El primer contacto hospitalario a través del Servicio de Urgencias es un predictor independiente de supervivencia global y de supervivencia libre de enfermedad en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal / First hospital contact via the Emergency Department is an independent predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer

Objeto: el objetivo del presente estudio es examinar la asociación entre el tipo de admisión hospitalaria, la supervivencia y las características patológicas de una amplia población de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Métodos: realizamos un estudio en 1.079 pacientes diagnosticados en el Hospital Costa del Sol de Marbella con cáncer colorrectal y evaluamos la relación entre su tasa de supervivencia y la vía por la que realizaron el primer contacto con el hospital (admisión programada o de urgencias). Las variables incluidas en nuestro estudio fueron las siguientes: edad, género, localización del tumor, estadio patológico, grado de diferenciación, quimioterapia previa a la cirugía y supervivencia. Resultados: los pacientes admitidos por primera vez al hospital a través del Servicio de Urgencias fueron diagnosticados con mayor frecuencia de cáncer de colon (63,7%) y con tumores pobremente diferenciados (64,2%) y metastásicos (70%). En el análisis de regresión de Cox la supervivencia libre de enfermedad produjo una razón de riesgo (RR) de 1,36 (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 1,11-1,66) para los pacientes del Servicio de Urgencias y para la supervivencia global de 1,41 (IC 95%: 1,14-1-76). Conclusiones: La admisión hospitalaria a través del Servicio de Urgencias es un indicador de agresividad y de peor pronóstico frente a los pacientes que ingresan por vía programada

Aims: the aim of this study was to examine the possible association between the type of hospital admission and subsequent survival of the patient, as well as the pathological features recorded in a large population of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: the study included 1,079 patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer in the Hospital Costa del Sol (Marbella, Spain). The relationship between patient survival rate and type of first admission to the hospital (elective or emergency admission) was assessed. The following variables were studied: age, gender, tumor location, pathological stage, differentiation grade, chemotherapy before surgery and survival. Results: colon tumors are more common in patients admitted to hospital for the first time via the emergency service (63.7%) and the tumors tend to be poorly differentiated (64.2%) and metastatic (70%). These patients also present a more aggressive disease and a poorer prognosis than patients with an elective admission. With regard to patients from the Emergency Department, a Cox regression analysis showed a risk-ratio (RR) of 1.36 (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.11-1.66) for disease-free survival and of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.14-1.76) for overall survival. Conclusions: hospital admission via the Emergency Department is an indicator of aggressiveness and poorer prognosis compared to patients who enter via programmed routes

First hospital contact via the Emergency Department is an independent predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

AIMS: the aim of this study was to examine the possible association between the type of hospital admission and subsequent survival of the patient, as well as the pathological features recorded in a large population of patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: the study included 1,079 patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer in the Hospital Costa del Sol (Marbella, Spain). The relationship between patient survival rate and type of first admission to the hospital (elective or emergency admission) was assessed. The following variables were studied: age, gender, tumor location, pathological stage, differentiation grade, chemotherapy before surgery and survival. RESULTS: colon tumors are more common in patients admitted to hospital for the first time via the emergency service (63.7%) and the tumors tend to be poorly differentiated (64.2%) and metastatic (70%). These patients also present a more aggressive disease and a poorer prognosis than patients with an elective admission. With regard to patients from the Emergency Department, a Cox regression analysis showed a risk-ratio (RR) of 1.36 (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.11-1.66) for disease-free survival and of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.14-1.76) for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: hospital admission via the Emergency Department is an indicator of aggressiveness and poorer prognosis compared to patients who enter via programmed routes.