ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated tolerogenic C-type lectin LSECtin loss in cirrhosis and its potential regulation by cytokines. METHODS: Liver tissue from patients with cirrhosis and healthy controls, immortalised and generated LSECtin-CRISPR immortalised LSECs, and murine primary LSECs from the CCl4 model were handled. RESULTS: LSECtin expression was reduced in liver tissue from cirrhotic patients, and it decreased from compensated to decompensated disease. Increased phosphorylation of MAPK, Akt and NFkB was observed upon LSECtin stimulation in LSEC murine cell line, showing a pattern of inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines either restrained (IL-10, CCL4) or unrestrained (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, CCL2). CD44 attenuated whereas LAG-3 increased all substrates phosphorylation in combination with TLR4 and TLR2 ligands except for NFkB. TNF-α, IL-1 ß, IL-6 and CCL2 were restrained by LSECtin crosslinking on TLRs studied. Conversely, IL-10 and CCL4 were upregulated, suggesting a LSECtin-TLRs synergistic effect. Also, LSECtin was significantly induced after IL-13 stimulation or combined with anti-inflammatory cytokines in cirrhotic and immortalised LSECs. Th17 and regulatory T cells were progressively increased in the hepatic tissue from compensated to decompensated patients. A significant inverse correlation was present between gene expression levels of CLEC4G/LSECtin and RORγT and FOXP3 in liver tissues. CONCLUSION: LSECtin restrains TLR proinflammatory secretome induced on LSECs by interfering immune response control, survival and MAPKs signalling pathways. The cytokine-dependent induction of LSECtin and the association between LSECtin loss and Th17 cell subset expansion in the liver, provides a solid background for exploring LSECtin retrieval as a mechanism to reprogram LSEC homeostatic function hampered during cirrhosis.
Subject(s)
Cytokines , Interleukin-10 , Humans , Mice , Animals , Cytokines/metabolism , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Secretome , Liver Cirrhosis , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Lectins, C-Type/genetics , Lectins, C-Type/metabolismABSTRACT
Mammalian puberty and Drosophila metamorphosis, despite their evolutionary distance, exhibit similar design principles and conservation of molecular components. In this Viewpoint, we review recent advances in this area and the similarities between both processes in terms of the signaling pathways and neuroendocrine circuits involved. We argue that the detection and uptake of peripheral fat by Drosophila prothoracic endocrine cells induces endomembrane remodeling and ribosomal maturation, leading to the acquisition of high biosynthetic and secretory capacity. The absence of this fat-neuroendocrine interorgan communication leads to giant, obese, non-pupating larvae. Importantly, human leptin is capable of signaling the pupariation process in Drosophila, and its expression prevents obesity and triggers maturation in mutants that do not pupate. This implies that insect metamorphosis can be used to address issues related to the biology of leptin and puberty.
Subject(s)
Leptin , Puberty , Animals , Humans , Leptin/genetics , Leptin/metabolism , Puberty/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Mammals/genetics , Mammals/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Obesity , Sexual MaturationABSTRACT
Mice are the most widely used animal model to study human diseases. However, the difficulty of in vivo recovery of mouse sperm has posed a limitation with its use in reproductive biology research. Several published techniques for obtaining sperm samples in vivo have been described, but most of them have several caveats. Critical limitations include poor reliability and significant mortality (Electroejaculation and drug-induced ejaculation), or the need for a large number of animals, careful programming, and laborious work (directed mating). Here, we describe a new approach for in vivo collection of sperm in the mouse via direct puncture of the epididymis to address these limitations. In addition, the technique is easy, safe, and reliable, allowing the animal to recover and maintain its fertility. In this way, punctual experiments could be carried out, or even more so, serial sampling of the same animal over time. Therefore, our approach allows for long-term and time-course experiments to study sperm characteristics under different treatments or conditions while maintaining the spermatogenic niche in vivo. In summary, we present our original approach as a powerful research tool to facilitate the study of spermatozoa relevant to various areas of biomedical research.
