Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 31(2): 159-168, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042706

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution and quantity of ophthalmic care consumed on Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans, the demographics of the population utilizing these services, and the relationship between ACA insurance coverage plan tier, cost sharing, and total cost of ophthalmic care consumed. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed ACA individual and small group market claims data from the Wakely Affordable Care Act (WACA) 2018 dataset, which contains detailed claims, enrollment, and premium data from Edge Servers for 3.9 million individual and small group market lives. We identified all enrollees with ophthalmology-specific billing, procedure, and national drug codes. We then analyzed the claims by plan type and calculated the total cost and out-of-pocket (OOP) cost. RESULTS: Among 3.9 million enrollees in the WACA 2018 dataset, 538,169 (13.7%) had claims related to ophthalmology procedures, medications, and/or diagnoses. A total of $203 million was generated in ophthalmology-related claims, with $54 million in general services, $42 million in medications, $20 million in diagnostics and imaging, and $86 million in procedures. Average annual OOP costs were $116 per member, or 30.9% of the total cost, and were lowest for members with platinum plans (16% OOP) and income-driven cost sharing reduction (ICSR) subsidies (17% OOP). Despite stable ocular disease distribution across plan types, beneficiaries with silver ICSR subsidies consumed more total care than any other plan, higher than platinum plan enrollees and almost 1.5× the cost of bronze plan enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic care for enrollees on ACA plans generated substantial costs in 2018. Plans with higher OOP cost sharing may result in lower utilization of ophthalmic care.


Subject(s)
Health Insurance Exchanges , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humans , Cost Sharing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health , United States
2.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(1)2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35101868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Annual albuminuria screening detects the early stages of nephropathy in individuals with diabetes. Because early detection of albuminuria allows for interventions that lower the risk of developing chronic kidney disease, guidelines recommend annual testing for all individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and for those with type 1 diabetes for at least 5 years. However, at the Eskind Diabetes Clinic at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, testing occurred less frequently than desired. METHODS: A quality improvement team first analysed the clinic's processes, identifying the lack of a systematic approach to testing as the likely cause for the low rate. The team then implemented two successive interventions in a pilot of patients seen by nurse practitioners in the clinic. In the first intervention, staff used a dashboard within the electronic health record while triaging each patient, pending an albuminuria order if testing had not been done within the past year. In the second intervention, clinic leadership sent daily reminders to the triage staff. A statistical process control chart tracked monthly testing rates. RESULTS: After 6 months, annual albuminuria testing increased from a baseline of 69% to 82%, with multiple special-cause signals in the control chart. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrates that a series of simple interventions can significantly impact annual albuminuria testing. This project's success likely hinged on using an existing workflow to systematically determine if a patient was due for testing and prompting the provider to sign a pended order for an albuminuria test. Other diabetes/endocrinology and primary care clinics can likely implement a similar process and so improve testing rates in other settings. When coupled with appropriate interventions to reduce the development of chronic kidney disease, such interventions would improve patient outcomes, in addition to better adhering to an established quality metric.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Albuminuria/diagnosis , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Male , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis
3.
Ocul Surf ; 21: 52-57, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887453

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a rare condition characterized by poor corneal sensation and healing. Cenegermin (topical recombinant nerve growth factor) has gained traction as a medical therapy for NK in recent years, and is FDA-approved for patients over two years old. However, no major trials have demonstrated the drug's efficacy in children. This study reviews the outcomes of cenegermin therapy in a pediatric patient population. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients from three tertiary referral institutions who 1) initiated an 8-week course of cenegermin therapy, and 2) were 18 years or less at time of treatment initiation. RESULTS: Eight pediatric patients, with a total of nine affected eyes, underwent cenegermin therapy. All eight patients had previously trialed other NK-specific treatments, none of which had been entirely successful. Five patients (63%) completed the full eight-week therapy course. Five patients (63%) experienced clinical improvement not attributed to another treatment, through improved corneal ulcer stage (n = 5) and best-corrected visual acuity (n = 2). Clinical improvements persisted through a mean recurrence-free period of 10 months. Adverse effects reported during therapy included ocular pain, difficulty sleeping, and continued corneal thinning. CONCLUSION: The results provide modest support for the use of cenegermin in pediatric patients with neurotrophic keratopathy. The primary benefit was an improvement in corneal epithelial stability. Clinicians should be aware that pre-existing corneal scarring in NK may significantly limit the ability of cenegermin alone to improve visual acuity, and should closely monitor the corneal epithelial status during therapy in pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Cornea , Nerve Growth Factor , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Ophthalmic Solutions , Recombinant Proteins , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...