Contrast-induced encephalopathy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: What the nephrologist needs to know.

Contrast-induced encephalopathy is a neurological complication related to contrast used in endovascular procedures or computed tomography (CT). The main risk factors are arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperosmolar contrasts, the amount of infused contrast and its direct infusion in the posterior cerebral territory, or pathologies with blood-brain barrier damage. Symptomatology is non-specific and may present as altered level of consciousness, neurological focality or seizures. Diagnosis is done by exclusion after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke has been ruled out; CT or MRI are useful for differentiation. Generally, it appears shortly after exposure and the symptoms lasts 48-72h with complete recovery, although cases with persistence of symptoms or longer duration have been described. Treatment consists of monitoring, supportive measures and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with hemodialysis (HD) in patients in chronic KRT program. It is important for the nephrologist to be aware of this entity given the susceptibility of the patient on HD as well as its potential therapeutic role in these patients.

Factor B Inhibition with Iptacopan in Recurrent C3 Glomerulopathy Following Kidney Transplant: A Report of Two Cases.

C3 glomerulopathy is a rare disease caused by fluid phase dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. Currently, treatment depends on clinical and histological severity and includes nephroprotection, unspecific immunosuppression, and terminal complement blockers (C5), without having an etiological treatment approved. C3 glomerulopathy has high recurrence rates after kidney transplantation with a high risk of graft loss. Fortunately, new molecules are being developed that specifically target the proximal alternative complement pathway, such as iptacopan, a factor B inhibitor that showed promising results in native kidneys and cases of transplant recurrence in a phase 2 clinical trial. We present 2 "real-world" cases of C3 glomerulopathy recurrence in kidney allografts treated with iptacopan, with initial excellent clinical response and safety profile, especially with early introduction. We also present follow-up biopsies that showed no C3 deposition during factor B inhibition. Our cases suggest that proximal blockade of the alternative complement pathway can be effective and safe in the treatment of C3 glomerulopathy recurrence in kidney transplantation, bringing other questions such as dual blockade (eg, in C3 and C5), the optimal patient profile to benefit from factor B inhibition or treatment duration and its potential use in other forms of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (eg, immune complex-mediated).

Long-Term Outcomes of Incidental Liver Malignancies in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The pretransplant diagnosis of liver malignancies in nodular cirrhotic livers remains a diagnostic challenge despite current advances. Although the prognostic impact of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) in liver transplant recipients is well documented, there are no data on the impact in simultaneous liver kidney transplant (LKT) recipients. METHODS: This is a single-center observational, retrospective study of all LKT performed from May 1993 to April 2022. Among these patients, demographic data, immunosuppressive therapy, rejection episodes, and prevalence of incidental HCC or iCC were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred eight LKTs were performed and 6 were excluded. There were 13 patients with incidental carcinomas in the explanted liver: one of them with both an HCC and iCC, one with an iCC, and the remaining with an HCC. One case of iCC died. No other recurrences occurred. There were no cases of incidental HCC nor iCC in patients with a hereditary or metabolic LKT indication. We found no differences in the 5-year patient survival, and death-censored kidney and liver graft survival rates for those LKT with an incidental HCC and those without it (76.9% vs 84.2%, P = .5; 100% vs 91.6%, P = .28; and 100% vs 94.7%, P = 0.39, respectively). Finally, there were no significant associations between explant carcinoma and rejections of the liver (7.7% vs 17.9%, P = .34) or kidney graft (0% vs 16.8%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Despite a high prevalence of incidental HCC or iCC, patient, kidney, and liver graft 5-year survival were unaffected by incidental HCC.

Results of Salt Intake Restriction Monitored with the New Sodium Control Biosensor.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to a low-sodium (Na) diet is crucial in patients under hemodialysis, as it improves cardiovascular outcomes and reduces thirst and interdialytic weight gain. Recommended salt intake is lower than 5 g/day. The new 6008 CAREsystem monitors incorporate a Na module that offers the advantage of estimating patients' salt intake. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary Na restriction for 1 week, monitored with the Na biosensor. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 48 patients who maintained their usual dialysis parameters and were dialyzed with a 6008 CAREsystem monitor with activation of the Na module. Total Na balance, pre-/post-dialysis weight, serum Na (sNa), changes in pre- to post-dialysis sNa (ΔsNa), diffusive balance, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were compared twice, once after 1 week of patients' usual Na diet and again after another week with more restricted Na intake. RESULTS: Restricted Na intake increased the percentage of patients on a low-Na diet (<85 Na mmol/day) from 8% to 44%. Average daily Na intake decreased from 149 ± 54 to 95 ± 49 mmol, and interdialytic weight gain was reduced by 460 ± 484 g per session. More restricted Na intake also decreased pre-dialysis sNa and increased both intradialytic diffusive balance and ΔsNa. In hypertensive patients, reducing daily Na by more than 3 g Na/day lowered their systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The new Na module allowed objective monitoring of Na intake, which in turn could permit more precise personalized dietary recommendations in patients under hemodialysis.