Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Circ J ; 84(4): 670-676, 2020 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32132310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infective endocarditis (HAIE) has become increasingly recognized worldwide because the underlying patient conditions are completely different from those of community-acquired infective endocarditis (CIE). However, data on HAIE in the Japanese population is lacking. We sought to clarify the patient characteristics and prognosis of HAIE in a Japanese population.Methods and Results:A retrospective study was conducted in 158 patients who were diagnosed with infective endocarditis, 53 of whom (33.5%) were classified as HAIE. Compared with patients with CIE, those with HAIE were older (median age 72 vs. 61 years; P=0.0002) and received surgical treatment less frequently (41.5% vs. 62.9%; P=0.01). Regarding causative microorganisms, staphylococci,including methicillin-resistant pathogens, were more common in patients with HAIE (32.1% vs. 14.3%; P=0.01). Patients with HAIE had higher in-hospital mortality (32.1% vs. 4.8%; P<0.0001) and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed worse prognosis for patients with HAIE than CIE (P<0.0001, log-rank test). On multivariate Cox analysis, HAIE (hazard ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval 1.49-7.14), age ≥60 years, surgical treatment, stroke, and heart failure were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HAIE has different clinical characteristics and causative microorganisms, as well as worse prognosis, than CIE. Preventive strategies, and the prompt and appropriate identification of HAIE may improve the outcome of infective endocarditis.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Cross Infection , Endocarditis , Tertiary Care Centers , Adult , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnostic imaging , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/diagnostic imaging , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/therapy , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis/microbiology , Endocarditis/mortality , Endocarditis/therapy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
2.
J Cardiol ; 69(1): 389-393, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although a cardioprotective effect of estrogen has been suggested by experimental studies, clinical data on the influence of estrogen on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function are sparse. The LV untwisting rate obtained by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is correlated with the time constant of LV pressure decay (tau), and this correlation is independent of left atrial pressure. Therefore, we used conventional Doppler echocardiography and 2D-STE to investigate changes in LV diastolic function during a single menstrual cycle in premenopausal women. METHODS: Twenty healthy premenopausal woman (mean age, 28.1±2.7 years) were enrolled. Clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained during the follicular phase (F-phase) and luteal phase (L-phase) of a single menstrual cycle. We compared the clinical and echocardiographic data, and estrogen levels between the two phases. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in LV diastolic parameters derived from Doppler echocardiography (E/A, p=0.295; E/e', p=0.449, DcT, p=0.178) or 2D-STE (peak untwisting rate, p=0.892; time-to-peak untwisting, p=0.951) between the two phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there was a significant decrease in estrogen levels between the F- and L-phases (177±119pg/ml vs. 35±12pg/ml, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: LV diastolic function in healthy premenopausal women did not significantly change during the menstrual cycle. Estrogen does not appear to have a significant acute effect on LV diastolic function in premenopausal woman.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography/methods , Estrogens/physiology , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Premenopause/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Adult , Diastole , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans
3.
J Cardiol ; 68(4): 324-8, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26603322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The development of clinical symptoms is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Thus, early diagnosis of AS is clinically important. However, there are few data on symptom status or the severity of AS when patients are first diagnosed, or on how AS is detected in routine practice. We aimed to investigate when and how AS patients are first diagnosed in our hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 198 AS patients diagnosed from 1989 to 2009, and identified their symptoms and AS severity at the time of the first diagnosis. We also assessed the reasons why they came to the hospital based on their medical records. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients, 82 (41.6%) had voluntarily visited or been referred to our hospital after developing clinical symptoms (Symptomatic group). The remaining 116 patients (58.4%) had been asymptomatic, and cardiovascular disease was suspected during an annual or occasional health checkup (Asymptomatic group). The initial findings in the Asymptomatic group that led to the diagnosis of AS were: a systolic murmur on auscultation (62%), abnormal electrocardiography (27%), or abnormal echocardiography (11%). The Symptomatic group had significantly greater AS severity and an increased left ventricular mass index, and experienced more cardiac events (valve replacement or cardiac death) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: About 40% of the AS patients in this study were not diagnosed until they developed clinical symptoms, suggesting that many other patients in the community might have a latent risk of cardiovascular events. Auscultation plays an important role in the early diagnosis of AS.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aged , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Asymptomatic Diseases , Early Diagnosis , Echocardiography, Doppler , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Auscultation , Heart Murmurs/diagnosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/etiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
4.
Circ J ; 80(2): 519-25, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26701353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because the covariates of cardiovascular events in unoperated patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) have not been adequately evaluated, we aimed to identify them. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 230 patients with asymptomatic severe AS were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on aortic valve replacement (AVR) after enrollment: a non-AVR group (n=112), and an AVR group (n=118). The primary clinical endpoint was cardiovascular events, which were defined as cardiovascular death or hospitalization. Coronary artery disease [hazard ratio (HR): 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.585-8.245, P<0.01] and high valvulo-arterial impedance (HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.261-7.532, P<0.05) were identified as independent covariates of cardiovascular events in the non-AVR group. The relative risk of cardiovascular events rose with an increase in the number of risk factors (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In unoperated patients with asymptomatic AS, the presence of coronary artery disease and increased global left ventricular afterload may be associated with a poor prognosis.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Ventricles , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...