Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Psychiatry ; 7(12): 1275, 2017 12 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29225337

ABSTRACT

Clinical evidence supports the use of second-generation dopamine D2 receptor antagonists (D2RAs) as adjunctive therapy or in some cases monotherapy in patients with depression. However, the mechanism for the clinical antidepressant effect of D2RAs remains unclear. Specifically, given accumulating evidence for decreased ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine system function in depression, an antidepressant effect of a medication that is expected to further reduce dopamine system activity seems paradoxical. In the present paper we used electrophysiological single unit recordings of identified VTA dopamine neurons to characterize the impact of acute and repeated administration of the D2RA quetiapine at antidepressant doses in non-stressed rats and those exposed to the chronic mild stress (CMS) rodent depression model, the latter modeling the hypodopaminergic state observed in patients with depression. We found that acute quetiapine increased dopamine neuron population activity in non-stressed rats, but not in CMS-exposed rats. Conversely, repeated quetiapine increased VTA dopamine neuron population activity to normal levels in CMS-exposed rats, but had no persisting effects in non-stressed rats. These data suggest that D2RAs may exert their antidepressant actions via differential effects on the dopamine system in a normal vs. hypoactive state. This explanation is supported by prior studies showing that D2RAs differentially impact the dopamine system in animal models of schizophrenia and normal rats; the present results extend this phenomenon to an animal model of depression. These data highlight the importance of studying medications in the context of animal models of psychiatric disorders as well as normal conditions.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Depression/prevention & control , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Dopaminergic Neurons/drug effects , Quetiapine Fumarate/administration & dosage , Stress, Psychological , Ventral Tegmental Area/drug effects , Animals , Dopaminergic Neurons/physiology , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Ventral Tegmental Area/physiology
2.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 42(4): 904-913, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27813530

ABSTRACT

Emerging evidence supports a role for dopamine in major depressive disorder (MDD). We recently reported fewer spontaneously active ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons (ie, reduced dopamine neuron population activity) in the chronic mild stress (CMS) rodent model of MDD. In this study, we examined the role of two brain regions that have been implicated in MDD in humans, the infralimbic prefrontal cortex (ILPFC)-that is, rodent homolog of Brodmann area 25 (BA25), and the lateral habenula (LHb) in the CMS-induced attenuation of dopamine neuron activity. The impact of activating the ILPFC or LHb was evaluated using single-unit extracellular recordings of identified VTA dopamine neurons. The involvement of each region in dopamine neuron attenuation following 5-7 weeks of CMS was then evaluated by selective inactivation. Activation of either ILPFC or LHb in normal rats potently suppressed dopamine neuron population activity, but in unique patterns. ILPFC activation selectively inhibited dopamine neurons in medial VTA, which were most impacted by CMS. Conversely, LHb activation selectively inhibited dopamine neurons in lateral VTA, which were unaffected by CMS. Moreover, only ILPFC inactivation restored dopamine neuron population activity to normal levels following CMS; LHb inactivation had no restorative effect. These data suggest that, in the CMS model of MDD, the ILPFC is the primary driver of diminished dopamine neuron responses. These findings support a neural substrate for ILPFC/BA25 linking affective and motivational circuitry dysfunction in MDD.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Dopamine/metabolism , Dopaminergic Neurons/physiology , Habenula/physiopathology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Ventral Tegmental Area/physiopathology , Animals , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Dopaminergic Neurons/metabolism , Habenula/metabolism , Male , Prefrontal Cortex/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Stress, Psychological/metabolism , Ventral Tegmental Area/metabolism
3.
Depress Anxiety ; 31(8): 690-8, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24753183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a pervasive and difficult to treat condition for which deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate white matter (SCCwm) is an emerging therapeutic option. However, neuropsychological safety data for this novel treatment have only been published for a small number of subjects. Moreover, little is known regarding the neuropsychological profile present in TRD patients at baseline, prior to initiation of DBS therapy. This report describes the neuropsychological effects of TRD and acute and chronic DBS of the SCCwm in patients with unipolar and bipolar TRD. METHODS: Patients with TRD (N = 17) were compared to a healthy control group (N = 15) on subtests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery and the Stroop Task. Patients were then tested again at subsequent time points of 1 and 6 months following the initiation of chronic DBS of the SCCwm. RESULTS: Patients with TRD showed similar levels of performance to healthy controls on most neuropsychological measures, with the exception that the TRD group had slower processing speed. Patients with bipolar TRD, relative to those with unipolar TRD, obtained lower scores on measures of executive function and memory only at baseline. With acute and chronic SCCwm DBS, neuropsychological function improved in multiple domains including processing speed and executive function (planning, set shifting, response inhibition), and memory remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TRD show slowed processing speed but otherwise largely preserved neuropsychological functioning. DBS of the SCCwm does not result in worsening of any aspect of neuropsychological function and may improve certain domains. Future research is warranted to better understand the effects of TRD and DBS on neuropsychological function.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Executive Function/physiology , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Adult , Corpus Callosum/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
4.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 69(2): 150-8, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22213770

