First Reported Series of Cerebral Angiography Performed at an Outpatient Center: Safety and Satisfaction Results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are increasingly common venues for same-day neurosurgical procedures, allowing for cost-effective, high-quality patient care. We present the first and largest series of patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography at an ASC to demonstrate the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of outpatient endovascular care. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography at our ASC between January 1, 2024, and May 29, 2024. Data collected included vascular access approach, procedural duration, turnover time, and periprocedural complications. Using a standardized 2-week postprocedural survey, patients were asked to provide comments and rate their subjective satisfaction from a 1 to 5 scale, with "5" being completely satisfied. All cases were performed with a physician team comprising 1 attending neuroendovascular neurosurgery and 1 neuroendovascular fellow present. Fentanyl and midazolam were administered for conscious sedation in all cases. RESULTS: Among the 67 patients included in this series, the mean procedural duration was 29.4 ± 8.6 minutes. The mean turnover time was 13.7 ± 3.6 minutes. Between transradial (46 of 67 [68.7%]) and transfemoral (21 of 67 [31.3%]) access site approaches, there were no statistically significant differences in mean procedural duration (29.4 ± 8.0 vs 29.2 ± 9.9 minutes, respectively; P = .72) or turnover time (14.0 ± 3.9 vs 12.9 ± 2.8 minutes, respectively; P = .4). No complications occurred periprocedurally or within the 2-week follow-up period. A total of 48 (71.6%) of 67 patients responded to the postprocedural survey, all of whom unanimously reported a score of "5." CONCLUSION: We found that diagnostic cerebral angiography performed at our ASC was safe and effective for patient care. In addition, all survey respondents (71.6% of those provided the survey) reported highest levels of satisfaction. The integration of neuroendovascular procedures into ASCs potentially offers a cost-effective and highly efficient option in an evolving economic landscape.

Lumbar laminectomy in a captive, adult polar bear (Ursus maritimus).

BACKGROUND: Animals held in captivity tend to live longer than do their wild counterparts, and as such, are prone to developing age-related degenerative injuries. Here, we present a case of an adult female polar bear with symptomatic lumbar stenosis. There is a paucity of literature on large mammalian spine surgery, and anatomical differences between humans and other vertebrates must be taken into consideration. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 24-year-old female polar bear residing at the zoo was found to have decreased motor function in her hind legs. Diagnostic myelography performed at the L7/S1 level demonstrated lumbar stenosis at L5/6 for which a laminectomy was performed. Postoperatively, she returned to premorbid functional level, with no apparent associated adverse sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of spine surgery in a polar bear and demonstrates that neurosurgical diagnostic and operative techniques developed for humans can also be applied to large mammals with successful results.

Intrasellar pituitary schwannoma.

Schwannomas are common in the central nervous system, but only a few cases in the pituitary fossa have been reported. Described here is a case of an intrasellar schwannoma associated with headaches and behavioural changes, which responded to subtotal excision of the lesion. The diagnosis of intrasellar schwannoma was made on the basis of a constellation of microscopic findings, especially histologic features and immunohistochemical markers. The clinical and laboratory presentation, surgical procedure used and microscopic findings are compared with those in the literature.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The use of metal cage prosthetic devices in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) has increased rapidly. One of these devices is the titanium Rabea cage (Signus, Alzenau, Germany) [correction]. There are no peer-reviewed objective reports on the use of these cages in cervical discectomy. PURPOSE: The authors present preliminary outcomes data on the Rabea cage. This study is intended to provide adjunct data for surgeons who are using or are considering the use of these devices. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Patients in a private practice were studied prospectively as part of a long-term assessment of outcomes using several surgical procedures. Data were collated and analyzed by an independent researcher. PATIENT SAMPLE: Rabea cages were used in consecutive candidates (n=37) for ACDF. The results using Rabea cages were compared with two prospectively studied control groups, one historical (n=66) and one concurrent (n=28), both groups using ACDF with bone allograft and no instrumentation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Success at 6 months after surgery was determined using six major patient-reported outcome measures, including visual analog scales (VAS) for arm and neck pain, the Oswestry pain and disability scale, four-part (excellent-through-poor) scales for measurement of return to activities of daily living or to work and satisfaction with the results of surgery. Perioperative complications, number of vertebral levels fused, and worker's compensation and smoking status were also compared among the study groups. Fusion and subsidence were evaluated for the Rabea cage group. METHODS: Criteria for inclusion consisted of consecutive patients who presented with unremitting radicular arm pain, with or without neck pain, and/or a neurological deficit that correlated with appropriate level and side neural compression on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Questionnaire follow-up was at 6 months after surgery with 100% compliance. RESULTS: A total of 50 cages were implanted in the 37 patients. At 6-month follow-up, 78% of patients reported successful arm pain relief (VAS scores below 5). Patient satisfaction was successful in 78% of the cases. Other success rates included neck pain relief in 73% and Oswestry pain and disability scale in 70%. There was a median improvement in the Oswestry scores of 28 points (61% change). Worker's compensation patients fared dramatically worse than did the noncompensation patients in all outcome measurements. Combining all three study groups resulted in significantly worse outcomes for multilevel than for single-level procedures and for smokers compared with nonsmokers, but low case numbers precluded conclusive analysis for the Rabea group alone. In the Rabea group there were two complications, neither cage related, whereas none were reported for the ACDF controls. Rabea group fusion rates were 84% at 3 months and 95% at 6 months, but the clinical relevance of this radiological evidence when metal prostheses are used is questionable. The outcomes results were clinically and statistically indistinguishable from those of our control groups and were similar to published studies using other titanium cages. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective, independently conducted report on Rabea cages. Results of the short-term (6 months) follow-up did not differ from outcomes results in our patients who have undergone ACDF with bone allograft. Although this is a preliminary assessment, the Rabea cage may represent an alternative to bone dowels and hip graft. As is the case for other allografts, artificial or bone, the main advantage is elimination of donor site complications, and the disadvantages include difficulty in radiographic assessment of fusion and potential for cage subsidence.

Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm?

OBJECT: The authors assessed the efficacy and outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy performed on an outpatient basis by administering six questionnaires before and at five time points after surgery. The results were compared with those reported in literature in which the success rates vary between 70% and 80% and in excess of 90%. The authors use the methodology and data derived from their study to evaluate critically the relevance of these two categories of success rates. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 212 consecutive, eligible patients who underwent outpatient microscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: no previous lumbar lesion had been treated. Data were collected from questionnaires given to the patients before and at five time points after surgery, including at a variable final follow-up examination (mean 2 years postoperatively). Data were collated and analyzed independently by individuals other than the operating surgeons. In both bi- and multivariate analyses, only two preoperative parameters were prognostically significant. The first factor was Workers' Compensation status, which had a negative effect on outcome. The second factor was patient age, which also had a negative effect and was linear with increasing age between 25 years and 56 years--that is, the ages most commonly encountered in cases of herniated disc. Successful outcome rates were as follows: leg pain relief according to a visual analog scale (VAS), 80%; back pain relief (VAS), 77%; Oswestry Low Back Disability Index, 78%; satisfaction with the results of surgery, 76%; return to normal daily activities, 65%; and return to work, 61%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the evidence that lumbar microdiscectomy performed on an outpatient basis is a very safe and effective means of treating sciatic pain due to disc herniation. The authors believe that their outcome success rates of 75 to 80% are more realistic than those of 90% or more found in some reports.