The Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has been reported to affect 1 in 10 000 pregnant women. There is limited evidence available regarding the optimal management of LDH in pregnant patients. We aimed to review the current evidence for the management of symptomatic LDH in pregnancy through critical appraisal and analysis of the available literature. METHODS: Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and The Cochrane Library from inception using predetermined search terms. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant women with symptomatic LDH were included. The quality of eligible articles was assessed and extracted data and characteristics were pooled for analysis. References cited by studies were screened to identify other relevant publications. RESULTS: Thirty studies involving 52 patients were identified. Compared to surgically managed patients, conservatively managed patients had a higher full recovery rate (61.54% vs 56.41%) and reported a lower rate of persistent symptoms (30.77% vs 38.54%). Compared to patients who were treated surgically for cauda equina syndrome, patients treated surgically for sciatica had a higher full recovery rate (80.95% vs 27.78%) and reported a lower rate of persistent symptoms (14.29% vs 66.67%). CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence to guide the management of pregnant patients with LDH. Despite a suggestion toward improved outcomes with conservative management, the presence of selection bias and the overall poor quality of current research precludes reliable conclusions from being drawn. Decision making for this patient group should be undertaken within a multidisciplinary setting.

Management of Catastrophic Proximal Junctional Failure Following Spinal Deformity Correction in an Adult with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Case Report and Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a major and sometimes devastating problem following adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction surgery. Common consensus still lags on guidelines for preventing and managing these complications. Surgical treatment of scoliosis in the presence of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) in the pediatric population is well described. The complication rates are unusually higher in this special subset of patients owing to poor quality of bone. There is a paucity of literature focusing on surgical techniques, strategies, and problems involved in the management of ASD associated with OI. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a 59-year-old female with type 1 OI and adult scoliosis who underwent T10-to-pelvis fusion for ASD according to the principles of adult deformity correction. At a 1-year follow-up, she presented with asymptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis of 45° and 2 weeks later had PJF along with spinal cord injury after a fall. On computed tomography scan, kyphosis was increased to 60° at T9-T10. She underwent decompression and revision deformity correction using quadruple rods, with extension of instrumentation to T2 with soft landing using rib bands. At a 4-year follow-up, she had a good functional outcome after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of successful management of PJF following ASD correction in the presence of OI using this technique. Suboptimal hold of implants due to poor bone quality must be at the focus of any surgical planning for these patients. All possible strategies to prevent PJF must be considered when planning the deformity correction in adults with OI.

Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis: the Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSDS).

PURPOSE: Spondylodiscitis represents a condition with significant heterogeneity. A significant proportion of patients are managed without surgical intervention, but there remains a group where surgery is mandated. The aim of our study was to create a scoring system to guide clinicians as to which patients with spondylodiscitis may require surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients presenting to our institution with a diagnosis of spondylodiscitis between 2005 and 2014 was performed. Data for 35 variables, characterised as potential risk factors for requiring surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis, were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictability of each. A prediction model was constructed, and the model was externally validated using a second series of patients from 2014 to 2015 meeting the same standards as the first population. The predicted odds were calculated for every patient in the data set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created, and the area under curve (AUC) was determined. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified. Surgery was deemed necessary in 21 patients. Six predictors: distant site infection, medical comorbidities, the immunocompromised patient, MRI findings, anatomical location and neurology, were found to be the most consistent risk factors for surgical intervention. An internally validated scoring system with an AUC of 0.83 and an Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 115.2 was developed. External validation using a further 20 patients showed an AUC of 0.71 at 95% confidence interval of 0.50-0.88. CONCLUSIONS: A new scoring system has been developed which can help guide clinicians as to when surgical intervention may be required. Further prospective analyses are required to validate this proposed scoring system. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.