Subject(s)
Semen , Spermatozoa , Humans , Male , Animals , Mice , Reproducibility of Results , Testis , Epididymis , Sperm MotilityABSTRACT
Somatic energy reserves are essential for reproductive success and can govern the onset of sexual maturation. Here, we present a toolkit to analyze the metabolic status of Drosophila larvae using an optimized NMR profiling assay in dissected tissues or whole animals, as well as a complementary protocol for the dissection and staining of key organs in nutrient sensing. This toolkit will aid investigations into critical body weight signaling and how it is sensed for maturation commitment in Drosophila. For complete details on the use and execution of this profile, please refer to Juarez-Carreño et al. (2021).
Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster , Drosophila , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Larva/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Staining and LabelingABSTRACT
Fat stores are critical for reproductive success and may govern maturation initiation. Here, we report that signaling and sensing fat sufficiency for sexual maturation commitment requires the lipid carrier apolipophorin in fat cells and Sema1a in the neuroendocrine prothoracic gland (PG). Larvae lacking apolpp or Sema1a fail to initiate maturation despite accruing sufficient fat stores, and they continue gaining weight until death. Mechanistically, sensing peripheral body-fat levels via the apolipophorin/Sema1a axis regulates endocytosis, endoplasmic reticulum remodeling, and ribosomal maturation for the acquisition of the PG cells' high biosynthetic and secretory capacity. Downstream of apolipophorin/Sema1a, leptin-like upd2 triggers the cessation of feeding and initiates sexual maturation. Human Leptin in the insect PG substitutes for upd2, preventing obesity and triggering maturation downstream of Sema1a. These data show how peripheral fat levels regulate the control of the maturation decision-making process via remodeling of endomembranes and ribosomal biogenesis in gland cells.
Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Adiposity , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Endocrine Glands/metabolism , Ribosomes/metabolism , Sexual Maturation , Adipose Tissue/embryology , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Endocrine Glands/embryology , Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins/genetics , Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Glycoproteins/genetics , Glycoproteins/metabolism , Larva/genetics , Larva/metabolism , Lipogenesis , Protein Transport , Ribosomes/genetics , Semaphorins/genetics , Semaphorins/metabolism , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00533.].
ABSTRACT
The human brain is composed of billions of cells, including neurons and glia, with an undetermined number of subtypes. During the embryonic and early postnatal stages, the vast majority of these cells are generated from neural progenitors and stem cells located in all regions of the neural tube. A smaller number of neurons will continue to be generated throughout our lives, in localized neurogenic zones, mainly confined at least in rodents to the subependymal zone of the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. During neurogenesis, a combination of extrinsic cues interacting with temporal and regional intrinsic programs are thought to be critical for increasing neuronal diversity, but their underlying mechanisms need further elucidation. In this review, we discuss the recent findings in Drosophila and mammals on the types of cell division and cell interactions used by neural progenitors and stem cells to sustain neurogenesis, and how they are influenced by glia.
ABSTRACT
Drosophila melanogaster is an important model organism used to study the brain development of organisms ranging from insects to mammals. The central nervous system in fruit flies is formed primarily in two waves of neurogenesis, one of which occurs in the embryo and one of which occurs during larval stages. In order to understand neurogenesis, it is important to research the behavior of progenitor cells that give rise to the neural networks which make up the adult nervous system. This behavior has been shown to be influenced by different factors including interactions with other cells within the progenitor niche, or local tissue microenvironment. Glial cells form a crucial part of this niche and play an active role in the development of the brain. Although in the early years of neuroscience it was believed that glia were simply scaffolding for neurons and passive components of the nervous system, their importance is nowadays recognized. Recent discoveries in progenitors and niche cells have led to new understandings of how the developing brain shapes its diverse regions. In this review, we attempt to summarize the distinct neural progenitors and glia in the Drosophila melanogaster central nervous system, from embryo to late larval stages, and make note of homologous features in mammals. We also outline the recent advances in this field in order to define the impact that glial cells have on progenitor cell niches, and we finally emphasize the importance of communication between glia and progenitor cells for proper brain formation.
