A trust approach for sharing research reagents.

The core feature of trusts-holding property for the benefit of others-is well suited to constructing a research community that treats reagents as public goods.

Are biosimilars patentable?

INTRODUCTION: This paper explores whether, and under what circumstances, a biosimilar approved in the United States under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (hereafter 'BPCIA') can be patented. The possibility that a biosimilar product could have meaningful patent protection arises from specific requirements for biosimilarity under the BPCIA, which account for the fact that manufacturing processes of biologics are inherently imprecise. The requirements for biosimilar approval may provide sufficient leeway to a biosimilar applicant to patent structural or formulation differences that provide non-clinical but business-relevant advantages over the reference molecule, such as improved shelf-life or ease of manufacture, without compromising clinical biosimilarity. AREAS COVERED: Examination of the BPCIA and related Acts, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance papers, case law, patent database searching, and relevant scholarly articles. EXPERT OPINION: Legislative and regulatory requirements for the approval of a biosimilar under the BPCIA are focused on clinical results and allow a degree of leeway for differences to exist between a biosimilar's structure and non-clinical components and those of the biosimilar's reference molecule. This leeway can be exploited to provide the biosimilar with potentially patentable business-relevant advantages over its reference product while maintaining clinical biosimilarity to the reference product.

Exposure to paclitaxel or vinblastine down-regulates CD11a and CD54 expression by P815 mastocytoma cells and renders the tumor cells resistant to killing by nonspecific cytotoxic T lymphocytes induced with anti-CD3 antibody.

Paclitaxel and vinblastine are drugs with anti-microtubule activity that are commonly used in the treatment of numerous types of cancer. In this study, we investigated the effect of prior exposure to submaximal cytotoxic concentrations (EC(25) and EC(50)) of paclitaxel or vinblastine on the subsequent susceptibility of surviving P815 murine mastocytoma cells to cytolysis by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-unrestricted mouse cytotoxic T lymphocytes that had been induced with anti-CD3 antibody. P815 cells that had survived culture for 24 h in the presence of paclitaxel (5 or 50 micro g/ml) or vinblastine (1.5 or 15 micro g/ml) were rendered resistant to anti-CD3-activated killer-T (AK-T) cell-mediated cytolysis in a standard (51)Cr-release assay. Resistance to killing was associated with a reduced ability of AK-T cells to form conjugates with drug-treated P815 target cells, suggesting a possible effect on adhesion molecules. Flow cytometric analysis of paclitaxel- or vinblastine-treated P815 cells revealed reduced cell-surface expression of the adhesion molecules LFA-1 (CD11a /CD18) and ICAM-1 (CD54). Similar results were obtained following paclitaxel or vinblastine treatment of Yac-1 lymphoma cells. RT-PCR analysis revealed reduced levels of mRNAs coding for CD11a and CD54 in paclitaxel- or vinblastine-pretreated P815 cells. Collectively, these data lead us to conclude that paclitaxel and vinblastine render P815 mastocytoma cells resistant to T cell-mediated cytotoxicity by interfering with CD11a and CD54 expression by the tumor cells. A similar effect by these drugs on tumor cells and/or leukocytes in cancer patients might compromise tumor-specific cell-mediated immune responses.

Chemosensitization of T-47D breast carcinoma cells to TRAIL and Fas receptor-induced killing.

BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapeutic agents are known to sensitize some tumour types to killing through cell surface death receptors for Fas ligand and tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), chemosensitization of breast carcinoma cells has not yet been explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mitochondrial thiazole tetrazolium assays were used to measure changes in MCF-7 and T-47D breast carcinoma cell viability. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to determine Fas and TRAIL receptor mRNA expression. RESULTS: Treatment with suboptimal concentrations of etoposide or doxorubicin rendered T-47D cells sensitive to anti-Fas antibody or TRAIL, consistent with Fas and TRAIL-R1 mRNA expression by T-47D cells following drug treatment. In contrast, neither drug sensitized MCF-7 cells to TRAIL- or anti-Fas antibody, most likely due to diminished Fas and TRAIL-R1 expression following drug treatment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that some breast carcinomas may respond favorably to a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can promote placement of tRNA primer onto viral RNA and suppress later DNA polymerization in HIV-1 reverse transcription.

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 Tat has been proposed to play a role in the regulation of reverse transcription. We previously demonstrated that wild-type Tat can augment viral infectivity by suppressing the reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction at late stages of the viral life cycle in order to prevent the premature synthesis of potentially deleterious viral DNA products. Here we have performed a detailed analysis of the cell-free reverse transcription reaction to elucidate the mechanism(s) whereby Tat can affect this process. Our results show that Tat can suppress nonspecific DNA elongation while moderately affecting the specific initiation stage of reverse transcription. In addition, Tat has an RNA-annealing activity and can promote the placement of tRNA onto viral RNA. This points to a functional homology between Tat and the viral nucleocapsid (NC) protein that is known to be directly involved in this process. Experiments using a series of mutant Tat proteins revealed that the cysteine-rich and core domains of Tat are responsible for suppression of DNA elongation, while each of the cysteine-rich, core, and basic domains, as well as a glutamine-rich region in the C-terminal domain, are important for the placement of tRNA onto the viral RNA genome. These results suggest that Tat can play at least two different roles in the RT reaction, i.e., suppression of DNA polymerization and placement of tRNA onto viral RNA. We believe that the first of these activities of Tat may contribute to the overall efficiency of reverse transcription of the viral genome during a new round of infection as well as to enhanced production of infectious viral particles. We hypothesize that the second activity, illustrating functional homology between Tat and NC, suggests a potential role for NC in the displacement of Tat during viral maturation.