Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 507, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) incur substantial costs on the health system that could be partially avoided with adequate outpatient care. Complications of chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), are considered ACSC. Previous studies have shown that hospitalizations due to diabetes have a significant financial burden. In Mexico, DM is a major health concern and a leading cause of death, but there is limited evidence available. This study aimed to estimate the direct costs of hospitalizations by DM-related ACSC in the Mexican public health system. METHODS: We selected three hospitals from each of Mexico's main public institutions: the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), the Ministry of Health (MoH), and the Institute of Social Security and Services for State Workers (ISSSTE). We employed a bottom-up microcosting approach from the healthcare provider perspective to estimate the total direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC. Input data regarding length of stay (LoS), consultations, medications, colloid/crystalloid solutions, procedures, and laboratory/medical imaging studies were obtained from clinical records of a random sample of 532 hospitalizations out of a total of 1,803 DM-related ACSC (ICD-10 codes) discharges during 2016. RESULTS: The average cost per DM-related ACSC hospitalization varies among institutions, ranging from $1,427 in the MoH to $1,677 in the IMSS and $1,754 in the ISSSTE. The three institutions' largest expenses are LoS and procedures. Peripheral circulatory and renal complications were the major drivers of hospitalization costs for patients with DM-related ACSC. Direct costs due to hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC in these three institutions represent 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) dedicated to health and social services and 2% of total hospital care expenses. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC vary considerably across institutions. Disparities in such costs for the same ACSC among different institutions suggest potential disparities in care quality across primary and hospital settings (processes and resource utilization), which should be further investigated to ensure optimal supply utilization. Prioritizing preventive measures for peripheral circulatory and renal complications in DM patients could be highly beneficial.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Diabetes Mellitus , Hospitalization , Humans , Mexico , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Ambulatory Care/economics , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Young Adult
2.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(6): 716-725, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31869536

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perception of the quality of ambulatory care in users of health services in 2012 and 2018, by indigenous and non-indigenous condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With information from two population surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 and Ensanut 100k) the quality of care was analyzed based on indicators of structure, process, health outcome and care satisfaction. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2018, the use of private health services increased; favorable opinion about the conditions of the site, and perception of short waiting times decreased among non-indigenous people. In public health services, the supply of medicines remained high, the laboratory and Rx tests in the same care unit and pharma- cology treatment explanation decreased, particularly among non-indigenous patients. Perception of health improvement and satisfaction of care was adequate. CONCLUSIONS: An ambulatory care model aimed to response needs and expectations of the most vulnerable population, mainly the indigenous population, is a priority.


OBJETIVO: Comparar la percepción de la calidad de atención ambulatoria de servicios de salud en 2012 y 2018, por condición indígena y no indígena. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Con información de dos encuestas poblacionales (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 y Ensanut 100k) se analizó la calidad de atención con indicadores de estructura, proceso, resultado en salud y satisfacción. RESULTADOS: Entre 2012 y 2018 aumentó la utilización de servicios privados, disminuyó la buena opinión sobre las condiciones del lugar y la percepción de tiempo de espera corto para utilizadores no indígenas. Para servicios públicos se mantuvo alto el surtimiento de medicamentos, disminuyó la realización de estudios de laboratorio y gabinete en la unidad de atención y la explicación del tratamiento farmacológico principalmente en no indígenas. La percepción de mejoría y la satisfacción fue buena. CONCLUSIONES: Es prioritario un modelo de atención ambulatoria acorde con las necesidades y expectativas de la población más vulnerable y, principalmente, indígena.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Health Services, Indigenous/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Population Groups , Quality of Health Care , Vulnerable Populations , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Poverty , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(6): 716-725, nov.-dic. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1252160

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Objetivo: Comparar la percepción de la calidad de atención ambulatoria de servicios de salud en 2012 y 2018, por condición indígena y no indígena. Material y métodos. Con información de dos encuestas poblacionales (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 y Ensanut 100k) se analizó la calidad de atención con indicadores de estructura, proceso, resultado en salud y satisfacción. Resultados: Entre 2012 y 2018 aumentó la utilización de servicios privados, disminuyó la buena opinión sobre las condiciones del lugar y la percepción de tiempo de espera corto para utilizadores no indígenas. Para servicios públicos se mantuvo alto el surtimiento de medicamentos, disminuyó la realización de estudios de laboratorio y gabinete en la unidad de atención y la explicación del tratamiento farmacológico principalmente en no indígenas. La percepción de mejoría y la satisfacción fue buena. Conclusión: Es prioritario un modelo de atención ambulatoria acorde con las necesidades y expectativas de la población más vulnerable y, principalmente, indígena.


