Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare different methods to treat hydrosalpinx, based on both ablative and non-ablative approaches, in infertile patients before undergoing IVF-ET. METHODS: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of comparisons between different treatments of hydrosalpinx in infertile patients undergoing IVF. DATA SOURCES: structured searches in common citation databases. Study inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed randomized trials (RCT) or cohort studies comparing effects of salpingectomy, laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion (LTO), insertion of intratubal device (ITD), sclerotherapy, ultrasound-guided aspiration and no treatment, on live birth, ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy as main outcomes, considering also miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and complications as secondary outcomes. Principal NMA included RCT, and aggregated NMA of RCT and observational studies was carried out. Pooled effects have been estimated by Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for direct and indirect-mixed comparisons, derived from random-effects models. Imprecision and heterogeneity of NMA estimations was assessed by comparison of its 95% CI with predefined intervals for clinically relevant size of effect (OR <0.9 or >1.1). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to predict treatment rankings for each outcome. RESULTS: Nine RCT were included in main analysis, plus 17 additional observational studies in additional analysis. NMA of RCT did not identify significant differences in the effect of compared treatments on live birth rate, and LTO was the option with the highest value of SUCRA (0.92, mean rank: 1.2). Salpingectomy and US-aspiration associated to a significant increase of ongoing pregnancy rate compared to no treatment, according to NMA results (NMA OR: 4.35; 95% CI: 1.7, 11.14 and 2.8; 95% CI: 1.03, 7.58 respectively). Salpingectomy had the highest SUCRA value (0.88, mean rank: 1.4). NMA estimated significant increase of clinical pregnancy rate for salpingectomy compared with no treatment (NMA OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.3, 3.86) as well as for LTO versus no treatment (NMA OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.2, 5.41). Both comparisons were affected by a high grade of heterogeneity. For clinical pregnancy, LTO was the intervention with highest SUCRA (0.85; mean rank: 1.6). Regarding secondary outcomes, feasible NMA estimates did not support significant differences between treatments effects. According to aggregated NMA including randomized and observational studies, sclerotherapy showed significant beneficial effects on live birth rate compared to no treatment (NMA (OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.21, 17.46). Compared with untreated patients, the aggregated NMA estimates a higher ongoing pregnancy rate in patients treated with salpingectomy (NMA OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.12, 5.12), US-aspiration (NMA OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.65) and LTO (NMA OR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.11, 5.43). Salpingectomy and LTO produced a higher beneficial effect compared to ITD, based on both direct and indirect comparisons. Salpingectomy obtained the highest SUCRA value in rank of effects on ongoing pregnancy (0.94; mean rank: 1.2). NMA found significant effects on clinical pregnancy for comparisons between the different active management procedures compared with no treatments, with the exception of ITD insertion. LTO had more increasing effect on clinical pregnancy rate compared with US-aspiration (NMA OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.97), while for the rest of the comparisons between procedures no significant differences were identified. NMA ranked LTO as the treatment with a highest SUCRA value (0.91; mean rank: 1.5). NMA prediction models identified LTO as best intervention to reduce miscarriage (SUCRA value: 0.84; mean rank: 1.8), as sclerotherapy as safer option in terms of ovarian response to IVF stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The present NMA fails to support the effectiveness of any option to treat hydrosalpinx before IVF in order to improve live birth rates, although the beneficial effect of salpingectomy and US aspirations on ongoing pregnancy rates and of both salpingectomy and LTO on clinical pregnancy rates emerges from our analysis, which reinforces current recommendations. Based on the aggregated analyses, sclerotherapy could be a promising alternative to conventional laparoscopic techniques, combined with a favorable safety profile. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

2.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn ; 16(1): 9-22, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551471

ABSTRACT

Background: Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) can be associated with impairments of early and late pregnancy events. Objective: To assess the impact of CUA on reproductive outcomes in pregnancies conceived spontaneously or after assisted reproduction. Materials and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing patients with CUA versus women with normal uterus. A structured literature search was performed in leading scientific databases to identify prospective and retrospective studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale, adapted to AHRQ standards, was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Publication bias and statistical heterogeneity were assessed, and meta-regression was used to analyse the heterogeneity. Main outcome measures: Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, term, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), malpresentation at delivery, preterm delivery prior to 37, 34 and 32 weeks, caesarean delivery, intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age, foetal mortality and perinatal mortality. Results: 32 studies were included. CUAs increased significantly the risk of first/second trimester miscarriage (OR:1.54;95%CI:1.14-2.07), placental abruption (OR:5.04;3.60-7.04), PROM (OR:1.71;1.34-2.18), foetal malpresentation at delivery (OR:21.04;10.95-40.44), preterm birth (adjusted OR:4.34;3.59-5.21), a caesarean delivery (adjusted OR:7.69;4.17-14.29), intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age (adjusted OR:50;6.11-424), foetal mortality (OR:2.07;1.56-2.73) and perinatal mortality (OR:3.28;2.01-5.36). Conclusions: CUA increases the risk of complications during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Complications most frequent in CUA patients were preterm delivery, foetal malpresentation, and caesarean delivery. What is new?: Bicornuate uterus was associated with the highest number of adverse outcomes, followed by didelphys, subseptate and septate uterus.

