Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 32(10): 2115-2131, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32865757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a novel human-infecting coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, had emerged. The WHO has classified the epidemic as a "public health emergency of international concern". A dramatic situation has unfolded with thousands of deaths, occurring mainly in the aged and very ill people. Epidemiological studies suggest that immune system function is impaired in elderly individuals and these subjects often present a deficiency in fat-soluble and hydrosoluble vitamins. METHODS: We searched for reviews describing the characteristics of autoimmune diseases and the available therapeutic protocols for their treatment. We set them as a paradigm with the purpose to uncover common pathogenetic mechanisms between these pathological conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we searched for studies describing the possible efficacy of vitamins A, D, E, and C in improving the immune system function. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 infection induces strong immune system dysfunction characterized by the development of an intense proinflammatory response in the host, and the development of a life-threatening condition defined as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This leads to acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), mainly in aged people. High mortality and lethality rates have been observed in elderly subjects with CoV-2-related infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamins may shift the proinflammatory Th17-mediated immune response arising in autoimmune diseases towards a T-cell regulatory phenotype. This review discusses the possible activity of vitamins A, D, E, and C in restoring normal antiviral immune system function and the potential therapeutic role of these micronutrients as part of a therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/diet therapy , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytokines/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diet therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Vitamins/immunology , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Aged , Ascorbic Acid/immunology , Ascorbic Acid/pharmacology , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Th17 Cells/drug effects , Th17 Cells/immunology , Vitamin A/immunology , Vitamin A/pharmacology , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/immunology , Vitamin D/pharmacology , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin E/immunology , Vitamin E/pharmacology , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , Vitamins/pharmacology
2.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 158, 2018 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30157892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for cutaneous lymphoma and Total Skin Electrons Beam Irradiation (TSEBI) is generally used to treat diffuse cutaneous lymphoma and some cases of localized disease. Helical IMRT (HI) allows to treat complex target with optimal dose distribution and organ at risk sparing, so helical tomotherapy has been proposed as alternative technique to TSEBI but only one preliminary report has been published. METHODS: Three patients treated (from May 2013 to December 2014) with Helical IMRT, with a total dose between 24 and 30 Gy, were retrospectively evaluated. Data about dosimetric features, response and acute toxicity were registered and analyzed. Planned target coverage was compared with daily in vivo measures and dose calculation based on volumetric images used for set up evaluation as well. RESULTS: The patients had a mean measured surface fraction dose ranging from 1.54 Gy up to 2.0 Gy. A planned target dose ranging from 85 to 120% of prescription doses was obtained. All doses to Organs At Risk were within the required constraints. Particular attention was posed on "whole bone marrow" planned V10Gy, V12Gy and V20Gy values, ranging respectively between 23 and 43%, 20.1 and 38% and 9.8 and 24%. A comparison with the theoretical homologous values obtained with TSEBI has shown much lower values with TSEBI. Even if treatment was given in sequence to the skin of the upper and lower hemi-body, all the patients had anaemia, requiring blood transfusions, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Based on our limited results TSEBI should still be considered the standard method to treat total skin because of its pattern of acute and late toxicities and the dose distribution. In this particular case the better target coverage obtained with HI can be paid in terms of worse toxicity. Helical IMRT can instead be considered optimal in treating large, convex, cutaneous areas where it is difficult to use multiple electrons fields in relation with the clinical results and the limited and reversible toxicities.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/radiotherapy , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Whole-Body Irradiation/methods , Electrons , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mycosis Fungoides/radiotherapy , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 168(1): 76-82, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752757

ABSTRACT

Sometimes, cardiac catheterisation and electrophysiological procedures, diagnostic and interventional, require an anaesthesiological support. The anaesthesiologist receives radiation doses depending on various factors, such as type of procedure and exposure modality, anaesthesiological technique, individual protective devices and operator experience. The aim of this study was to investigate the dose per procedure, the exposure inhomogeneity and the effective dose, E, of a senior anaesthesiologist in the haemodynamic laboratory of Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo. The dose monitoring was routinely performed with sets of several thermoluminescent dosemeters and an electronic personal dosemeter. The study covered 300 consecutive procedures over 1 y. The anaesthesiologist wore a protective apron, a thyroid collar and glasses (0.5 mm lead-equivalent).


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/methods , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Algorithms , Cardiac Catheterization , Electronics , Equipment Design , Humans , Protective Clothing , Protective Devices , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radiography, Interventional , Radiology, Interventional , Radiometry , Risk , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
4.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 191(7): 573-81, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747263

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) started a working group dedicated to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment. In this work, we performed a multicenter planning study on patients who were candidates for SBRT in the treatment of prostate cancer with the aim of evaluating the dosimetric consistency among the different hospitals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen centers were provided the contours of 5 patients. Plans were performed following the dose prescription and constraints for organs at risk (OARs) of a reference paper. The dose prescription was 35 Gy in five fractions for the planning target volume (PTV). Different techniques were used (3D-CRT, fixed-Field IMRT, VMAT, CyberKnife). Plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Furthermore, the median DVH was calculated and one patient was re-planned. RESULTS: A total of 70 plans were compared. The maximum dose to the body was 107.9 ± 4.5 % (range 101.5-116.3 %). Dose at 98 % (D98 %) and mean dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) were 102.0 ± 0.9 % (global range 101.1-102.9 %) and 105.1 ± 0.6 % (range 98.6-124.6 %). Similar trends were found for D95 % and mean dose to the PTV. Important differences were found in terms of the homogeneity index. Doses to OARs were heterogeneous. The subgroups with the same treatment planning system showed differences comparable to the differences of the whole group. In the re-optimized plans, DVH differences among institutes were reduced and OAR sparing improved. CONCLUSION: Important dosimetric differences with possible clinical implications, in particular related to OARs, were found. Replanning allowed a reduction in the OAR dose and decreased standard deviations. Multicenter clinical trials on SBRT should require a preplanning study to standardize the optimization procedure.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Organs at Risk , Patient Care Planning , Patient Positioning , Preoperative Care , Radiometry/methods
5.
Cancer Immunol Res ; 1(2): 134-43, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24777501

ABSTRACT

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with (131)I-labeled L19SIP (radretumab; a small immunoprotein format antibody directed against the ED-B domain of fibronectin; ∼ 80 kDa molecular weight) has been investigated in several clinical trials. Here, we describe the use of immuno-PET imaging with iodine-124 ((124)I)-labeled L19SIP to predict doses delivered to tumor lesions and healthy organs by a subsequent radretumab RIT in patients with brain metastases from solid cancer. Bone marrow doses were evaluated both during the diagnostic phase and posttherapy, measuring activities in blood (germanium detector) and whole body (lanthanum bromide detector). Expected doses for radretumab administration (4,107 MBq/m(2)) were calculated from data obtained after administration of an average of 167 MBq (124)I-L19SIP to 6 patients. To assess lesion average doses, the positron emission tomography (PET) scanner was calibrated for the use of (124)I with an International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Body Phantom and recovery coefficients were calculated. The average dose to bone red marrow was 0.21 Gy/GBq, with high correlation between provisional and actual posttherapy doses. Although the fraction of injected activity in normal organs was similar in different patients, the antibody uptake in the neoplastic lesions varied by as much as a factor of 60. Immuno-PET with (124)I-labeled L19SIP offers significant advantages over conventional (131)I imaging, in particular accuracy of dosimetric results. Furthermore, the study indicates that antibody uptake can be highly variable even in different lesions of the same patient and that immuno-PET procedures may guide product development with armed antibodies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radioimmunotherapy/methods , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Animals , Antibodies/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...