Population Pharmacokinetics of Sertraline in Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders.

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of sertraline in Mexican patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Fifty-nine patients (13 to 76 years old) treated with doses of sertraline between 12.5 and 100 mg/day were included. Plasma sertraline concentrations were determined in blood samples and five of the main substances of abuse were determined by rapid tests in urine samples. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacogenetic factors were also evaluated. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software with first-order conditional estimation method. A one-compartment model with proportional residual error adequately described the sertraline concentrations versus time. CYP2D6*2 polymorphism and CYP2C19 phenotypes significantly influenced sertraline clearance, which had a population mean value of 66 L/h in the final model. The absorption constant and volume of distribution were fixed at 0.855 1/h and 20.2 L/kg, respectively. The model explained 11.3% of the interindividual variability in sertraline clearance. The presence of the CYP2D6*2 polymorphism caused a 23.1% decrease in sertraline clearance, whereas patients with intermediate and poor phenotype of CYP2C19 showed 19.06% and 48.26% decreases in sertraline clearance, respectively. The model was internally validated by bootstrap and visual predictive check. Finally, stochastic simulations were performed to propose dosing regimens to achieve therapeutic levels that contribute to improving treatment response.

Evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for amikacin dosage individualization in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability for dosage individualization and Bayesian adaptive control of several literature-retrieved amikacin population pharmacokinetic models in patients who were critically ill. METHODS: Four population pharmacokinetic models, three of them customized for critically-ill patients, were applied using pharmacokinetic software to fifty-one adult patients on conventional amikacin therapy admitted to the intensive care unit. An estimation of patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters for each model was obtained by retrospective analysis of the amikacin serum concentrations measured (n = 162) and different clinical covariates. The model performance for a priori estimation of the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum serum drug concentration (C(max)) targets was obtained. KEY FINDINGS: Our results provided valuable confirmation of the clinical importance of the choice of population pharmacokinetic models when selecting amikacin dosages for patients who are critically ill. Significant differences in model performance were especially evident when only information concerning clinical covariates was used for dosage individualization and over the two most critical determinants of clinical efficacy of amikacin i.e. the AUC and C(max) values. CONCLUSIONS: Only a single amikacin serum level seemed necessary to diminish the influence of population model on dosage individualization.