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be an effective intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but available data are limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of subcallosal cingulate DBS in patients with TRD with either major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar II disorder (BP). DESIGN: Open-label trial with a sham lead-in phase. SETTING: Academic medical center. Patients  Men and women aged 18 to 70 years with a moderate-to-severe major depressive episode after at least 4 adequate antidepressant treatments. Ten patients with MDD and 7 with BP were enrolled from a total of 323 patients screened. Intervention  Deep brain stimulation electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the subcallosal cingulate white matter. Patients received single-blind sham stimulation for 4 weeks followed by active stimulation for 24 weeks. Patients then entered a single-blind discontinuation phase; this phase was stopped after the first 3 patients because of ethical concerns. Patients were evaluated for up to 2 years after the onset of active stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in depression severity and functioning over time, and response and remission rates after 24 weeks were the primary efficacy end points; secondary efficacy end points were 1 year and 2 years of active stimulation. RESULTS: A significant decrease in depression and increase in function were associated with chronic stimulation. Remission and response were seen in 3 patients (18%) and 7 (41%) after 24 weeks (n = 17), 5 (36%) and 5 (36%) after 1 year (n = 14), and 7 (58%) and 11 (92%) after 2 years (n = 12) of active stimulation. No patient achieving remission experienced a spontaneous relapse. Efficacy was similar for patients with MDD and those with BP. Chronic DBS was safe and well tolerated, and no hypomanic or manic episodes occurred. A modest sham stimulation effect was found, likely due to a decrease in depression after the surgical intervention but prior to entering the sham phase. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the long-term safety and antidepressant efficacy of subcallosal cingulate DBS for TRD and suggest equivalent safety and efficacy for TRD in patients with BP. Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00367003.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Gyrus Cinguli , Adult , Female , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Single-Blind Method , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Brain Stimul ; 4(1): 17-27, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21255751

ABSTRACT

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ablative neurosurgical procedures are established interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but their use may be limited in part by neuropsychological adverse effects. Additional neuromodulation strategies are being developed that aim to match or exceed the efficacy of ECT/ablative surgery with a better neurocognitive side effect profile. In this review, we briefly discuss the neurocognitive effects of ECT and ablative neurosurgical procedures, then synthesize the available neurocognitive information for emerging neuromodulation therapies, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, transcranial direct current stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. The available evidence suggests these procedures may be more cognitively benign relative to ECT or ablative neurosurgical procedures, though further research is clearly needed to fully evaluate the neurocognitive effects, both positive and negative, of these novel neuromodulation interventions.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Depression/surgery , Depression/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/psychology , Electroconvulsive Therapy/psychology , Neurosurgical Procedures/psychology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/psychology , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/psychology , Cognition , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Depression/drug therapy , Drug Resistance , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electroconvulsive Therapy/methods , Humans , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL