Item Banks for Measuring the Effect of Blood Pressure Dysregulation on Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the development and calibration of the new Blood Pressure Dysregulation Measurement System (BPD-MS) item banks that assess the effect of BPD on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the daily activities of Veterans and non-Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Two Veteran Affairs medical centers and a SCI model system site. PARTICIPANTS: 454 respondents with SCI (n=262 American Veterans and n=192 non-Veterans; N=454). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BPD-MS item banks. RESULTS: BPD item pools were developed and refined using literature reviews, qualitative data from focus groups, and cognitive debriefing of persons with SCI and professional caregivers. The item banks then underwent expert review, reading level assessment, and translatability review prior to field testing. The items pools consisted of 180 unique questions (items). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item response theory modeling, and differential item function investigations resulted in item banks that included a total of 150 items: 75 describing the effect of autonomic dysreflexia on HRQOL, 55 describing the effect of low blood pressure (LBP) on HRQOL, and 20 describing the effect of LBP on daily activities. In addition, 10-item short forms were constructed based on item response theory-derived item information values and the clinical relevance of item content. CONCLUSIONS: The new BPD-MS item banks and corresponding 10-item short forms were developed using established rigorous measurement development standards, which represents the first BPD-specific patient-reported outcomes measurement system unique for use in the SCI population.

The design of a randomized control trial of exoskeletal-assisted walking in the home and community on quality of life in persons with chronic spinal cord injury.

There are more than 300,000 estimated cases of spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States, and approximately 27,000 of these are Veterans. Immobilization from SCI results in adverse secondary medical conditions and reduced quality of life. Veterans with SCI who have completed rehabilitation after injury and are unable to ambulate receive a wheelchair as standard of care. Powered exoskeletons are a technology that offers an alternative form of limited mobility by enabling over-ground walking through an external framework for support and computer-controlled motorized hip and knee joints. Few studies have reported the safety and efficacy for use of these devices in the home and community environments, and none evaluated their impact on patient-centered outcomes through a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Absence of reported RCTs for powered exoskeletons may be due to a range of challenges, including designing, statistically powering, and conducting such a trial within an appropriate experimental framework. An RCT for the study of exoskeletal-assisted walking in the home and community environments also requires the need to address key factors such as: avoiding selection bias, participant recruitment and retention, training, and safety concerns, particularly in the home environment. These points are described here in the context of a national, multisite Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program-sponsored trial. The rationale and methods for the study design were focused on providing a template for future studies that use powered exoskeletons or other strategies for walking and mobility in people with immobilization due to SCI.

Cognition may be related to arterial pulsatility index in HD patients.

AIMS: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a heavy burden of subclinical cerebrovascular disease and cognitive changes consistent with a vascular etiology. Pulsatility index is associated with microangiopathy of cerebral blood vessels and an increased risk of cerebral infarction. The proposed study was to determine common carotid artery pulsatility index (CCAPI) and its relation to cognition in well-dialyzed HD patients with no history of stroke or dementia and matched controls. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study of CCAPI and cognition in 37 hemodialysis outpatients and 18 matched controls with normal kidney function. Non-parametric analyses were used to compare variables between groups. Multiple regression and ANOVA models were used to adjust for risk factor differences. RESULTS: Controls had a lower CCAPI than the HD group (1.7 ± 0.3 vs. 2.1 ± 0.4 cm/s, p = 0.006). HD patients scored significantly lower on all cognitive domains. Attention correlated with CCAPI in HD patients, independent of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and years on HD (r2 = -0.36, p = 0.01). CCAPI correlated with years on HD, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. (r2 = 0.26, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In well-dialyzed hemodialysis patients with no history of stroke or dementia, CCAPI may correlate with cognitive function and represent a marker for underlying cerebral microvascular disease.

Impact of blood pressure dysregulation on health-related quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: development of a conceptual model.

OBJECTIVES: To identify medically relevant aspects of blood pressure dysregulation (BPD) related to quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to propose an integrated conceptual framework based on input from both individuals with SCI and their clinical providers. This framework will serve as a guide for the development of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure specifically related to BPD. DESIGN: Three focus groups with individuals with SCI and 3 groups with SCI providers were analyzed using grounded-theory based qualitative analysis to ascertain how blood pressure impacts health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in individuals with SCI. SETTING: Focus groups were conducted at 2 Veterans Affairs medical centers and a research center. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (n=27) in 3 focus groups and clinical providers (n=25) in 3 focus groups. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis indicated that all focus groups spent the highest percentage of time discussing symptoms of BPD (39%), followed by precipitators/causes of BPD (16%), preventative actions (15%), corrective actions (12%), and the impact that BPD has on social or emotional functioning (8%). While patient/consumer focus groups and provider focus groups raised similar issues, providers spent more time discussing precipitators/causes of BPD and preventative actions (38%) than patient/consumer groups (24%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that BPD uniquely and adversely impacts HRQOL in persons with SCI. While both individuals with SCI and their providers highlighted the relevant symptoms of BPD, the SCI providers offered additional detailed information regarding the precipitators/causes and what can be done to prevent/treat BPD. Further, the results suggest that persons with SCI are aware of how BPD impacts their HRQOL and are able to distinguish between subtle signs and symptoms. These findings exemplify the need for a validated and sensitive clinical measurement tool that can assess the extent to which BPD impacts HRQOL in patients with SCI.

Increased presence of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients in the absence of neurological events.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cognitive impairment (CI) is highly prevalent among hemodialysis (HD) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim was to compare cognitive function in HD patients with no history of stroke or dementia and well-matched controls. Studies are required to determine the impact of HD and chronic kidney disease-specific risks on CI. METHODS: 76 outpatients (50 receiving outpatient HD and 26 with normal kidney function matched for age and comorbidity) underwent a cross-sectional observational study. HD patients were well dialyzed and had optimal hemoglobin levels. A battery of eight neuropsychological tests was used. Outcomes included assessment scores of neurocognitive testing and prevalence and subtype of CI. RESULTS: Compared to controls, HD subjects had significantly lower composite scores for each tested cognitive domain. In each domain except memory, the percentage of subjects with impairment was significantly higher in HD subjects than controls. Differences between the groups were independent of vascular and dementia risk factors. 82% of HD subjects met criteria for CI versus 50% of controls. Non-amnestic subtype of CI was more prevalent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Well-dialyzed HD patients with optimized hemoglobin levels and with no history of stroke or dementia performed significantly worse on multiple measures of cognition compared to controls. A higher prevalence of non-memory impairment may suggest an underlying vascular versus neurodegenerative mechanism. HD and chronic kidney disease-specific risk factors may contribute to early CI not readily detected by routine screening methods.