Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle: Pathology of the lateral and posterior compartments.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for imaging the tendons and the ligaments of the ankle. MRI combines excellent tissue contrast and accurate anatomic delineation of joint structures. In the first article of this series, we discussed a compartmental approach to the interpretation of ankle pathology focusing on the anterior and medial compartments. This article will complete the MR review of the ankle, with a focus on the lateral and posterior compartments of the ankle.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle: Pathology of the anterior and medial compartments.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for imaging the tendons and the ligaments of the ankle. MRI combines excellent tissue contrast and accurate anatomic delineation of joint structures. In this pictorial essay, the first of two parts, we delineate the ankle into anatomic compartments and use this as a template for describing pathology in each compartment.

Giant right coronary artery aneurysm - A rare presentation.

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is focal dilatation of a coronary artery 1.5 times or more its normal size (Res Cardiovasc Med, 2016; 5: e32086). Coronary artery aneurysm is found in 1.2-4.9% of diagnostic coronary angiography and 1.4% at post-mortem (Heart Views, 2014; 15: 13; Clin Cardiol, 2015; 29: 439). The proximal and middle segments of the right coronary artery (RCA) are most commonly involved, followed by the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and the left circumflex arteries. The left main stem rarely develops aneurysms (Clin Cardiol, 2015; 29: 439). A giant aneurysm is a CAA> 2 cm. Giant coronary artery aneurysms (GCAA) are rare (incidence 0.02%) although cause serious complications. [4] Given the rarity of this disease, there is limited information in the literature on its presentation and there is no consensus on its optimal management option. We report a case of a GCAA with an atypical presentation and describe its management. This will add to the current small database on CAA to provide clinicians a better insight on the disease.

Incidental hepatic steatosis on unenhanced computed tomography performed for suspected renal colic: Gaps in reporting and documentation.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic steatosis is a common incidental finding on computed tomography (CT) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The aims of our study were to assess the prevalence of hepatic steatosis in ED patients with suspected renal colic and to assess documentation in radiology reports and medical charts correlated with alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. METHODS: Over 18 months from January 2016 to June 2017, all unenhanced CTs performed for suspected renal colic were reviewed. Quantitative assessment measuring hepatic and splenic attenuation in Hounsfield Units was performed. Hepatic steatosis was defined using multiple CT criteria including liver/spleen (L/S) ratio. Radiology reports, medical charts and ALT levels, if collected within 24 h of CT, were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1290 patients were included with a median age 52.5 years (range 16-98) and male predominance (835 [64.7%]). A total of 336 (26%) patients had hepatic steatosis measured by L/S ratio of ≤ 1.0. Ninety-four patients (28%) had radiology reports noting steatosis. Documentation in medical charts was noted in 18 of the 94 patients (19.1%) for whom steatosis was reported. Liver enzymes were available for 704 (54.6%) patients. There was a significantly higher mean ALT level in patients with hepatic steatosis (42.2 U/L; 95% CI 38.4-46.0) compared to patients without (28.8 U/L; 95% CI 25.7-31.9) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight multiple gaps in the reporting and evaluation of hepatic steatosis among radiologists and emergency clinicians alike. Recognising and reporting this incidental finding may impact health outcomes.

Accuracy of cough reporting by carers of Indigenous children.

AIMS: The study aims to determine the reliability of a 24-h history of reported cough presence and quality (wet/dry) compared with objectively recorded cough, and evaluate factors that may influence cough reporting. METHODS: A digital recorder (ICD-PX720, Sony, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to 47 Indigenous children for 24 h during admission at Royal Darwin Hospital. After recording, carers reported their child's cough details. Cough counts were objectively measured and details of cough reports by carer (cough present/absent, quality wet/dry, cough severity determined by visual analogue scale and verbal category descriptive score) were the main outcomes measured. Other factors examined were: carer's sex, age, education, smoking, carer's cough, parent versus non-parent, respiratory illness in child and mean parent-proxy cough-specific quality of life questionnaire. Data were entered into STATA (V.10, STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficients and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs ) were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Reporting of cough by Indigenous carers (compared with cough monitoring) was slight when a low cough threshold (0.25 coughs/h) was used (κ = 0.17, 95% CI -0.15, 0.49) and moderate when a higher cough threshold was used (κ = 0.57, 95% CI 0.28, 0.88). Carers' evaluation of wet cough disagreed with clinician's evaluation (κ = -0.24, 95% CI -0.58, 0.09). Subjective reporting of cough severity moderately correlated with objective cough rates (rs = 0.41 to 0.44, 95% CI 0.11, 0.67). None of the factors examined was associated with reliability of cough reporting. CONCLUSIONS: The unreliability of reporting of cough highlights the need for community education on the importance of cough to improve health-seeking behaviour for early detection and treatment of respiratory disease.