3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 27(12): 1401-1403, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815639

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Spondylodiscitis secondary to colposacropexy is an extremely rare entity. Infection and mesh rejection are the main causes. Removal of the mesh is essential for patient's recovery and it can be a very challenging surgical procedure. CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented with severe low back pain in the context of a recent colposacropexy. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed and spondylodiscitis secondary to prolapse correction surgery with mesh was suspected. In order to ensure an adequate recovery, removal of the mesh was required. CONCLUSIONS: Spondylodiscitis secondary to colposacropexy should be suspected when the patient starts with moderate lumbar pain and is not correctly controlled with first-level analgesia. Infection or mesh rejection should be considered. Mesh rejection should be suspected when the patient does not improve after antibiotics. Complete removal of the mesh is needed in order to ensure the patient's recovery.


Subject(s)
Discitis , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Aged , Female , Humans , Discitis/etiology , Discitis/surgery , Graft Rejection , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects
4.
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.) ; 50(3): [100853], Jul-Sep. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-223316

ABSTRACT

Dentro de la patología intracavitaria estructural, los miomas submucosos plantean una mayor dificultad de manejo frente a los pólipos. Dentro de los miomas submucosos los miomas tipo0 y1 son más fáciles de tratar, dado que su separación del miometrio subyacente es técnicamente más fácil. Así, las cirugías histeroscópicas más complicadas son actualmente las miomectomías de miomas submucosos tipo2.Se ha empezado a describir también el manejo histeroscópico de miomas tipo3 por histeroscopia.Con este artículo planteamos hacer una revisión de los puntos más relevantes para llevar a cabo un tratamiento adecuado de este tipo de miomas, revisando su diagnóstico, las técnicas quirúrgicas, la preparación de la paciente y la forma de evitar complicaciones quirúrgicas.(AU)


Within structural intracavitary pathology, submucosal myomas are more difficult to manage than polyps. Of the submucosal myomas, type0 and type1 are easier to treat because their separation from the underlying myometrium is technically easier. Therefore, the most complicated hysteroscopic surgeries are currently type2 submucosal myomectomies.We have also begun to describe the hysteroscopic management of type3 myomas.With this article we propose to make a review of the most relevant points for the correct treatment of this type of myoma, reviewing its diagnosis, surgical techniques, patient preparation, and how to avoid surgical complications.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Myoma , Hysteroscopy/instrumentation , Hysteroscopy/methods , Hysteroscopy/trends , Lasers , Vasopressins , Uterine Diseases , Gynecology
5.
Cienc. ginecol ; 10(2): 105-116, mar.-abr. 2006.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-045030

ABSTRACT

Aproximadamente un 20% de mujeres en edad fértil pueden presentar menorragia. Los tratamientos médicos están indicados en mujeres que no desean cirugía. La cirugía tradicional es la histerectomía; sin embargo, estamos viendo como técnicas menos agresivas pueden ser preferibles. El sistema intrauterino de liberación de levonorgestrel puede ser el tratamiento indicado en mujeres jóvenes que prefieren conservar su capacidad reproductiva. La ablación endometrial transhisteroscópica, es un procedimiento quirúrgico que está indicado para el tratamiento de las hemorragias uterinas disfuncionales, cuando estas no responden al tratamiento médico. La primera generación de técnicas de ablación endometrial incluye: la resección transcervical del endometrio y la ablación con láser Nd- YAG; constituyendo actualmente el patrón de oro de los tratamientos histeroscópicos de la menorragia. La segunda generación incluye: balones térmicos, radiofrecuencia, microondas, crioablación endometrial, ablación endometrial fotodinámica. Estos métodos intentan ser más sencillos y con menor riesgo que la electrocirugía o la ablación con láser. En el presente trabajo se revisan los pormenores metodológicos, así como las indicaciones, contraindicaciones y resultados. La ablación endometrial más que reemplazar a la histerectomía, parece haber añadido una alternativa a la técnica quirúrgica


Menorrhagia affects about 20 percent of the women of reproductive age. Medical therapy is indicated for patient who do not wish surgery. Hysterectomy is the traditional operation, but, it has been suggested that less invasive techniques could be preferable. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system may be the treatment in younger women who would prefer to preserve their reproductive potential. The hysteroscopic endometrial ablation is a chirurgical proceeding, which is used in the abnormal uterine bleeding treatment when they don’t respond to the hormonal treatment. The first generation of histeroscopic ablation techniques include: transcervical resection of the endometrium and Nd-YAG laser ablation; and are nowadays the gold standard for the hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia. The second generation include: thermal balloon ablation, radiofrequency, microwave, endometrial cryoablation, photodynamic endometrial ablation method. These methods are intended to be much simpler to perform with less risk than electrosurgical o laser endometrial ablation. In this article are reviewed the methodology, besides the indications, contraindications and results of this proceeding. Rather than replacing hysterectomy1, endometrial ablation appears to have added an alternative operative technique


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Uterine Hemorrhage/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Hysteroscopy/methods
6.
Cienc. ginecol ; 4(6): 271-275, nov. 2000. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-11451

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar si la técnica láser es adecuada en cirugía laparoscópica. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 104 intervenciones realizadas entre, 1997 y 1999. Las indicaciones fueron: endometriosis, formación anexial, mioma uterino, dolor pélvico crónico y síndrome de ovario poliquístico. Analizamos la técnica quirúrgica y las complicaciones. Resultados: El láser tiene una gran capacidad de vaporización de los tejidos; sin embargo, la hemostasia puede ser deficiente. En un 25 por ciento de casos fue necesario coagulación bipolar. Conclusiones: La técnica láser es un complemento a la cirugía convencional y está espacialmente indicada en la endometriosis (AU)


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Endometriosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...