology". La calidad de los artículos incluidos se analizó mediante la Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-sectional studies de Joanna Briggs Institute para los estudios transversales y Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies para los longitudinales. Resultados: Se identificaron 1184 artículos, de los cuales 14 fueron finalmente seleccionados. La depresión fue la variable más estudiada, incluida en 11 artículos, seguida de la ansiedad, que apareció en 6. Tanto la depresión como la ansiedad se asociaron de manera constante y significativa con una menor adherencia al tratamiento analgésico, y lo mismo fue cierto en dos de los artículos que miden conjuntamente la relación de ansiedad y depresión en la adherencia analgésica (efecto negativo alto 39,1 % vs. efecto negativo bajo 8,3 %, p = 0,013). Se encontró que las estrategias de afrontamiento activas se asociaban con infrauso (OR = 1,132, IC 95 %: 1,027-1,249, p = 0,013) y las pobres estrategias de afrontamiento se relacionaron con un mal uso de los opioides (p = 0,01)...(AU)

Introduction: The lack of adherence is frequent in chronic pain (CP) patients and the influence of psychological factors may play a relevant role. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychological factors related to the adherence to analgesic treatment in patients with CP. Methodology: A systematic review was carried out, including original articles published in English and Spanish between June-2009 and June-2019 included in Pudmed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Articles with cross-sectional and longitudinal design were included, carried out in a population >18 years with chronic non-oncological pain (CNOP) and that analyzed any psychological variable in relation to adherence to analgesic treatment. The search terms were "adherence", "compliance", "misuse", "analgesic", "chronic pain" and "psychology". The quality of the articles included was analysed through the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-sectional studies of Joanna Briggs Institute for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies for the longitudinal studies. Results: A total of 1184 articles were initially identified, and 14 were finally selected. Depression was the most studied variable, being included in 11 articles, fo­­llowed by anxiety, that appeared in 6. Both depression and anxiety were repeatedly associated with lo­­wer adhe­rence to analgesic treatment, and the same was true in two of the articles that measured jointly the relationship of anxiety and depression on analgesic adherence (high negative affect 39.1 % vs. low negative affect 8,3 %, p = 0.013). Active coping strategies were found to be associated with underuse (OR = 1.132, 95 % CI: 1.027-1.249, p = 0.013) and poor coping strategies were associated with opioid misuse (p = 0.01)...(AU)

[Effects of virtual reality on balance and gait in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Efectos de la realidad virtual sobre el equilibrio y la marcha en el ictus: revision sistematica y metaanalisis.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adulthood. Recently the improvement of virtual reality technologies has been used in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. AIM: To review published research literature on the effects of the virtual reality interventions vs conventional therapy on balance and gait in stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed during March 2018 in the databases: PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Medline at EBSCO. The selection criteria were: randomized controlled trials published in English or Spanish during the past ten years. The PEDro scale evaluated the quality of the methods used in the studies. A total of 14 clinical trials were included in the systemic review, of which 10 contributed information to the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Favourable results were found on balance (Berg Balance Scale: standardized mean difference, SMD = -1.89; 95% CI: -2.72 to -1.07; Timed Up and Go, SMD: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.03-1.81), and gait (GaitRite platform: cadence, SMD: -1.51, 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.97; step length, SMD: -1.63, 95% CI: -2.18 to -1.08; stride length, SMD: -1.63, 95% CI: -2.18 to -1.08; velocity, SMD: -1.58, 95% CI: -2.97 to -0.18). CONCLUSION: The results show the potential benefit of virtual reality interventions to recover balance and gait after stroke.

TITLE: Efectos de la realidad virtual sobre el equilibrio y la marcha en el ictus: revision sistematica y metaanalisis.Introduccion. El ictus es la mayor causa de discapacidad en los adultos. En los ultimos años, la mejora en las tecnologias de realidad virtual ha propiciado su uso para la rehabilitacion de pacientes de ictus. Objetivo. Analizar las evidencias cientificas existentes sobre la efectividad del uso de realidad virtual frente a la terapia convencional en la mejora de la marcha y el equilibrio de pacientes que han sufrido un ictus. Pacientes y metodos. Se ha realizado una revision sistematica y un metaanalisis durante marzo de 2018 en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library y Medline via EBSCO. Los principales criterios de seleccion fueron ensayos clinicos controlados aleatorizados, publicados en ingles o español, durante los ultimos diez años (2008-2018). La calidad metodologica de los estudios se evaluo mediante la escala PEDro. Se incluyo un total de 14 ensayos clinicos aleatorizados con intervenciones de realidad virtual en la revision sistematica, 10 de ellos en el metaanalisis. Resultados. Se han obtenido resultados favorables de las intervenciones de realidad virtual sobre el equilibrio (Berg Balance Scale: diferencia de medias estandarizada, DME: ­1,89; intervalo de confianza al 95%, IC 95%: ­2,72 a ­1,07; Timed Up and Go: DME: 1,42; IC 95%: 1,03 a 1,81) y la marcha (GaitRite: cadencia, DME: ­1,51, IC 95%: ­2,05 a ­0,97; longitud del paso, DME: ­1,63, IC 95%: ­2,18 a ­1,08; longitud de la zancada, DME: ­1,63, IC 95%: ­2,18 a ­1,08; velocidad, DME: ­1,58, IC 95%: ­2,97 a ­0,18). Conclusion. Los resultados obtenidos muestran el beneficio potencial de la realidad virtual sobre la recuperacion de la marcha y equilibrio en sujetos que han sufrido ictus.

Physical therapy in Down syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal abnormality, with a worldwide incidence of around 0.1% in live births. It is related to several conditions in which the physical therapy could take action-preventing co-morbidities. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy in Down syndrome, to know and compare the effectiveness of different physical therapy interventions in this population. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were conducted. The search was performed during June 2018 in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Scopus. The studies were selected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale evaluated the quality of the methods used in the studies. Subsequently, the data were extracted, and statistical analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS: A total of 27 articles were included, of which nine contributed information to the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis showed favourable results for the strength of upper and lower limbs [standardised mean difference (SMD) = 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.77-2.15); and SMD = 2.04; 95% CI: (1.07-3.01)] and mediolateral oscillations of balance [SMD = -3.30; 95% CI: (-5.34 to -1.26)]. CONCLUSIONS: The results show the potential benefit of certain types of physical therapy interventions, specifically in strength and balance, in people with Down syndrome. There are still many aspects to clarify and new lines of research.

Analyzing the research in Integrative & Complementary Medicine by means of science mapping.

OBJECTIVES: The research in the Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) field is analyzed according to the journals indexed in ISI Web of Science. Science Mapping Analysis (SMA) is used to provide and overview of the conceptual evolution of the CAM field. METHODS: The software SciMAT is used to detect and visualize the hidden themes and their evolution over a consecutive span of years. It combines SMA and performance analysis. Twenty one journals related to CAM were analyzed, in four consecutive periods from 1974 to 2011. RESULTS: Strategic diagrams and the thematic evolution of CAM, together with performance indicators (h-index), were obtained. The results show that CAM research has focused on seven main thematic areas: MEDICINAL-PLANTS, CHIROPRACTIC-AND-LOW-BACK-PAIN, ACUPUNCTURE-AND-PAIN, CELL-PROCESSES-AND-DISEASES, LIPID-PEROXIDATION and DIABETES-AND-INSULIN. CONCLUSION: The research output could be used by the scientific community to identify thematic areas on which interest is focused.