Configuration and localization of the nipple-areola complex in men.

The causes of bilateral absence of the nipple-areola complex in men are seldom congenital, but attributable rather to destruction as a result of trauma, or after mastectomy in female-to-male transsexuals and in male breast cancer, or after the correction of extreme bilateral gynecomastia. Such a bilateral loss becomes a major reconstructive challenge with respect to the configuration and localization of a new nipple-areola complex. Because there is very little information available in the literature, we carried out a cross-sectional study on the configuration and localization of the nipple-areola complex in men.A total of 100 healthy men aged 20 to 36 years were examined under standardized conditions. The first part of the study dealt with the configuration of the nipple-areola complex (dimensions, round or oval shape). The second part concentrated on the localization of the complex on the thoracic wall with respect to anatomic landmarks and in correlation to various parameters such as weight and height of the body, circumference of the thorax, length of sternum, and position in the intercostal space. Of the 100 subjects examined, 91 had oval and seven had a round nipple-areola complex. An asymmetry between the right and the left side was found in two cases. The mean ratio of the horizontal/vertical diameter of an oval nipple-areola complex was 27:20 mm and the mean diameter for a round nipple-areola complex was 23 mm. The center of the nipple-areola complex was in the fourth intercostal space in 75 percent and in the fifth intercostal space in 23 percent of the subjects. To localize the nipple-areola complex on the thoracic wall de novo, at least two reproducible measurements proved to be necessary, composed of a horizontal line (distance from the midsternal line to the nipple = A) and a vertical line (distance from the sternal notch to the intersection of line A, = B). The closest correlation for the horizontal distance A was given by the circumference of the thorax: A = 2.4 cm + [0.09 x circumference of thorax (cm)], (r = 0.68). The best correlation to calculate the vertical distance B was found using the distance A and the length of the sternum: B = 1.2 cm + [0.28 x length of sternum (cm)] + [0.1 x circumference of thorax (cm)], (R = 0.50). In cases of bilateral absence, we recommend creating an oval nipple-areola complex in men. The appropriate localization can be calculated by means of two simple equations derived from the circumference of the thorax and the length of the sternum.

Modifications in vertical scar breast reduction.

The use of vertical-scar breast reduction techniques is only slowly increasing, even though they have been advocated by Lassus and Lejour and are requested by patients. Possible reasons why surgeons are reluctant to use these techniques are that they are said to be more difficult to learn, they require considerable experience and intuition, and their applicability is confined to small breasts. Several surgeons have developed modifications, combining vertical-scar breast reduction techniques with details of the familiar inverted-T-scar technique. We present a procedure involving two further modifications of the vertical-scar breast reduction technique: first, a standardised, geometrical preoperative drawing from our superior-pedicle T technique, with the aim of establishing a reproducible method of reduction requiring no particular intuitive touch, and, second, the addition of a periareolar skin resection, to give the breast the desired round shape. Between September 1998 and December 1999 we used this technique in a prospective series of 52 patients. The median resection weight was 450 g. The maximal postoperative follow-up was 15 months. There were no acute postoperative complications necessitating reoperation. The late complication rate was within the expected range for such procedures (seven patients, 13.5%) and included vertical-scar widening, areolar distortion, residual wrinkles due to incomplete shrinkage of the undermined skin in the inferior pole and asymmetry of the breast. This procedure enables us to offer patients with moderate to marked hypertrophy a reproducible versatile vertical breast reduction technique. The technique is easy to teach and easy to learn, especially for those who are familiar with the superior pedicle inverted-T-scar technique.

Micrographic surgery ('slow Mohs') in cutaneous sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Micrographic surgery (MS) results in very low local recurrence rates in all sorts of skin tumours that grow by extensive subclinical infiltration. Therefore, MS should prove useful in the treatment of cutaneous sarcomas. OBJECTIVE: To treat cutaneous sarcoma with MS in order to minimize local recurrence rates. METHODS: We treated 5 cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and 5 cases of cutaneous sarcomas of different origin (atypical fibroxanthoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, malignant peripheral nerve tumour) with micrographic surgery using paraffin-embedded sections. In primary cutaneous sarcomas, tumour extensions were readily detected in HE sections. In recurrent tumours, special stains were needed to distinguish tumour extensions from scar tissue. RESULTS: All patients were treated successfully and have remained free of local recurrences as of yet. Solitary pulmonary metastasis occurred in 1 patient with high-grade malignant peripheral nerve tumour. CONCLUSION: MS is an excellent procedure to minimize local recurrence in cutaneous sarcomas. Cutaneous sarcomas with low metastatic potential can be cured with MS.

Silicone cuffs for peripheral nerve repair: experimental findings.

The effectiveness of silicone cuffing in peripheral nerve repairs was assessed in a comparative study in rats. The femoral nerve was dissected out and severed bilaterally. The nerve ends were brought together with four epineural sutures on one side, while only one epineural suture was used on the other side, placing a silicone cuff around the junction site. Initially, nerve regeneration appeared to be improved by the cuff, with electrophysiologic parameters and histologic studies 6 weeks after the procedure yielding better results for the tubulated nerves. Subsequently, however, conductivity was less in the tubulated nerves, and results were clearly inferior to sutured nerves at 4 months after the operation. The deterioration was due to nerve compression caused by the cuff, which prevented axons from penetrating into the distal nerve stump, and resulted in axon fragmentation in the compressed nerve segment. The risk of nerve compression makes the use of silicone cuffs of doubtful value.