Smaller aortic dimensions do not fully account for the greater pulse pressure in elderly female hypertensives.

This study examined the importance of aortic dimensions in determining pulse pressure in elderly hypertensives participating in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study, including a substantial number not previously receiving blood pressure lowering medication. Aortic dimensions were determined by ultrasound at the transverse arch and at the insertion of the aortic valve. Unadjusted data showed negative (P<0.001) correlations between central (carotid) and (brachial) peripheral pulse pressure and both arch (-0.200, -0.181) and outflow tract (-0.238, -0.238) diameters. Correlations were similar in those previously treated with blood pressure lowering medication and in the treatment naïve. Central pulse pressure (84+/-26 versus 75+/-28 mm Hg, P<0.001) was higher and aortic dimensions (transverse arch 2.56+/-0.31 versus 2.88+/-0.35 mm, P<0.001) smaller in women than men. Women had greater aortic stiffness (beta index 29.4+/-36.1 versus 22.1+/-21.3, P<0.03). Other bivariate correlates of central pulse pressure were age, mean arterial pressure, height, heart rate, augmentation index, aortic stiffness (all P<0.001), and weight (P=0.027). In multivariate analyses gender remained a predictor of central pulse pressure (P<0.001) even with inclusion of aortic dimensions (P=0.013) height and weight. Other significant terms were age, heart rate, mean blood pressure, and aortic stiffness (all P<0.001). These findings demonstrate an independent inverse relation between aortic size and pulse pressure in older hypertensive subjects. Differences in aortic dimensions and stiffness between genders do not fully account for the observed blood pressure differences, suggesting that a contributory factor to gender differences in pulse pressure is an increased age-related mismatch in ventricular function and aortic stiffness in women compared with men.

Similar effects of treatment on central and brachial blood pressures in older hypertensive subjects in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial.

The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial reported better prognosis for hypertensive subjects randomly assigned to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) compared with a diuretic-based regimen despite no difference in brachial blood pressure control. A possible explanation is that there was a difference in central aortic pressures despite similar brachial pressure reductions. We examined this hypothesis in a subset of the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial cohort evaluated both before and after 4 years of treatment. The average age of the 479 subjects was 71.6+/-4.7 years (mean+/-SD), and 56% were women. Brachial systolic and pulse pressures after treatment were 145+/-1 (mean+/-SEM), 143+/-1, 72+/-1, and 70+/-1 mm Hg for diuretic and ACE-I groups, respectively. The respective changes from pretreatment values were -17+/-2, -16+/-2, -9+/-1, and -7+/-1 mm Hg. None of the differences between diuretic and ACE-I groups were significant. Central arterial pressure waveforms were acquired from carotid tonometry and calibrated from brachial pressures. Central systolic and pulse pressures posttreatment were 144+/-2, 144+/-2, 71+/-2, and 72+/-2 mm Hg for diuretic and ACE-I groups, respectively. The respective changes from pretreatment values were -15+/-2, -17+/-2, -6+/-2, and -8+/-2 mm Hg. None of the differences between diuretic and ACE-I groups were significant. The similarity of central and brachial pressures in this cohort of older hypertensive subjects is most likely because of the influences of age and hypertension in increasing arterial stiffness. There is no evidence that the better prognosis for patients randomly assigned to ACE-I in Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial resulted from a disproportionate lowering of central blood pressure.

Brachial blood pressure but not carotid arterial waveforms predict cardiovascular events in elderly female hypertensives.

Central arterial waveforms and related indices of large artery properties can be determined with relative ease. This would make them an attractive adjunct in the risk stratification for cardiovascular disease. Although they have been associated with some classical risk factors and the presence of coronary disease, their prospective value in predicting cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. The present study determined the relative predictive value for cardiovascular disease-free survival of large artery properties as compared with noninvasive brachial blood pressure alone in a population of elderly female hypertensive subjects. We measured systemic arterial compliance, central systolic pressure, and carotid augmentation index in a subset of female participants in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study (untreated blood pressure 169/88+/-12/8 mm Hg). There were a total of 53 defined events during a median of 4.1 years of follow-up in 484 women with complete measurements. Although baseline blood pressures at the brachial artery predicted cardiovascular disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1 for pulse pressure > or =81 versus <81 mm Hg; P=0.01), no such relation was found for carotid augmentation index (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.44; P value not significant) or systemic arterial compliance (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.16; P value not significant). Blood pressure, but not noninvasively measured central arterial waveforms, predict outcome in the older female hypertensive patient. Thus, blood pressure measurement alone is superior to measurement of arterial waveforms in predicting outcome in this group.

Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials.

The characterization of blood pressure in treatment trials assessing the benefits of blood pressure lowering regimens is a critical factor for the appropriate interpretation of study results. With numerous operators involved in the measurement of blood pressure in many thousands of patients being screened for entry into clinical trials, it is essential that operators follow pre-defined measurement protocols involving multiple measurements and standardized techniques. Blood pressure measurement protocols have been developed by international societies and emphasize the importance of appropriate choice of cuff size, identification of Korotkoff sounds, and digit preference. Training of operators and auditing of blood pressure measurement may assist in reducing the operator-related errors in measurement. This paper describes the quality control activities adopted for the screening stage of the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study (ANBP2). ANBP2 is cardiovascular outcome trial of the treatment of hypertension in the elderly that was conducted entirely in general practices in Australia. A total of 54 288 subjects were screened; 3688 previously untreated subjects were identified as having blood pressure >140/90 mmHg at the initial screening visit, 898 (24%) were not eligible for study entry after two further visits due to the elevated reading not being sustained. For both systolic and diastolic blood pressure recording, observed digit preference fell within 7 percentage points of the expected frequency. Protocol adherence, in terms of the required minimum blood pressure difference between the last two successive recordings, was 99.8%. These data suggest that adherence to blood pressure recording protocols and elimination of digit preferences can be achieved through appropriate training programs and quality control activities in large multi-centre community-based trials in general practice. Repeated blood pressure measurement prior to initial diagnosis and study entry is essential to appropriately characterize hypertension in these elderly patients.

Predictors of failure to initiate randomized treatment in a large trial of antihypertensive drug therapy in the aged.

BACKGROUND: The identification of factors that contribute to noncompliance with trial drug initiation where virtually complete compliance might be expected, may help identify patients whose management is least likely to comply with clinical guidelines and study protocols. METHODS: Examination of cross-sectional and longitudinal data arising from the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study. Prevalence rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from log-binomial models were used to assess associations between subject characteristics and whether the randomized drug was prescribed at trial randomization. The study population consisted of 6083 hypertensive Australians aged 65 to 84 years. RESULTS: After adjusting for each variable in a multivariate model the following were significant predictors of failure to prescribe RR (95% CI): not previously prescribed antihypertensive drugs 2.89 (2.52-3.32); lower systolic blood pressure (BP) 1.51 (1.59-1.43) or diastolic BP 1.18 (1.22-1.13); younger age 80 to 84 v 65 to 79 years 0.75 (0.59-0.95); total cholesterol >or=6.6 v

Elevated dietary sodium intake exacerbates myocardial hypertrophy associated with cardiac-specific overproduction of angiotensin II.

INTRODUCTION/HYPOTHESIS: Cardiac hypertrophy is an independent risk factor predictive of cardiovascular disease and is significantly associated with morbidity and mortality. The mechanism by which angiotensin II (Ang II) and dietary sodium exert additive effects on the development of cardiac hypertrophy is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that, where there is a genetic predisposition to Ang II-dependent hypertrophy, there is also an increased susceptibility to sodium-induced hypertrophy mediated by AT1-receptor expression. METHODS: Diets of low sodium (LS, 0.3% w:w) and high sodium (HS, 4.0% w:w) content were fed to adult (age 25 weeks) control wild-type mice (WT) and to transgenic mice exhibiting cardiac-specific overexpression of angiotensinogen (TG). At the conclusion of a 40-day treatment period, cardiac tissue weights were compared and the relative expression levels of Ang II receptor subtypes (AT(1A) and AT(2)) were evaluated using RT-PCR. RESULTS: WT and TG mice fed HS and LS diets maintained comparable weight gains during the treatment period. The normalised heart weights of TG mice were elevated compared to WT, and the extent of the increase was greater for mice maintained on the HS diet treatments (WT 12% vs TG 41% increase in cardiac weight index). While a similar pattern of growth was observed for ventricular tissues, the atrial weight parameters demonstrated an additional significant effect of dietary sodium on tissue weight, independent of animal generic type. No differences in the relative (GAPDH normalised) expression levels of AT(1A)- and AT(2)-receptor mRNA were observed between diet or animal generic groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, where there is a pre-existing genetic condition of Ang II-dependent cardiac hypertrophy, the pro-growth effect of elevated dietary sodium is selectively augmented. In TG and WT mice, this effect was evident with a relatively short dietary treatment intervention (40 days). Evaluation of the levels of Ang II receptor mRNA further demonstrated that this differential growth response was not associated with an altered relative expression of either AT(1A)- or AT(2)-receptor subtypes. The cellular mechanistic bases for this specific ANG II-dietary sodium interaction remain to be elucidated.

