Novel amide and imidazole compounds as potent hematopoietic prostaglandin D2 synthase inhibitors.

In seeking novel and potent small molecule hematopoietic prostaglandin D2 synthase (H-PGDS) inhibitors as potential therapies for PGD2-mediated diseases and conditions, we explored a series comprising multiple aryl/heteroaryl rings attached in a linear arrangement. Each compound incorporates an amide or imidazole "linker" between the pyrimidine or pyridine "core" ring and the "tail" ring system. We synthesized and screened twenty analogs by fluorescence polarization binding assay, thermal shift assay, glutathione S-transferase inhibition assay, and a cell-based assay measuring suppression of LPS-induced PGD2 stimulation. Amide analogs show ten-fold greater shift in the thermal shift assay in the presence of glutathione (GSH) versus the same assay run in the absence of GSH. The imidazole analogs did not produce a significant change in thermal shift between the two assay conditions, suggesting a possible stabilization effect of the amide linker in the synthase-GSH-inhibitor complex. Imidazole analog 23, (KMN-010034) demonstrates superior potency across the in vitro assays and good in vitro metabolic stability in both human and guinea pig liver microsomes.

Improved homology modeling of the human & rat EP4 prostanoid receptors.

BACKGROUND: The EP4 prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Novel selective EP4 receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor associated conditions. The rat EP4 (rEP4) receptor has been used as a surrogate for the human EP4 (hEP4) receptor in multiple SAR studies. To better understand the validity of this traditional approach, homology models were generated by threading for both receptors using the RaptorX server. These models were fit to an implicit membrane using the PPM server and OPM database with refinement of intra and extracellular loops by Prime (Schrödinger). To understand the interaction between the receptors and known agonists, induced-fit docking experiments were performed using Glide and Prime (Schrödinger), with both endogenous agonists and receptor sub-type selective, small-molecule agonists. The docking scores and observed interactions were compared with radioligand displacement experiments and receptor (rat & human) activation assays monitoring cAMP. RESULTS: Rank-ordering of in silico compound docking scores aligned well with in vitro activity assay EC50 and radioligand binding Ki. We observed variations between rat and human EP4 binding pockets that have implications in future small-molecule receptor-modulator design and SAR, specifically a S103G mutation within the rEP4 receptor. Additionally, these models helped identify key interactions between the EP4 receptor and ligands including PGE2 and several known sub-type selective agonists while serving as a marked improvement over the previously reported models. CONCLUSIONS: This work has generated a set of novel homology models of the rEP4 and hEP4 receptors. The homology models provide an improvement upon the previously reported model, largely due to improved solvation. The hEP4 docking scores correlates best with the cAMP activation data, where both data sets rank order Rivenprost>CAY10684 > PGE1 ≈ PGE2 > 11-deoxy-PGE1 ≈ 11-dexoy-PGE2 > 8-aza-11-deoxy-PGE1. This rank-ordering matches closely with the rEP4 receptor as well. Species-specific differences were noted for the weak agonists Sulprostone and Misoprostol, which appear to dock more readily within human receptor versus rat receptor.