Randomized study of the safety and pharmacodynamics of inhaled interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody fragment VR942.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-13 (IL-13) is a key mediator of T-helper-cell-type-2 (Th-2)-driven asthma, the inhibition of which may improve treatment outcomes. We examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of VR942, a dry-powder formulation containing CDP7766, a high-affinity anti-human-IL-13 antigen-binding antibody fragment being developed for the treatment of asthma. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study at Hammersmith Medicines Research, London, UK, which is now complete. Healthy adults aged 18-50 years (n = 40) were randomized 3:1 to a single inhaled dose of VR942 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10, or 20 mg, or placebo. Adults aged 18-50 years who were diagnosed with asthma for ≥6 months before screening, and had forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) values ≥70% of the predicted values at screening (n = 45), were randomized to once-daily inhaled VR942 0.5 or 10 mg, or placebo (2:2:1), or VR942 20 mg or placebo (3:2), for 10 days. All participants were randomized to receive VR942 or placebo based on a randomization list prepared by an independent HMR statistician using SAS® software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The primary outcome was safety and tolerability of VR942 (safety population, defined as all who received at least one dose of VR942 or placebo). This study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02473939). FINDINGS: In the VR942 and placebo groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 10/30 (33%) and 0/10 (0%) healthy participants, and in 16/29 (55%) and 9/16 (56%) participants with asthma, respectively. Mild intermittent wheezing occurred in 7 participants (VR942 20 mg, n = 4; corresponding placebo, n = 3), resolving spontaneously within 1 h. All TEAEs were mild or moderate; there were no deaths, serious adverse events, or clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or laboratory parameters. There was no clinically significant immunogenicity, with only one participant with asthma considered positive for treatment-related immunogenicity for CDP7766. INTERPRETATION: This study, considered to be the only example of a dry powder anti-IL-13 fragment antibody being administered via inhalation, demonstrated that single and repeat doses were well tolerated over a period of up to 10 days in duration. Rapid and durable inhibition of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (secondary outcome) provided evidence of pharmacological engagement with the IL-13 target in the airways of participants diagnosed with mild asthma. These data, together with the numerical improvements observed for predose FEV1, justify further clinical evaluation of VR942 in a broader population of patients with asthma, and continue to support the development of an inhaled anti-IL-13 antibody fragment as a potential future treatment that is alternative to monoclonal antibodies delivered via the parenteral route. FUNDING: Study funding and funding for the medical writing and editorial support for preparation of the manuscript were split equally between the two study co-funders (Vectura Ltd and UCB Pharma).

Inhaled apomorphine in patients with 'on-off' fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinic and home based, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: In later stages of Parkinson's disease, treatment of 'off' periods with subcutaneous apomorphine is helpful but requires injection; inhaled apomorphine would be potentially more convenient. OBJECTIVES: To identify optimal efficacy, safety and tolerability for inhaled apomorphine in reversing Parkinson's disease 'off' periods. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, 2:1 active:placebo, parallel-group, ascending dose titration study was conducted at 16 centres in 3 countries. Inhaled apomorphine was administered under observation, at escalating fine particle doses of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 mg. This was followed by at-home patient self-treatment for 2 to 4 weeks, assessed from 'on-off' diaries. RESULTS: In 55 patients, mean age 65.6 years (range 47-79), mean disease duration 12 years (range 5-22), the mean improvement in the unified PD rating scale part 3 (UPDRS 3) was significantly greater for apomorphine (mean dose 2.3 mg) at 19.5 (standard deviation 13.6) than for placebo at 9.9 (9.6), least squares mean difference 8.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 15.5, p = 0.023). During at-home testing, mean 'off' time per day was reduced by 139.8 minutes (standard deviation 149.6) for apomorphine versus 68.0 (108.6) minutes for placebo, least squares mean difference not significant at 100.5 minutes (95% confidence interval -12.0 to 212.9, p = 0.078). The onset of action was faster for apomorphine (mean 8.1 SD 6.2 minutes) than placebo (mean 13.1 SD 6.6 minutes) (p < 0.0001). Reversal of 'off' episodes was significantly more likely for episodes treated with apomorphine than those treated with placebo: apomorphine 64.6% SD 32.3 of episodes versus placebo 11.1% SD 15.3 (p < 0.0001). During at-home treatment, 36% of apomorphine and 20% of placebo patients experienced adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled apomorphine in the dose range 1.5 to 4.5 mg, significantly improved UPDRS 3 scores in the clinic, and aborted a greater proportion of 'off' periods at-home, compared to placebo. However, daily 'off' time was not significantly reduced by the use of inhaled apomorphine.

Inhalation device allows novel administration of apomorphine in men with erectile dysfunction-efficacy and safety findings.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment is greatly influenced by patient preference, and currently available oral therapies do not meet all patients' needs. New therapies and formulations are therefore being investigated. AIM: The aim of this article is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of inhaled apomorphine, VR004, in men with mild to severe ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy outcomes were the change in the proportion of positive responses to sexual encounter profile questions, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores and onset of therapeutic effect. Safety outcomes included a change in vital signs at an orthostatic challenge and adverse events (AEs). METHODS: Two consecutive, multicenter trials each comprised a 4-week no-treatment period and a 12-week "at home" treatment period with regular clinic visits. Patients (N = 211 and N = 389) were randomized to receive one of three set doses of VR004 (100-300 microg) or matching placebo in each trial. VR004 was administered by a dry-powder inhaler at least once a week. RESULTS: Efficacy was generally dose dependent. The proportion of per-protocol patients maintaining an erection long enough for successful intercourse increased in all VR004 groups vs. placebo. IIEF scores were higher in the VR004 groups compared with placebo, and the majority of responders achieved an erection within 10 minutes of dosing. The safety profile of VR004 was generally similar to that of placebo, and AEs were mild or moderate in severity. The incidence of treatment-related AEs was dose dependent. Few patients (4%) withdrew because of treatment-related AEs, and the majority of these withdrawals occurred on the day of the stringent orthostatic challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The VR004 system administers low apomorphine doses that are well tolerated without compromising efficacy. This route of administration ensures a rapid onset of action and reproducible efficacy and safety profiles. Inhaled apomorphine is therefore a potential first-line treatment for ED.