Subject(s)
Neural Stem Cells/physiology , Neurogenesis/physiology , Neuroglia/physiology , Stem Cell Niche/physiology , Animals , Brain/growth & development , Brain/physiology , Drosophila melanogasterABSTRACT
Symmetric growth and the origins of fluctuating asymmetry are unresolved phenomena of biology. Small, and sometimes noticeable, deviations from perfect bilateral symmetry reflect the vulnerability of development to perturbations. The degree of asymmetry is related to the magnitude of the perturbations and the ability of an individual to cope with them. As the left and right sides of an individual were presumed to be genetically identical, deviations of symmetry were traditionally attributed to non-genetic effects such as environmental and developmental noise. In this review, we draw attention to other possible sources of variability, especially to somatic mutations and transposons. Mutations are a major source of phenotypic variability and recent genomic data have highlighted somatic mutations as ubiquitous, even in phenotypically normal individuals. We discuss the importance of factors that are responsible for buffering and stabilizing the genome and for maintaining size robustness and quality through elimination of less-fit or damaged cells. However, the important question that arises from these studies is whether this self-correcting capacity and intrinsic organ size controls are sufficient to explain how symmetric structures can reach an identical size and shape. Indeed, recent discoveries in the fruit fly have uncovered a conserved hormone of the insulin/IGF/relaxin family, Dilp8, that is responsible for stabilizing body size and symmetry in the face of growth perturbations. Dilp8 alarm signals periphery growth status to the brain, where it acts on its receptor Lgr3. Loss of Dilp8-Lgr3 signaling renders flies incapable of detecting growth perturbations and thus maintaining a stable size and symmetry. These findings help to understand how size and symmetry of somatic tissues remain undeterred in noisy environments, after injury or illnesses, and in the presence of accumulated somatic mutations.
ABSTRACT
Body-size constancy and symmetry are signs of developmental stability. Yet, it is unclear exactly how developing animals buffer size variation. Drosophila insulin-like peptide Dilp8 is responsive to growth perturbations and controls homeostatic mechanisms that coordinately adjust growth and maturation to maintain size within the normal range. Here we show that Lgr3 is a Dilp8 receptor. Through the use of functional and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate assays, we defined a pair of Lgr3 neurons that mediate homeostatic regulation. These neurons have extensive axonal arborizations, and genetic and green fluorescent protein reconstitution across synaptic partners show that these neurons connect with the insulin-producing cells and prothoracicotropic hormone-producing neurons to attenuate growth and maturation. This previously unrecognized circuit suggests how growth and maturation rate are matched and co-regulated according to Dilp8 signals to stabilize organismal size.
Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Insulin/metabolism , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Receptors, Peptide/metabolism , Adenosine Monophosphate/metabolism , Animals , Body Size , Brain/cytology , Brain/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Homeostasis , Insect Hormones/genetics , Insect Hormones/metabolism , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Nerve Net/cytology , Nerve Net/metabolism , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Receptors, Peptide/genetics , Signal Transduction , Synapses/metabolismABSTRACT
Neuroepithelial cell proliferation must be carefully balanced with the transition to neuroblast (neural stem cell) to control neurogenesis. Here, we show that loss of the Drosophila microRNA mir-8 (the homolog of vertebrate miR-200 family) results in both excess proliferation and ectopic neuroblast transition. Unexpectedly, mir-8 is expressed in a subpopulation of optic-lobe-associated cortex glia that extend processes that ensheath the neuroepithelium, suggesting that glia cells communicate with the neuroepithelium. We provide evidence that miR-8-positive glia express Spitz, a transforming growth factor α (TGF-α)-like ligand that triggers epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation to promote neuroepithelial proliferation and neuroblast formation. Further, our experiments suggest that miR-8 ensures both a correct glial architecture and the spatiotemporal control of Spitz protein synthesis via direct binding to Spitz 3' UTR. Together, these results establish glial-derived cues as key regulatory elements in the control of neuroepithelial cell proliferation and the neuroblast transition.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Epidermal Growth Factor/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , MicroRNAs/genetics , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/growth & development , 3' Untranslated Regions , Animals , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Proliferation , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Enzyme Activation , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Neural Stem Cells , Neuroepithelial Cells/metabolism , Neurogenesis , Neuroglia/cytology , Neuroglia/metabolism , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/cytology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide/metabolism , Signal Transduction/geneticsABSTRACT
In the Drosophila optic lobes, the medulla processes visual information coming from inner photoreceptors R7 and R8 and from lamina neurons. It contains approximately 40,000 neurons belonging to more than 70 different types. Here we describe how precise temporal patterning of neural progenitors generates these different neural types. Five transcription factors-Homothorax, Eyeless, Sloppy paired, Dichaete and Tailless-are sequentially expressed in a temporal cascade in each of the medulla neuroblasts as they age. Loss of Eyeless, Sloppy paired or Dichaete blocks further progression of the temporal sequence. We provide evidence that this temporal sequence in neuroblasts, together with Notch-dependent binary fate choice, controls the diversification of the neuronal progeny. Although a temporal sequence of transcription factors had been identified in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts, our work illustrates the generality of this strategy, with different sequences of transcription factors being used in different contexts.