Abstract: Objective: To compare the perception of the quality of ambulatory care in users of health services in 2012 and 2018, by indigenous and non-indigenous condition. Materials and methods: With information from two population surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 and Ensanut 100k) the quality of care was analyzed based on indicators of structure, process, health outcome and care satisfaction. Results: Between 2012 and 2018, the use of private health services increased; favorable opinion about the conditions of the site, and perception of short waiting times decreased among non-indigenous people. In public health services, the supply of medicines remained high, the laboratory and Rx tests in the same care unit and pharmacology treatment explanation decreased, particularly among non-indigenous patients. Perception of health improvement and satisfaction of care was adequate. Conclusion: An ambulatory care model aimed to response needs and expectations of the most vulnerable population, mainly the indigenous population, is a priority.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Quality of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Vulnerable Populations , Population Groups , Ambulatory Care/standards , Health Services, Indigenous/standards , Poverty , Time Factors , Mexico
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 25, 2019 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30634946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research and different organizations have proposed indicators to monitor the quality of maternal and child healthcare, such indicators are used for different purposes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of indicators for the central phases of the maternal and child healthcare continuum of care (pregnancy, childbirth, newborn care and postpartum). METHOD: A search conducted using international repositories, national and international indicator sets, scientific articles published between 2012 and 2016, and grey literature. The eligibility criteria was documents in Spanish or English with indicators to monitor aspects of the continuum of care phases of interest. The identified indicators were characterized as follows: formula, justification, evidence level, pilot study, indicator type, phase of the continuum, intended organizational level of application, level of care, and income level of the countries. Selection was based on the characteristics associated with scientific soundness (formula, evidence level, and reliability). RESULTS: We identified 1791 indicators. Three hundred forty-six were duplicated, which resulted in 1445 indicators for analysis. Only 6.7% indicators exhibited all requirements for scientific soundness. The distribution by the classifying variables is clearly uneven, with a predominance of indicators for childbirth, hospital care and facility level. CONCLUSIONS: There is a broad choice of indicators for maternal and child healthcare. However, most indicators lack demonstrated scientific soundness and refer to particular continuum phases and levels within the healthcare system. Additional efforts are needed to identify good indicators for a comprehensive maternal and child healthcare monitoring system.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/standards , Postnatal Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care , Continuity of Patient Care , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Infant Health , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Health , Parturition , Perinatal Care/standards , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/standards
5.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 32(3): 251-261, mayo-jun. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-174128

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Identificar coincidencias y diferencias en la identificación y la priorización de problemas de los servicios de salud materna en México, desde las perspectivas del conocimiento tácito y el conocimiento explícito, que ofrezcan evidencias que contribuyan a alcanzar los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Método: Estudio mixto, realizado en tres etapas: 1) sistematización de problemas de los servicios de atención a la salud materna identificados por el conocimiento tácito (derivado de la experiencia profesional); 2) identificación de problemas de los servicios de atención a la salud materna en América Latina abordados por el conocimiento explícito (publicaciones científicas); 3) comparación de problemas identificados por los conocimientos tácito y explícito. Resultados: Los principales problemas identificados según el conocimiento tácito están vinculados con la mala calidad de la atención, mientras que aquellos mayormente abordados por el conocimiento explícito se refieren a barreras de acceso a la atención en los servicios de salud. Aproximadamente el 70% de los problemas identificados en el conocimiento tácito son señalados en el conocimiento explícito. Paralelamente, el 70% de los problemas identificados en la literatura también son considerados por el conocimiento tácito. No obstante, al comparar los problemas uno a uno no se encuentran similitudes estadísticamente significativas entre ambos enfoques. Conclusiones: El estudio mostró que la identificación de problemas en los servicios de atención a la salud materna por el conocimiento tácito y por el conocimiento explícito es medianamente comparable, según el índice de comparabilidad utilizado, y subraya el interés de integrar ambos abordajes a fin de mejorar la priorización y la toma de decisiones hacia los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible


Objective: To identify coincidences and differences in the identification and prioritization of maternal healthcare service problems in Mexico based on the perspective of tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge that may offer evidence that can contribute to attaining the Sustainable Development Goals. Methods: Mixed study performed in three stages: 1) systematization of maternal healthcare service problems identified by tacit knowledge (derived from professional experience); 2) identification of maternal healthcare service problems in Latin America addressed by explicit knowledge (scientific publications); 3) comparison between the problems identified by tacit and explicit knowledge. Results: The main problems of maternal health services identified by tacit knowledge are related to poor quality of care, while the predominant problems studied in the scientific literature are related to access barriers to health services. Approximately, 70% of the problems identified by tacit knowledge are also mentioned in the explicit knowledge. Conversely, 70% of the problems identified in the literature are also considered by tacit knowledge. Nevertheless, when looking at the problems taken one by one, no statistically significant similarities were found. Conclusions: The study discovered that the identification of maternal health service problems by tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge is fairly comparable, according to the comparability index used in the study, and highlights the interest of integrating both approaches in order to improve prioritization and decision making towards the Sustainable Development Goals


Subject(s)
Humans , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Health Literacy , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Mexico/epidemiology , Problem Solving , Quality Improvement , Sustainable Development Indicators/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research
6.
Gac Sanit ; 32(3): 251-261, 2018.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28687254

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify coincidences and differences in the identification and prioritization of maternal healthcare service problems in Mexico based on the perspective of tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge that may offer evidence that can contribute to attaining the Sustainable Development Goals. METHODS: Mixed study performed in three stages: 1) systematization of maternal healthcare service problems identified by tacit knowledge (derived from professional experience); 2) identification of maternal healthcare service problems in Latin America addressed by explicit knowledge (scientific publications); 3) comparison between the problems identified by tacit and explicit knowledge. RESULTS: The main problems of maternal health services identified by tacit knowledge are related to poor quality of care, while the predominant problems studied in the scientific literature are related to access barriers to health services. Approximately, 70% of the problems identified by tacit knowledge are also mentioned in the explicit knowledge. Conversely, 70% of the problems identified in the literature are also considered by tacit knowledge. Nevertheless, when looking at the problems taken one by one, no statistically significant similarities were found. CONCLUSIONS: The study discovered that the identification of maternal health service problems by tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge is fairly comparable, according to the comparability index used in the study, and highlights the interest of integrating both approaches in order to improve prioritization and decision making towards the Sustainable Development Goals.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Priorities , Maternal Health Services/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Sustainable Development , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...