ABSTRACT
En las últimas décadas ha venido produciéndose un cambio de paradigma en la relación médico-enfermo, que ha pasado de una visión paternalista a una medicina más centrada en el paciente. La toma de decisiones compartidas (TDC) es un proceso que incluye el intercambio de información (personal y médica) entre el paciente y el sanitario respecto a la enfermedad, la deliberación sobre las distintas opciones y, finalmente, la toma de una decisión consensuada. Para facilitar este proceso se han desarrollado distintas herramientas mediante diversos medios y formatos (folletos, texto escrito, vídeos, aplicaciones informáticas...), utilizando en muchas ocasiones ayudas visuales tales como caras sonrientes u otros pictogramas. Desde nuestro grupo de trabajo nos unimos a este proceso evolutivo de la práctica médica y presentamos una herramienta de ayuda visual a la TDC en el caso de pacientes con estenosis carotídea asintomática mayor del 70%. Para su realización nos hemos basado en los cates plots, que ayudan a cuantificar riesgos y beneficios de una intervención de forma estandarizada
In the last decades there has been a paradigm change in the doctor-patient relationship, from a paternalistic model to a patient centered medicine. Shared decision making (SDM) is a process that involves bidirectional communication between physicians and patients about the illness, different treatment options, and, through the deliberation process, reaching an agreement in the ultimate decision made. Various different tools have been developed to promote shared decision making, through different types of support methods (leaflets, books, videos, websites or other interactive media), frequently using visual aids like smiley faces plots or other pictograms. Our Working Group would like to join this evolutionary process. Thus, we have developed a visual aid tool to help in the decision-making process in the case of asymptomatic carotid stenosis > 70%. We have based on Cates plots that help to quantify risks and benefits of specific interventions in a standardized manner
Subject(s)
Humans , Decision Making , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Physician-Patient Relations , Asymptomatic Diseases , Endarterectomy, CarotidABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Duplex ultrasound (DUS) arterial mapping of the aortoiliac area is limited by obesity, abdominal gas, and the need to use a low-frequency probe (and therefore poorer resolution) in the examination. The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of agreement between DUS mapping of the aortoiliac area and angiography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Between November 2006 and June 2015, there were 173 patients with a surgical indication for aortoiliac occlusive disease included, with preoperative aortoiliac DUS mapping and subsequent CTA or intraoperative angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DUS as an arterial mapping test were analyzed, as was the degree of agreement with angiography/CTA and agreement between the surgical indication based on DUS and the final surgical technique performed. RESULTS: Of 173 DUS mapping tests, 155 were evaluated (89.6%); the remaining 18 were not able to be evaluated because of the patient's obesity or bowel gas. Overall accuracy of DUS for predicting significant artery lesions was as follows: 92% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-95%), 96% specificity (95% CI, 95%-97%), 89% positive predictive value (95% CI, 86%-93%), and 97% negative predictive value (95% CI, 96%-98%). Agreement with angiography/CTA had a κ index of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), which reflects a good degree of agreement. Surgical indications based on DUS mapping were correct in 89% of cases (138/155). CONCLUSIONS: DUS mapping of the aortoiliac territory could be used as a single preoperative imaging test in aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients whose DUS examination is able to be evaluated.