Subject(s)
Brain/cytology , Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Neurons/cytology , Neurons/metabolism , Animals , Brain/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/anatomy & histology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Male , Neural Stem Cells/metabolism , Time Factors , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Visual Pathways/cytologySubject(s)
Dissection/methods , Drosophila/embryology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/embryology , Staining and Labeling/methods , Animals , Drosophila/anatomy & histology , Larva/anatomy & histology , Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/anatomy & histology , Pupa/anatomy & histologyABSTRACT
In the developing Drosophila optic lobe, eyeless, apterous and distal-less, three genes that encode transcription factors with important functions during development, are expressed in broad subsets of medulla neurons. Medulla cortex cells follow two patterns of cell movements to acquire their final position: first, neurons are arranged in columns below each neuroblast. Then, during pupation, they migrate laterally, intermingling with each other to reach their retinotopic position in the adult optic lobe. eyeless, which encodes a Pax6 transcription factor, is expressed early in progenitors and controls aspects of this cell migration. Its loss in medulla neurons leads to overgrowth and a failure of lateral migration during pupation. These defects in cell migration among medulla cortex cells can be rescued by removing DE-Cadherin. Thus, eyeless links neurogenesis and neuronal migration.
Subject(s)
Cell Movement , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Paired Box Transcription Factors/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Cadherins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Eye Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Neurons/cytology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/cytology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/growth & development , PAX6 Transcription Factor , Paired Box Transcription Factors/genetics , Repressor Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Color vision requires comparison between photoreceptors that are sensitive to different wavelengths of light. In Drosophila, this is achieved by the inner photoreceptors (R7 and R8) that contain different rhodopsins. Two types of comparisons can occur in fly color vision: between the R7 (UV sensitive) and R8 (blue- or green sensitive) photoreceptor cells within one ommatidium (unit eye) or between different ommatidia that contain spectrally distinct inner photoreceptors. Photoreceptors project to the optic lobes: R1-R6, which are involved in motion detection, project to the lamina, whereas R7 and R8 reach deeper in the medulla. This paper analyzes the neural network underlying color vision into the medulla. RESULTS: We reconstruct the neural network in the medulla, focusing on neurons likely to be involved in processing color vision. We identify the full complement of neurons in the medulla, including second-order neurons that contact both R7 and R8 from a single ommatidium, or contact R7 and/or R8 from different ommatidia. We also examine third-order neurons and local neurons that likely modulate information from second-order neurons. Finally, we present highly specific tools that will allow us to functionally manipulate the network and test both activity and behavior. CONCLUSIONS: This precise characterization of the medulla circuitry will allow us to understand how color vision is processed in the optic lobe of Drosophila, providing a paradigm for more complex systems in vertebrates.
Subject(s)
Color Perception/physiology , Drosophila/cytology , Neurons/cytology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/cytology , Animals , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/physiology , Neurons/metabolism , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolismABSTRACT
In the eye, visual information is segregated into modalities such as color and motion, these being transferred to the central brain through separate channels. Here, we genetically dissect the achromatic motion channel in the fly Drosophila melanogaster at the level of the first relay station in the brain, the lamina, where it is split into four parallel pathways (L1-L3, amc/T1). The functional relevance of this divergence is little understood. We now show that the two most prominent pathways, L1 and L2, together are necessary and largely sufficient for motion-dependent behavior. At high pattern contrast, the two pathways are redundant. At intermediate contrast, they mediate motion stimuli of opposite polarity, L2 front-to-back, L1 back-to-front motion. At low contrast, L1 and L2 depend upon each other for motion processing. Of the two minor pathways, amc/T1 specifically enhances the L1 pathway at intermediate contrast. L3 appears not to contribute to motion but to orientation behavior.
Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/physiology , Color Perception/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Nervous System , Visual Pathways/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Flight, Animal/physiology , Interneurons/classification , Interneurons/physiology , Motion , Nervous System/cytology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Signal Transduction/physiologyABSTRACT
One of the most fascinating topics in biology is to understand the development of highly differentiated cells such as photoreceptors (PRs). This process involves successive steps, starting with the generation of the eye primordium, recruitment and specification of PRs and finally, expression of the proper rhodopsin, the photopigment that initiates the signaling cascade underlying light input excitation. In this review, we describe the sequential steps that take place in the Drosophila eye, from the initial neuronal specification of PRs through their full maturation, focusing specifically on the transcription factors and signaling pathways involved in controlling the precise expression of different rhodopsins in specialized PRs.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Photoreceptor Cells/metabolism , Animals , Body Patterning/genetics , Body Patterning/physiology , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Models, Genetic , Photoreceptor Cells/cytology , Photoreceptor Cells/growth & development , Retina/cytology , Retina/growth & development , Retina/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Perlecan is a proteoglycan expressed in the basal lamina of the neuroepithelium during development. Perlecan absence does not impair basal lamina assembly, although in the 55% of the mutants early disruptions of this lamina conducts to exencephaly, impairing brain development. The rest of perlecan-null brains complete its prenatal development, maintain basal lamina continuity interrupted by some isolated ectopias, and are microcephalic. Microcephaly consists of thinner cerebral walls and underdeveloped ganglionic eminences. We have studied the mechanisms that generate brain atrophy in telencephalic areas where basal lamina is intact. RESULTS: Brain atrophy in the absence of perlecan started in the ventral forebrain and extended to lateral and dorsal parts of the cortex in the following stages. First, the subpallial forebrain developed poorly in early perlecan-null embryos, because of a reduced cell proliferation: the number of cells in mitosis decreased since the early stages of development. This reduction resulted in a decreased tangential migration of interneurons to the cerebral cortex. Concomitant with the early hypoplasia observed in the medial ganglionic eminences, Sonic Hedgehog signal decreased in the perlecan-null floor plate basal lamina at E12.5. Second, neurogenesis in the pallial neuroepithelium was affected in perlecan deficient embryos. We found reductions of nearly 50% in the number of cells exiting the cell cycle at E12-E13. The labeling index, which was normal at this age, significantly decreased with advancing corticogenesis. Moreover, nestin+ or PCNA+ progenitors increased since E14.5, reaching up to about 150% of the proportion of PCNA+ cells in the wild-type at E17.5. Thus, labeling index reduction together with increased progenitor population, suggests that atrophy is the result of altered cell cycle progression in the cortical progenitors. Accordingly, less neurons populated the cortical plate and subplate of perlecan-null neocortex, as seen with the neuronal markers beta-tubulin and Tbr1. CONCLUSION: As a component of the basal lamina, perlecan both maintains this structure and controls the response of the neuroepithelium to growth factors. Less mitotic cells in the early medial ganglionic eminences, and impaired cell cycle progression in the late neocortex, suggests insufficient recruitment and signaling by neurogenic morphogens, such as SHH or FGF2.
Subject(s)
Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans/genetics , Organogenesis , Telencephalon/embryology , Animals , Apoptosis , Basement Membrane/cytology , Basement Membrane/embryology , Basement Membrane/metabolism , Cell Count , Cell Proliferation , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Female , Fetal Organ Maturity , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/genetics , Hedgehog Proteins/genetics , Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans/deficiency , Immunohistochemistry , Interneurons/cytology , Interneurons/metabolism , Male , Mice , Microcephaly/genetics , Neocortex/cytology , Neocortex/embryology , Neocortex/metabolism , Neurons/cytology , Neurons/metabolism , Pregnancy , Telencephalon/cytology , Telencephalon/metabolismABSTRACT
The sensory tasks performed by the eye are diverse and complex. In Drosophila, the eye performs motion detection for navigation as well as detection of the quality of light (color and polarized light). Both types of inputs are processed separately, as different photoreceptors are specialized in these tasks and contact different target cell layers in the optic lobe. However, their respective outputs are likely to be integrated in higher brain centers. Here, we discuss the cell diversity and potential role of the several ganglia that form the fly optic lobe. We also discuss the power of modern genetic tools to provide the potential to trace the visual neural networks.