Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 63(3): 173-179, mayo-jun. 2012. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-99427

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La evaluación perceptual de la calidad vocal sigue siendo un importante método para evaluar los trastornos vocales. El método GRABS se ha consolidado como una escala frecuentemente utilizada para puntuar la severidad de una disfonía, pero no se ha publicado un protocolo estándar para guiarse. El entrenamiento es importante para alcanzar una buena concordancia en la calificación de sus parámetros entre distintos observadores, sin embargo, las referencias bibliográficas más citadas no describen orientaciones para su uso clínico, muestras a analizar o calibración. Material y método: Este estudio investigó el efecto de voces patrón y la espectrografía debanda estrecha en el entrenamiento del GRABS de profesionales no expertos. Las voces de 107 pacientes fueron evaluadas por 4 profesionales no expertos utilizando la escala GRABS en 2 sesiones, primero sin voces patrón ni espectrograma y 6 meses después con voces patrón y espectrograma de banda estrecha. Resultados: Los resultados muestran que las voces patrón y el espectrograma ayudaron a mejorarla fiabilidad de los parámetros G, B, A y S. La concordancia entre los distintos observadores de acuerdo al estadístico k fue significativamente mayor con la adición de la información espectrográfica para los parámetros B y S. Discusión: Este estudio demuestra que los profesionales no expertos mejoran significativamente sus puntuaciones tras el entrenamiento con voces patrón y la visualización del espectrograma de banda estrecha(AU)


Introduction: Perceptual evaluation of voice quality remains a key standard for judgment of vocal impairment. The GRABS method has become a commonly-used scale for rating severity of dysphonia, but it has no published, standardised protocol to follow. Training is important for reaching good interrater agreement for its parameters; however, the references most often cited for the GRABS provide no guidelines for clinical administration, speech material or rating calibration. This study investigated the effect of anchors (standard reference voices) and visible speech (narrow band spectrogram) in training non-expert professionals in the GRABS method. Material & Methods: Four inexperienced listeners evaluated 107 recorded pathological voices using the GRABS scale in 2 separate sessions; at first, without a visible spectrogram and then,6 months later, with anchors and a narrow band spectrogram as additional information. Results: The results show that anchors and visible speech helped to improve the reliability of G, B, A and S parameters. Interrater agreement according to k statistics was significantly stronger with the addition of spectrographic information for rating breathiness and strain. Discussion: This study found that non-expert listeners showed significant improvement after training with external anchors (standard reference voices) and a narrow band spectrogram(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Dysphonia/therapy , Sound Spectrography/methods , Psychoacoustics , Vocal Cords/physiopathology , Voice Disorders/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ; 63(3): 173-9, 2012.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22153964

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Perceptual evaluation of voice quality remains a key standard for judgment of vocal impairment. The GRABS method has become a commonly-used scale for rating severity of dysphonia, but it has no published, standardised protocol to follow. Training is important for reaching good interrater agreement for its parameters; however, the references most often cited for the GRABS provide no guidelines for clinical administration, speech material or rating calibration. This study investigated the effect of anchors (standard reference voices) and visible speech (narrow band spectrogram) in training non-expert professionals in the GRABS method. MATERIAL & METHODS: Four inexperienced listeners evaluated 107 recorded pathological voices using the GRABS scale in 2 separate sessions; at first, without a visible spectrogram and then, 6 months later, with anchors and a narrow band spectrogram as additional information. RESULTS: The results show that anchors and visible speech helped to improve the reliability of G, B, A and S parameters. Interrater agreement according to k statistics was significantly stronger with the addition of spectrographic information for rating breathiness and strain. DISCUSSION: This study found that non-expert listeners showed significant improvement after training with external anchors (standard reference voices) and a narrow band spectrogram.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Dysphonia/psychology , Psychoacoustics , Severity of Illness Index , Sound Spectrography , Vocal Cords/physiopathology , Voice Quality , Voice , Dysphonia/diagnosis , Dysphonia/etiology , Dysphonia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Laryngeal Edema/complications , Laryngeal Edema/physiopathology , Learning Curve , Male , Observer Variation , Pattern Recognition, Physiological , Retrospective Studies , Stroboscopy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...