Patient experiences of receiving a diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) presents with a wide range of clinical symptoms and comorbidities that impact quality of life. The diagnosis is challenging and often delayed due to the heterogeneity of the disease and lack of diagnostic biomarkers, which adds to the disease burden by affecting patients' psychosocial adaptation and overall well-being. Previous studies have revealed that healthcare professionals and the public have a limited understanding and familiarity with the condition, which leads to disapproval and skepticism that greatly impact patients' social spheres and welfare. While physical manifestations have been widely discussed, the psychosocial impact and the importance of receiving a diagnosis have not been fully studied in the current literature. This survey study investigated the impact of diagnosis in hEDS patients, selected from the University of Miami's hEDS registry. Survey questions were formulated based on clinical expertise and literature review. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman's correlation were used for data analysis. The median age at symptom presentation was 10 years, with a median gap of 4 years before the initial medical evaluation. On average, it took 10 years to receive a diagnosis of hEDS. Nearly all participants (95.2%) expressed receiving a diagnosis as "important" or "highly important," with 81.9% agreeing that it helped them cope with their condition better, 76.8% could better manage their symptoms, and felt more in control of their long-term care. Participants mostly had a positive emotional reaction and experienced an improvement in the support they were receiving from their caregivers and healthcare providers after receiving a diagnosis of hEDS. This study demonstrates that receiving a diagnosis could positively impact the patient's support, quality of care, and overall well-being.

Dispersed DNA variants underlie hearing loss in South Florida's minority population.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the genetic causes of sensorineural hearing loss in racial and ethnic minorities of South Florida by reviewing demographic, phenotypic, and genetic data on 136 patients presenting to the Hereditary Hearing Loss Clinic at the University of Miami. In our retrospective chart review, of these patients, half self-identified as Hispanic, and the self-identified racial distribution was 115 (86%) White, 15 (11%) Black, and 6 (4%) Asian. Our analysis helps to reduce the gap in understanding the prevalence, impact, and genetic factors related to hearing loss among diverse populations. RESULTS: The causative gene variant or variants were identified in 54 (40%) patients, with no significant difference in the molecular diagnostic rate between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics. However, the total solve rate based on race was 40%, 47%, and 17% in Whites, Blacks, and Asians, respectively. In Non-Hispanic Whites, 16 different variants were identified in 13 genes, with GJB2 (32%), MYO7A (11%), and SLC26A4 (11%) being the most frequently implicated genes. In White Hispanics, 34 variants were identified in 20 genes, with GJB2 (22%), MYO7A (7%), and STRC-CATSPER2 (7%) being the most common. In the Non-Hispanic Black cohort, the gene distribution was evenly dispersed, with 11 variants occurring in 7 genes, and no variant was identified in 3 Hispanic Black probands. For the Asian cohort, only one gene variant was found out of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the diagnostic rate of genetic studies in hearing loss varies according to race in South Florida, with more heterogeneity in racial and ethnic minorities. Further studies to delineate deafness gene variants in underrepresented populations, such as African Americans/Blacks from Hispanic groups, are much needed to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in genetic diagnoses.

Deletion of first noncoding exon in ANKRD11 leads to KBG syndrome.

Phenotypic features of KBG syndrome include craniofacial anomalies, short stature, cognitive disability and behavioral findings. The syndrome is caused by heterozygous pathogenic single nucleotide variants and indels in ANKRD11, or a heterozygous deletion of 16q24.3 that includes ANKRD11. We performed genome sequencing on a patient with clinical manifestations of KBG syndrome including distinct craniofacial features as well as a history of mild intellectual disability and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. This led to the identification of a 43 kb intragenic deletion of ANKRD11 affecting the first noncoding exon while leaving the coding regions intact. Review of the literature shows that this is the smallest 5' deletion affecting only the noncoding exons of ANKRD11. Real-time polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that the copy number variant was not present in either of the proband's parents, suggesting it occurred de novo. RNA expression analysis demonstrated significantly decreased transcript abundance compared to controls. This provides new evidence for haploinsufficiency as a mechanism of disease in KBG syndrome.

KBG syndrome.

CLINICAL DESCRIPTION: KBG syndrome is characterized by macrodontia of upper central incisors, distinctive craniofacial features such as triangular face, prominent nasal bridge, thin upper lip and synophrys; skeletal findings including short stature, delayed bone age, and costovertebral anomalies; and developmental delay/intellectual disability sometimes associated with seizures and EEG abnormalities. The condition was named KBG syndrome after the initials of the last names of three original families reported in 1975. EPIDEMIOLOGY: The prevalence of KBG syndrome is not established. There are over 100 patients reported in the literature. It is likely that KBG syndrome is underreported due to incomplete recognition and very mild presentations of the disorder in some individuals. KBG syndrome is typically milder in females. ETIOLOGY: Causative variants in ANKRD11 have been identified in affected individuals. The vast majority of identified variants are loss of function, which include nonsense and frameshift variants and larger deletions at 16q24.3. Haploinsufficiency appears to be the mechanism of pathogenicity. GENETIC COUNSELING: Familial and de novo cases have been reported. Causative de novo variants occur approximately one third of the time. Transmission follows an autosomal dominant pattern. The syndrome displays inter- and intra-familial variability.