Quantification of Ankle Dorsiflexion in Ponseti-managed Unilateral Clubfoot Patients During Early Childhood.

BACKGROUND: Following the initial correction of a clubfoot using the Ponseti method, diminished passive ankle dorsiflexion may be observed over time, which could represent a possible relapsed deformity. Alternatively, the change may be attributable to patient age or other variables. Our purpose was to quantify passive ankle dorsiflexion in the involved and contralateral unaffected limbs of Ponseti-managed unilateral clubfoot patients, and to determine what patient-related variables influence this finding. METHODS: In total, 132 unilateral clubfoot patients were studied. Passive ankle dorsiflexion was measured in both limbs at each visit. Data were excluded from visits in which patients showed clear evidence of a relapse. Mean ankle dorsiflexion for clubfeet and contralateral unaffected limbs were reported for annual age intervals and compared using paired t tests. A general linear model was established to assess the effects of age, severity, sex, and side on ankle dorsiflexion. RESULTS: Mean ankle dorsiflexion for unaffected limbs declined with age, measuring 53±6 degrees between 0 and 1 year of age and decreasing to 39±7 degrees by 4 to 5 years of age. Similarly, mean ankle dorsiflexion in treated clubfeet declined with age, measuring 44±7 degrees between 0 and 1 year and 29±7 degrees between 4 and 5 years. Overall, the difference between limbs in these patients averaged ~10 degrees for every age interval through 9 years (P<0.001). Ankle dorsiflexion of clubfeet in 95% of patients aged 0 to 2 years was at least 20 degrees, and in 95% of patients aged 3 to 5 years this was at least 15 degrees. Patient age (P<0.001) and severity of deformity (P<0.001) were found to be the only significant factors affecting ankle dorsiflexion in the affected limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle dorsiflexion in the Ponseti-treated clubfeet was influenced by age of the patient and the initial severity of the affected limb. Furthermore, our data suggest that, in patients who showed no relapse, a minimum of 20 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion in the corrected clubfoot is maintained through age 3 years and a minimum of 15 degrees is maintained through age 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-this is a retrospective case series.

Sixty Years On: Ponseti Method for Clubfoot Treatment Produces High Satisfaction Despite Inherent Tendency to Relapse.

BACKGROUND: Developed at the University of Iowa in 1950, the Ponseti method to manage idiopathic clubfoot deformity was slow to gain wide acceptance until the mid-1990s. There is a paucity of intermediate and long-term outcome studies involving this technique, with nearly all such studies coming from a single institution. The purpose of this study is to report the contemporary outcome of patients with clubfoot deformity whose feet were managed with the Ponseti method and who were followed to ≥5 years old, to provide outcome expectations for parents and for clinicians managing patients with idiopathic clubfoot. METHODS: Families of infants seen in our clinic diagnosed with idiopathic clubfoot since July 2006 were prospectively invited to participate in our institutional review board-approved study. Patients who received no prior outside treatment and had a minimum follow-up to the age of 5 years were included. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. To provide an array of outcome measures, both the Dallas outcome criteria and the Roye disease-specific instrument (DSI) were used. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean length of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 81.1 ± 17.1 months. Initial correction was achieved in all feet. Thirty-seven percent of families reported that they were adherent with the bracing protocol; 68% of patients had ≥1 relapse, and 38% underwent a tendon transfer. With the Dallas criteria, 62% had outcomes rated as good, 38% had outcomes rated as fair, and no patient had an outcome rated as poor. With the Roye DSI, most families were generally very satisfied with the function and appearance of the feet. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory results at intermediate follow-up were achieved using the Ponseti method. However, despite a better understanding of the Ponseti method and the importance of longer post-corrective brace use, the need for anterior tibial tendon transfer remains an important adjunct to the Ponseti method. Brace adherence also continues to be a critical clinical issue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Timing and Relevance of Relapsed Deformity in Patients With Idiopathic Clubfoot.

BACKGROUND: The timing and relevance of relapsed deformity after correction of idiopathic clubfoot have not been well documented. METHODS: All patients with idiopathic clubfoot seen at the authors' institution during the study period who were followed for ≥2 years (range, 2.0 to 9.8 years) were included (N = 191). Survival analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The median age at first relapse was 20 months. The probability of relapse remained approximately 30% at age 2 years and increased to 45% by 4 years and 52% by 6 years. Parent-reported adherence with bracing reduced the odds of a relapse by 15 times (P < 0.01). After an initial relapse, adherence with bracing was successful in avoiding a subsequent relapse in 68% of patients. Feet graded as very severe on the Diméglio scale were 5.75 times more likely to relapse than those graded severe and were 7.27 times more likely than those graded as moderate. DISCUSSION: Patients whose parents reported nonadherence with bracing and patients with very severe deformities were most likely to relapse. After an initial relapse, regaining correction of the foot and resuming bracing were beneficial to avoid further relapses. These findings can be useful to clinicians in advising families regarding the prognosis of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a relapse affects the subsequent management and outcome of clubfoot deformity. The importance of bracing should be reinforced to parents. Bracing until at least age 4 years may be beneficial. For patients whose families are especially resistant to brace use and for older patients who experience a second relapse, regaining correction of the deformity via cast treatment followed by an Achilles lengthening procedure and/or tendon transfer may be the best alternative.

The Objective Measurement of Brace-Use Adherence in the Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot.

BACKGROUND: A successful outcome for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot is believed to require adequate adherence to brace use. Previous studies have relied on parental reporting of brace application. We used temperature sensors to determine the adherence to the bracing protocol, the accuracy of parent-reported use, and differences in adherence between patients who experienced relapse of deformity and those who did not. METHODS: Using wireless sensors attached to brace sandals, we monitored brace wear over a 3-month period in this cross-sectional study involving 48 patients in 4 age-based groups: 6 to 12 months (Group 1), >1 to 2 years (Group 2), >2 to 3 years (Group 3), and >3 to 4 years (Group 4). Parents were blinded to the purpose of the sensors. The mean number of hours of daily brace use as measured by the sensors was compared with the physician-recommended hours and parent-reported hours of brace use. RESULTS: Sensors were retrieved from 44 of 48 patients. Overall, the median brace use recorded by the sensors was 62% (range, 5% to 125%) of that recommended by the physician, and 77% (range, 6% to 213%) of that reported by the parents. For Groups 1 to 3, the difference between the physician-recommended and measured number of hours of daily brace use was significant (p ≤ 0.002), and the difference between the parent-reported and measured number of hours of daily brace use was also significant (p ≤ 0.013). Eight (18%) of the 44 patients who completed the study experienced relapse during the period of monitoring; most importantly, the mean number of hours of brace wear for these patients, 5 hours per day (median, 4; and standard deviation [SD], 3 hours per day) was significantly lower than the 8 hours per day for those who did not experience relapse (median, 9; and SD, 5 hours per day) (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The present study objectively quantified the number of daily hours of post-corrective brace wear for patients with clubfoot in varying age groups and provides an estimate of the number of hours required to avoid relapse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.