Combined renin-angiotensin system blockade and dietary sodium restriction impairs cardiomyocyte contractility.

INTRODUCTION: Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT(1)) antagonist treatment with reduced dietary sodium intake produces suppression of cardiac growth and regression of cardiac hypertrophy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cardiac growth suppression by combined RAS blockade under conditions of dietary sodium restriction is associated with cardiomyocyte atrophy and contractile dysfunction and whether this intervention modifies cardiomyocyte inotropic responsiveness to angiotensin II (Ang II). METHODS: Rats were fed a high (4% w/w) or low (0.2% w/w) NaCl diet for six days. Both groups were then given a combined intraperitoneal injection of perindopril (6 mg/kg/day) and losartan (10 mg/kg/day) with maintained dietary treatment for another seven days. At the end of the treatment period, animals were anaesthetised and their hearts were removed and weighed. Left ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated by enzymatic dissociation and cell dimensions were evaluated. A line scan camera and digital imaging technique were used to assess cardiomyocyte contraction and inotropic responses to exogenous Ang II (10 to 10(-8) M). RESULTS: Dietary treatment alone had no effect on body growth, whereas combined RAS blockade suppressed somatic growth in the low sodium (LS) group, compared with the high sodium (HS) group. This growth suppression in the LS group was also evident in the heart at the organ and cellular level. Studies of cardiomyocyte contraction showed that myocytes from the LS group exhibited contractile instability and depression of contractile performance. Compared with the HS group, myocytes from the LS group showed a significant reduction in maximum cell shortening (6.40+0.17 vs. 7.32+0.16% resting length, p<0.05), and maximum rate of shortening (3.85+0.14 vs. 4.29+0.11 cell length/ms, p<0.05). Myocytes of the HS group exhibited negative inotropic responses to Ang II at all concentrations tested, with a significant reduction in maximum cell shortening by 11 16% after 12 minutes peptide exposure (p<0.05 vs. non-treated control). In comparison, Ang II elicited both positive and negative responses in myocytes from the LS group, with a predominant negative inotropic effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that combined RAS blockade treatment under restricted sodium intake conditions can impair cardiomyocyte contractile function in association with cardiomyocyte growth suppression. Chronic RAS blockade qualitatively alters the intrinsic inotropic status and responsiveness of ventricular cardiomyocytes, and this shift is further modulated by dietary sodium intake conditions.

Decreasing dietary sodium while following a self-selected potassium-rich diet reduces blood pressure.

Reducing dietary sodium reduces blood pressure (BP), a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but few studies have specifically examined the effect on BP of altering dietary sodium in the context of a high potassium diet. This randomized, crossover study compared BP values in volunteer subjects self-selecting food intake and consuming low levels of sodium (Na+; 50 mmol/d) with those consuming high levels of sodium (> or =120 mmol/d), in the context of a diet rich in potassium (K+). Sodium supplementation (NaSp) produced the difference in Na+ intake. Subjects (n = 108; 64 women, 44 men; 16 on antihypertensive therapy) had a mean age of 47.0 +/- 10.1 y. Subjects were given dietary advice to achieve a low sodium (LS) diet with high potassium intake (50 mmol Na+/d, >80 mmol K+/d) and were allocated to NaSp (120 mmol Na+/d) or placebo treatment for 4 wk before crossover. The LS diet decreased urinary Na+ from baseline, 138.7 +/- 5.3 mmol/d to 57.8 +/- 3.8 mmol/d (P < 0.001). The NaSp treatment returned urinary Na+ to baseline levels 142.4 +/- 3.7 mmol/d. Urinary K+ increased from baseline, 78.6 +/- 2.3 to 86.6 +/- 2.1 mmol/d with the LS diet and to 87.1 +/- 2.1 mmol/d with NaSp treatment (P < 0.001). The LS diet reduced home systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 2.5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (P = 0.004), compared with the NaSp treatment. Hence, reducing Na+ intake from 140 to 60 mmol/d significantly decreased home SBP in subjects dwelling in a community setting who consumed a self-selected K+-rich diet, and this dietary modification could assist in lowering blood pressure in the general population.

