ABSTRACT
We studied the use of three biocompatible materials obtained by plasma polymerization of pyrrole (PPy), pyrrole doped with iodine (PPy/I) and a copolymer formed with pyrrole and polyethylene glycol (PPy/PEG), implanted, separately, after a complete spinal cord transection in rats. Motor function assessed with the BBB scale and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the implanted rats were studied. Results showed that the highest motor recovery was obtained in rats with PPy/I implants. They also showed a significant reduction in the latency of SEPs. Histological analyses showed no signs of implant rejection; on the contrary, implants based on PPy improved the SEPs conduction and motor function after lesion.
Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials , Plasma Gases , Polymers/administration & dosage , Prostheses and Implants , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Animals , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Female , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Rats , Rats, Long-Evans , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapyABSTRACT
Most of the biomaterials used nowadays for the reconstruction of the spinal cord (SC) tissue after an injury, tested in animals, have obtained modest results. This work presents a study about the compatibility of two novel, non-biodegradable, semi-conductive materials, obtained by plasma polymerization: iodine-doped pyrrole (PPy/I) and pyrrole-polyethylene glycol (PPy/PEG). Both polymers, separately, were implanted in the SC tissue of rats after a transection. Prior to implantation, the elemental composition and the physico-chemical properties of polymers were studied by electron scanning microscopy, IR Spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. We used adult female Long Evans rats, subjected to SC transection. Animals were randomized to be allocated in one of the treatment groups and were killed four weeks after the lesion for histology study. Results showed that both implants were integrated to the SC tissue, as inflammatory and gliotic responses, similar to those observed in the control group, and rejection of the implant, were not evident. Moreover, the immediate effect of PPy/I or PPy/PEG in the injured SC prevented secondary tissue destruction, as compared to non-implanted control animals. In conclusion, implants of semi-conductive polymers were well-tolerated and integrated favorably to SC tissue after transection.
