ABSTRACT
We present a retrospective multicenter study of pralatrexate treatment outcomes in an Australian practice setting for patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma who had failed 1+ systemic therapies, treated via a compassionate access program. Endpoints assessed included response rates, toxicities, and subsequent therapies. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and time to best response, were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The study included 31 patients, with median age 69 years. We demonstrated ORR of 35.5% (n = 11), including 4 complete responses (13%) and 7 partial responses (23%). The predicted median OS was 10 months, with EFS of 9 months, and PFS of 9 months. Median TTNT was 8 months. Mucositis was the most commonly observed toxicity. This study - the second largest real-world cohort reported to date - underscores the importance of pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma, as well as its acceptable toxicity profile.
Subject(s)
Lymphoma, T-Cell , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Aged , Aminopterin/analogs & derivatives , Australia/epidemiology , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) confers a survival advantage for the minority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who achieve a complete cytogenetic response. The question of whether IFN-alpha-responsive patients can experience further improvements with imatinib has not been answered. Imatinib offers clear quality of life advantages. Furthermore, patients who achieve a major molecular response (MMR) while receiving imatinib are likely to remain progression free. METHODS: A total of 23 patients treated for a median of 4.5 years with IFN-alpha (range, 1.6-14.3 years) who had achieved a complete (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph] negative, n = 15 patients) or near-complete (1-10% Ph, n = 8 patients) cytogenetic response were studied. The primary objective was to determine whether ceasing therapy with IFN-alpha and switching to 12 months of imatinib treatment at a dose of 400 mg/day could improve the molecular response as assessed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction of BCR-ABL transcript levels. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Every patient who had not achieved an MMR while receiving IFN-alpha (n = 16 patients) achieved an MMR after a median of 3 months of imatinib treatment. Significant BCR-ABL reductions (median, 63-fold; range, 18-425-fold) occurred in 15 of these patients. Every patient who had already achieved an MMR while receiving IFN-alpha (n = 7 patients) maintained an MMR while receiving imatinib. No patients discontinued imatinib due to toxicity, but 1 patient withdrew consent. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that switching IFN-alpha-responsive patients to imatinib leads to a rapid improvement in achieving an MMR, a response with established prognostic value, and is well tolerated. The study should help patients and their physicians make evidence-based decisions regarding the potential benefits and risks of switching to imatinib.