A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypertension with diuretics, beta-blockers, or both leads to improved outcomes. It has been postulated that agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system confer benefit beyond the reduction of blood pressure alone. We compared the outcomes in older subjects with hypertension who were treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with the outcomes in those treated with diuretic agents. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded assessment of end points in 6083 subjects with hypertension who were 65 to 84 years of age and received health care at 1594 family practices. Subjects were followed for a median of 4.1 years, and the total numbers of cardiovascular events in the two treatment groups were compared with the use of multivariate proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: At base line, the treatment groups were well matched in terms of age, sex, and blood pressure. By the end of the study, blood pressure had decreased to a similar extent in both groups (a decrease of 26/12 mm Hg). There were 695 cardiovascular events or deaths from any cause in the ACE-inhibitor group (56.1 per 1000 patient-years) and 736 cardiovascular events or deaths from any cause in the diuretic group (59.8 per 1000 patient-years; the hazard ratio for a cardiovascular event or death with ACE-inhibitor treatment was 0.89 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.00]; P=0.05). Among male subjects, the hazard ratio was 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.97; P=0.02); among female subjects, the hazard ratio was 1.00 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.21; P=0.98); the P value for the interaction between sex and treatment-group assignment was 0.15. The rates of nonfatal cardiovascular events and myocardial infarctions decreased with ACE-inhibitor treatment, whereas a similar number of strokes occurred in each group (although there were more fatal strokes in the ACE-inhibitor group). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of antihypertensive treatment involving ACE inhibitors in older subjects, particularly men, appears to lead to better outcomes than treatment with diuretic agents, despite similar reductions of blood pressure.

Different drug classes have variable effects on blood pressure depending on the time of day.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) is controlled by a variety of systems, the activities of which vary throughout the day. As drugs are developed that selectively block these systems, the fall in BP may not be consistent over 24 h. METHODS: A total of 24 patients (aged >65 years) with systolic BP (SBP; >150 mm Hg) that had not been treated entered a substudy of a larger study performed in 74 patients. In a double blind, crossover study with a balanced design, they received placebo, atenolol 50 mg, perindopril 8 mg, felodipine 10 mg, or hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg. The study periods were 2 months. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at the end of each period, and was divided into awake periods (9:00 AM to 10:00 PM), sleep periods (12:00 AM to 6:00 AM), and morning periods (6:00 AM to 9:00 AM). Medication was taken at 9:00 AM. RESULTS: The four drug classes lowered 24-h mean SBP (P <.05), but the fall with atenolol was less than with the other drugs. The fall in awake BP with perindopril was less than with felodipine or hydrochlorothiazide. Atenolol caused no significant fall in sleep or morning SBP, and the falls with the other three drugs were significant and were greater than the fall with atenolol. The fall in sleep BP with perindopril was greater than with the other drug classes. The awake-sleep difference in SBP increased with perindopril, stayed the same with felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide, and was reduced by atenolol. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the response to the different drug classes differed. The response to drugs that work relatively nonspecifically (diuretics, calcium blockers) was relatively consistent over 24 h. The response to beta blockers and to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors reflected the activity of control systems. This finding supports the concept of multiple drug therapy that may need to be tailored to the time of day.

Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in the SHR by combined renin-angiotensin system blockade and dietary sodium restriction.

Altered operation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and dietary sodium intake have been identified as independent risk factors for cardiac hypertrophy. The way in which sodium intake and the operation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system interact in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy is poorly understood. The aims of this study were to investigate the cardiac effects of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), using co-treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with different sodium intakes. Our experiments with SHR show that, at high levels of sodium intake (4.0%), aggressive RAS blockade treatment with candesartan (3 mg/kg) and perindopril (6 mg/kg) does not result in regression of cardiac hypertrophy. In contrast, RAS blockade coupled with reduced sodium diet (0.2%) significantly regresses cardiac hypertrophy, impairs animal growth and is associated with elevated plasma renin and dramatically suppressed plasma angiotensinogen levels. Histological analyses indicate that the differential effect of reduced sodium on heart growth during RAS blockade is not associated with any change in myocardial interstitial collagen, but reflects modification of cellular geometry. Dimensional measurements of enzymatically-isolated ventricular myocytes show that, in the RAS blocked, reduced sodium group, myocyte length and width were decreased by about 16-19% compared with myocytes from the high sodium treatment group. Our findings highlight the importance of `titrating' sodium intake with combined RAS blockade in the clinical setting to optimise therapeutic benefit.