Wide variation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption intervals among commercially available automated external defibrillators may affect survival despite high defibrillation efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have associated interruptions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation imposed by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) with poor resuscitation outcome. In particular, the "hands-off" interval between precordial compressions and subsequent defibrillation shock has been implicated. We sought to determine the range of variation among current-generation AEDs with respect to this characteristic. MEASUREMENTS: Seven AEDs from six manufacturers were characterized via stopwatch and arrhythmia simulator with respect to the imposed hands-off interval. All AEDs were equipped with new batteries, and measurements were repeated five times for each AED. MAIN RESULTS: A wide variation in the hands-off interval between precordial compressions and shock delivery was observed, ranging from 5.2 to 28.4 secs, with only one AED achieving an interruption of <10 secs. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that this range of variation could be responsible for a more than two-fold variation in patient resuscitation success, an effect that far exceeds any defibrillation efficacy differences that may hypothetically exist. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to defibrillation waveform and dose, researchers should consider the hands-off cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption interval between cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent defibrillation shock to be an important covariate of outcome in resuscitation studies. Defibrillator design should minimize this interval to avoid potential adverse consequences on patient survival.

The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 microF, < or =200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 microF, > or =200 J). METHODS: Four groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J. RESULTS: Resuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.

The safe use of automated external defibrillators in a wet environment.

UNLABELLED: There has been concern regarding potential shock hazards for rescuers or bystanders when a defibrillator is used in a wet environment and the recommended safety procedure, moving the patient to a dry area, is not followed. OBJECTIVE: To measure the electrical potentials associated with the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) in a realistically modeled wet environment. METHODS: A raw processed turkey was used as a patient surrogate. The turkey was placed on a cement floor while pool water was applied to the surrounding area. To simulate a rescuer or bystander in the vicinity of a patient, a custom sense probe was constructed. Defibrillation shocks were delivered to the turkey and the probe was used to measure the voltage an operator/bystander would receive at different points surrounding the surrogate. The test was repeated with salt water. RESULTS: The maximum voltage occurred approximately 15 cm from the simulated patient and measured 14 V peak (current 14 mA peak) in the case of pool water, and 30 V peak (current 30 mA peak) in the case of salt water. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty volts may result in some minor sensation by the operator or bystander, but is considered unlikely to be hazardous under these circumstances. The maximum currents were lower than allowed by safety standards. Although defibrillation in a wet environment is not recommended practice, our simulation of a patient and a rescuer/bystander in a wet environment did not show significant risk should circumstances demand it.

Fixed-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: For adults, 150-J fixed-energy, impedance-compensating biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) shocks are now effectively used in automated defibrillators. However, the high energy levels delivered by adult automated defibrillators preclude their use for pediatric patients. Accordingly, we investigated a method by which adult automated defibrillators may be adapted to deliver a 50-J ICBTE shock for pediatric defibrillation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: A university-affiliated research institution. SUBJECT: Domestic piglets. INTERVENTIONS: We initially investigated four groups of anesthetized mechanically ventilated piglets weighing 3.8, 7.5, 15, and 25 kg. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with an AC current delivered to the right ventricular endocardium. After 7 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, a conventional manual defibrillator was used to deliver up to three 50-J ICBTE shocks. If ventricular fibrillation was not reversed, a 1-min interval of precordial compression preceded a second sequence of up to three shocks. The protocol was repeated until spontaneous circulation was restored, or for a total of 15 mins. In a second set of experiments, we evaluated a 150-J biphasic adult automated defibrillator that was operated in conjunction with energy-reducing electrodes such as to deliver 50-J shocks. The same resuscitation protocol was then exercised on piglets weighing 3.7, 13.5, and 24.2 kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All animals were successfully resuscitated. Postresuscitation hemodynamic and myocardial function quickly returned to baseline values in both experimental groups, and all animals survived. CONCLUSION: An adaptation of a 150-J biphasic adult automated defibrillator in which energy-reducing electrodes delivered 50-J shocks successfully resuscitated animals ranging from 3.7 to 25 kg without compromise of postresuscitation myocardial function or survival.

Energy attenuator for pediatric application of an automated external defibrillator.

Although automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) are extensively deployed to rapidly treat sudden cardiac arrest in adults, their applicability for children is presently limited. It is desirable to extend the indications for this lifesaving equipment to all ages, even though AED application to children will be rare compared with adults. It is imperative that the inherent simplicity of present adult AED operation not be compromised to extend its use to include children. We propose a method that does not affect the normal operation of an AED on adults. For adults, unmodified AEDs would be used normally with adult electrodes. However, special pediatric electrodes would be available as a disposable accessory. When used with the AED, the delivered energy would be reduced within the electrodes, and only a portion of the energy output by the AED would be delivered to the pediatric patient. These electrodes could be used in conjunction with currently deployed AEDs with electrocardiographic analysis algorithms appropriate for children. This eliminates the need for a separate AED specifically for children or the purchase of a new AED with pediatric capability to replace previously deployed models.