Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Eng Phys ; 31(7): 846-51, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19447666

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have assessed lumbar interbody fusion, but little data from direct interbody load measurements exists. This manuscript describes an interbody fusion cage with integrated 4-axis load cell that can simulate implant heights of 13, 15, 17, 19 and 21 mm. The calibrated load cell was accurate to within 7.9% for point compressive loads over the central 8 mm x 8 mm region, but up to 26.8% for eccentric loads on the outer 16 mm x 16 mm rim of the device (although typically errors were less than half). Anterior-posterior shear and lateral shear loads did not affect compressive load measurement (<1.0% and <3.5%, respectively). Moments calculated from 4 load sensing corner pillars demonstrated errors below 2.3% in lateral bending and 2.1% in flexion-extension. Although this device does not have the accuracy of other much larger corpectomy implants, it incorporates four channels of load and simulates multiple implant heights, making for a favorable comparison in this restricted space. This device has immediate use in cadaveric testing, providing data previously not attainable, and serves as a novel technological step towards an implantable interbody device with multi-axis load sensing capability. As per the authors' knowledge, no such device has previously been described.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Materials Testing/instrumentation , Biomechanical Phenomena , Calibration , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Materials Testing/methods , Models, Biological , Prostheses and Implants , Spinal Fusion , Weight-Bearing
2.
Stapp Car Crash J ; 51: 381-400, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18278605

ABSTRACT

The Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre Safety (FOCUS) headform is intended to aid safety equipment design in order to reduce the risk of eye and facial injuries. The purpose of this paper is to present a three part study that details the development and validation of the FOCUS synthetic eye and orbit and the corresponding eye injury criteria. The synthetic eye and orbit were designed to simulate the force-deflection response to in-situ dynamic impacts. In part I, the force-deflection response of the eye was determined based on dynamic blunt impact tests with human eyes. These data were used to validate the appropriate material for a biofidelic synthetic eye. In part II, force-deflection corridors developed from ten dynamic in-situ eye impacts were used to validate the design and material selections for the synthetic orbit assembly. In part III, 82 experimental tests on the FOCUS headform were conducted using steel BB projectiles to develop a conservative injury risk criteria for the FOCUS headform based on the response of the eye load cell. Injury criterion for globe rupture is strongly correlated to the data from the FOCUS eye load cell (R(2) = 0.995). Based on the response of the FOCUS eye load cell, a 50% risk of globe rupture from a 4.5 mm BB impact is shown to be 107 N. With a biofidelic synthetic eye and this projectile-specific injury criteria, the FOCUS headform can be used to conservatively evaluate the risk of globe rupture from > or = 4.5 mm diameter projectile impacts to the eye.


Subject(s)
Eye Injuries/etiology , Models, Biological , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/etiology , Eye Injuries/physiopathology , Eye, Artificial , Humans , Manikins , Risk Factors , Rupture/etiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...