A comparison of sodium fusidate ointment and mupirocin ointment in superficial skin sepsis.

Sodium fusidate ointment and mupirocin ointment were compared in 354 patients with superficial skin sepsis. The ointments were applied 3-times daily, or once daily when covered by a dressing, and the response assessed after 6 to 8 days. Both preparations proved effective clinically with 86% of patients responding. There was no difference between the two preparations in cases of primary infection (85% to both ointments), including a sub-group with impetigo (sodium fusidate 88% and mupirocin 84%), or secondary infection (sodium fusidate 81% and mupirocin 89%). Sodium fusidate ointment (98%) was significantly better (p less than 0.05) than mupirocin (82%) in patients with other superficial infections. Both ointments were equally effective in cases where Gram-positive, Gram-negative or mixed Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria were isolated. Adverse effects were reported in 1.0% of patients using sodium fusidate ointment and in 7.4% of patients using mupirocin ointment. The majority of complaints concerned the greasiness of mupirocin ointment.

Zimelidine: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness.

Zimelidine is a new antidepressant, which is structurally unrelated to the tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants. The pharmacological profile of zimelidine is different to that of other antidepressants in that it appears to owe the major part of its activity to the inhibition of serotonin uptake within the central nervous system. It appears that the demethylated metabolite, norzimelidine, may be responsible for most of the pharmacological activity. Studies to date suggest that zimelidine has overall efficacy comparable with that of amitriptyline, desipramine, maprotiline and doxepin in depressive illness, but at dosages which have achieved a similar overall clinical improvement zimelidine does not cause sedation, and anticholinergic side effects are mild and occur infrequently. Preliminary evidence suggests that zimelidine is effective against concomitant anxiety in depressed patients, and that it may also be useful in treating phobic anxiety. Zimelidine appears less likely to cause serious cardiotoxicity, in therapeutic dosages or an overdosage, than the tricyclic antidepressants, but it has not been studied in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sleep disturbance has occurred significantly more frequently during zimelidine therapy than during therapy with other sedative antidepressants, but whether this simply reflects the absence of sedation with zimelidine, or an effect on sleep as such, is presently unclear. Zimelidine appears to be effective and well tolerated in elderly patients. Thus, some aspects of the drug's profile (e.g. apparent low incidence of anticholinergic effects or drowsiness) may offer potential advantages in some patients; however, clinical experience with zimelidine to date has been limited, and further well designed studies are required to define the role of the drug more clearly in treating depressive illness compared with other antidepressants, and particularly to define whether some types of depression may respond more readily to zimelidine than to other antidepressants.

Zomepirac: a review of its pharmacological properties and analgesic efficacy.

Zomepirac is an analgesic which is closely related chemically to the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, tolmetin. In short term studies mainly involving patients with acute pain of moderately severity, zomepirac was at least as effective as usual therapeutic doses of aspirin, codeine alone or with aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine, dextropropoxyphene with paracetamol, or orally administered pentazocine. Additionally, zomepirac may provide analgesia comparable to that with standard doses of intramuscular morphine in patients with acute pain of moderate intensity, but in severe pain states strong analgesics may be more appropriate. Zomepirac has also been studied in patients with chronic orthopaedic pain or osteoarthritic pain for up to several months, without the need for increased doses. It appears to be at least as effective as usual doses of aspirin when used in this way, with a lower incidence of some side effects such as gastrointestinal disturbances and hearing disorders. Preliminary studies suggest that zomepirac may also be effective in patients with chronic cancer pain who have not been previously maintained on strong analgesics, but further experience is needed to clarify its usefulness in this difficult treatment area.

Cefoperazone: A review of its in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Cefoperazone is a new 'third generation' semisynthetic injectable cephalosporin. It has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity which includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa (unlike older cephalosporins), along with the Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. Unlike other cephalosporins, cefoperazone is excreted to a considerable extent by extrarenal mechanisms. Given by intravenous or intramuscular injection, cefoperazone is effective against a wide variety of infections caused by Gram-negative or Gram-positive aerobes, including infections of the biliary tract, and in many anaerobic infections. It is generally well tolerated, diarrhoea and skin rashes being the most frequently reported side effects.

Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use.

Clavulanic acid is a beta-lactamase inhibitor produced from Streptomyces clavuligerus, which when combined with certain beta-lactam antibiotics extends their activity against bacteria which owe their resistance to the production of beta-lacatamases. In combination with amoxycillin it extends the antibacterial activity of amoxycillin to include beta-lactamase-producing strains, which are otherwise resistant, as well as amoxycillin-resistant species such as Bacteroides fragilis. The addition of clavulanic acid to amoxycillin occasionally extends (but does not decrease) the susceptibility of amoxycillin-sensitive bacteria. Clavulanic acid is adequately absorbed after oral administration and its basic pharmacokinetic characteristics are similar to those of amoxycillin. Preliminary therapeutic trials suggest that amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid is effective in urinary tract infections caused by amoxycillin-resistant organisms and in lower respiratory tract infections unresponsive to previous routine antibiotic therapy, in hospitalised patients. It is generally well tolerated; nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and skin rash being the most frequently reported adverse effects.