Reconstruction of Perioral Defects After Mohs Micrographic Surgery or Excision: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Although many repair methods for postsurgical lip defects have been described, the literature lacks a comprehensive review of these methods. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of lip defect repair methods after Mohs surgery or excisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Terms related to perioral anatomy, Mohs surgery and excision, and reconstruction were used to search 8 databases. Articles were included if they reported postsurgical lip repair data for 4 or more patients, were in English, and were published from 2004 onward. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, followed by the full texts of the remaining articles. Data were then extracted including author specialties, study design, demographic, tumor, and defect information, surgical procedures, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were eligible, including a randomized trial, 25 case series, and 16 cohort studies. Most were written by dermatologic or plastic surgeons, and most studies were small, with an average subject number of 61. Very few studies used structured outcome measures. Many repair methods were described, the most common of which were linear closures and various flaps. CONCLUSION: Many repair methods for lip defects have been published, but overall, the quality of the available evidence is low.

Periocular Mohs Reconstruction by Lateral Canthotomy With Inferior Cantholysis: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Most eyelid defects after Mohs micrographic surgery are referred to oculoplastic surgery or plastic surgery for reconstruction, but growing evidence suggests the safety of such repairs performed by dermatologic surgeons is equivalent if not better. Lateral canthotomy with inferior cantholysis may be used by the dermatologic surgeon to reconstruct larger lower eyelid defects. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate lateral canthotomy with inferior cantholysis performed by the dermatologic surgeon can result in safe, functionally and cosmetically acceptable surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study of repairs performed by a single dermatologic surgeon between January 2013 and August 2019. Patient demographics, operative and follow-up notes were reviewed. Two cosmetic dermatologists assessed aesthetic results based on final follow-up photographs using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Eight cases were included in the analysis. Seventy-five percent of patients were men, with a mean age of 74.1 years old. All tumors were basal cell carcinoma; the mean defect size was 2.4 cm2. No serious complications or postoperative interventions occurred. The median cosmetic score was 85.6 ± 11.5. CONCLUSION: Dermatologic surgeons can safely perform repairs of lower eyelid defects with lateral canthotomy with inferior cantholysis, achieving satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Multifocal infantile hemangiomas associated with concomitant giant hepatic rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma.

We present a 9-day-old girl with multifocal cutaneous and hepatic infantile hemangiomas as well as a hepatic rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma. These two distinct vascular tumors have rarely been reported to co-occur. We additionally review the sonographic features that distinguish a hepatic congenital hemangioma from the hepatic infantile hemangioma.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery at Challenging Anatomical Sites.

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is often the treatment of choice for skin cancer removal as it maximizes normal tissue sparing and can be paired with a reconstructive approach that optimizes function and cosmesis. Many tumors on the eyelid, nose, ear, and genitals are particularly well suited for MMS but can be challenging for the dermatologic surgeon. OBJECTIVE: To review the complex anatomy, as well as the authors' approach to executing and interpreting Mohs layers, at each of these anatomical sites. METHODS: A review of the literature on MMS of the eyelid, nose, ear, and genitals was performed using the PubMed database and relevant search terms. CONCLUSION: These sites present potential pitfalls for tumor resection and reconstruction, but with the proper technique, the dermatologic surgeon can minimize tumor recurrence and MMS complications. Warning signs for potentially difficult tumor resection can signify when an interdisciplinary approach is warranted.