First Experiences with Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids for Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss: A Case Report.

This patient case report describes a first experience in late 2022 and early 2023 with over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for a 71-year-old male with self-perceived, age-related hearing loss. The patient reported no "red flag" medical conditions that would preclude him from safely using an OTC hearing aid device. After also meeting inclusionary criteria required to be printed on the device label, the patient was offered FDA registered OTC hearing aids. The first device pair was returned due to malfunction. The second device pair was an in-the-canal style, black in color, and powered by disposable batteries. He required help setting up the device from his spouse, an audiologist, and a pharmacist. Improved scores on the Self-Assessment of Communication and Significant Other Assessment of Communication were noted from the patient and his spouse. The patient continued to use the second device pair for 6 months after first use with no additional help. Our experience supports the pharmacist's role in identifying appropriate candidates for OTC hearing aids, helping patients select a device, and supporting device setup and self-fitting processes at community pharmacies. Further experiences are needed to demonstrate how pharmacists can support OTC hearing aid purchases at community pharmacies.

National Survey of Pharmacist Awareness, Interest, and Readiness for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

Hearing loss is a major public health concern, affecting over 30 million Americans. Few adults who could benefit from hearing aids use them. Hearing aids are now available over-the-counter (OTC) for persons with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Community pharmacies will sell OTC hearing aids to increase public access to hearing healthcare. The purpose of this study was to describe pharmacist awareness, interest, and readiness to offer OTC hearing aids at community pharmacies. A multiple-item online survey was designed using the Theory of Planned Behavior and responses were collected from licensed pharmacists from July 2021 to December 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the 97 responses collected. Most respondents were not aware of the upcoming OTC hearing aid availability. Most respondents were somewhat or very interested in increasing their knowledge on OTC hearing aids, selling OTC hearing aids, and assisting patients with OTC hearing aid selection. Most respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed that they had the necessary knowledge to counsel patients on OTC hearing aids. The most reported supporting factor was training and educational resources. OTC hearing aids are a unique public health initiative which will expand patient access to hearing health care to community pharmacies.

OTC hearing aids: An opportunity for collaborative working relationships between pharmacists and audiologists.

In 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration Reauthorization Act created a new category of hearing aids to be sold over the counter (OTC), disrupting how nearly 30 million persons with hearing loss will seek and purchase hearing aids. Laws and regulations do not require a medical evaluation or an appointment with an audiologist prior to purchasing OTC hearing aids. However, it is likely that patients will approach pharmacists with questions about OTC hearing aids when considering these devices available at the community pharmacy. The objective of this commentary is to discuss the opportunity for collaborative working relationships between pharmacists and audiologists in the context of OTC hearing aids. The most relevant barriers to pharmacist/audiologist collaboration are turf concerns, lack of trust, and distance between practice sites. OTC hearing aids can positively impact hearing health care across the nation with successful collaboration between the professions of pharmacy and audiology.

Alternative Designs for Testing Speech, Language, and Hearing Interventions: Cluster-Randomized Trials and Stepped-Wedge Designs.

PURPOSE: Individual-randomized trials are the gold standard for testing the efficacy and effectiveness of drugs, devices, and behavioral interventions. Health care delivery, educational, and programmatic interventions are often complex, involving multiple levels of change and measurement precluding individual randomization for testing. Cluster-randomized trials and cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trials are alternatives where the intervention is allocated at the group level, such as a clinic or a school, and the outcomes are measured at the person level. These designs are introduced along with the statistical implications of similarities among individuals within the same cluster. We also illustrate the parameters that have the most impact on the likelihood of detecting intervention effects, which must be considered when planning these trials. CONCLUSION: Cluster-randomized and stepped-wedge designs should be considered by researchers as experimental alternatives to individual-randomized trials when testing speech, language, and hearing care interventions in real-world settings.

Pharmacist competencies for over-the-counter hearing aids: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The 2017 Food and Drug Administration Reauthorization Act established a new category of hearing aids to be available over the counter to increase accessibility and affordability of hearing aid devices. To prepare for increased consumer demand, pharmacists must be ready to meet the needs of the millions of adults eligible to seek over-the-counter hearing aids at the community pharmacy. To date, no organization has proposed competency statements to describe a pharmacist with the knowledge, skills, and abilities aligning with safe and effective use of over-the-counter hearing aids to be sold at community pharmacies. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to establish competencies needed for pharmacists to safely and effectively assist patients seeking over-the-counter hearing aids at the community pharmacy. METHODS: The Delphi technique was selected to achieve group consensus for competency statements. The project began with a kickoff meeting in July 2019 and continued with a brainstorming round followed by 3 rounds of surveys ending in March 2020. Each survey presented competency statements for panelists to review, rate their agreement, and offer revisions. Statements that reached consensus to accept (≥80% agreement) were advanced to the final list. Statements that did not reach consensus were advanced to subsequent survey rounds. RESULTS: A total of 14 individuals representing pharmacy, audiology, hearing aid manufacturers, and persons with hearing loss participated. In total, 26 competency statements were accepted by consensus, 2 statements were rejected by consensus, and 11 statements did not reach consensus. All 26 accepted statements were mapped to the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process before final approval by the stakeholder panel. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists will likely play new interprofessional roles in the delivery of hearing health care as over-the-counter hearing aids come to market. With professional competency statements, pharmacists will have a framework for the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to safely assist patients seeking over-the-counter hearing aids at the community pharmacy.

Smartphones and Hearing Loss: There's an App for That!

Smartphone use has become increasingly prevalent and patients are frequently using this technology to engage in health-related activities. There are a variety of smartphone applications that can be used to assist individuals with hearing loss, particularly during extreme situations such as a global pandemic which results in restricted face-to-face interactions. The hearing-related applications can be divided into four categories: (1) screening and assessment, (2) intervention and rehabilitation, (3) education and information, and (4) assistive tools. Several subcategories of applications in the assistive tools category are described that may be of interest to individuals with hearing loss, whether they wear hearing aids or not. Examples of the apps along with links are included for each subcategory.

Hearing Loss and Communication Among Hospitalized Older Adults: Prevalence and Recognition.

The current quality improvement study aimed to determine hearing loss (HL) prevalence in older adult patients in a large urban hospital, and the success of current processes to identify its presence during routine admission procedures. Predictors of HL were also evaluated, with the goal of identifying risk factors that might help staff anticipate patient communication challenges. A sample of 162 newly admitted patients, age 70 and older, participated in a hearing/communication assessment that included audiometry and an informal self-report measure about hearing difficulty. Chart review was conducted to assess whether patients with confirmed hearing/communication deficits had been identified as such during the admission or nursing assessments. Results revealed a high prevalence of HL (72.8%) and relatively low sensitivity of routine admission procedures in identifying this communication deficit (14.4% to 43.2%). Age and male gender were found to be predictors of HL. The invisibility of HL poses a challenge to nurses in recognizing when older adult patients are at risk for communication breakdowns. Communication breakdowns associated with HL can potentially impact patients' adherence to treatment plans. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(6), 34-42.].

Providing Hearing Education and Resources for Underserved Populations (HEAR-UP) in our Local Neighborhoods.

Healthcare services in the United States are difficult to access for at least 10% of our population. Moreover, hearing healthcare services, including hearing aids, are largely inaccessible even for those individuals who may have health insurance and access to healthcare. Humanitarian audiology has been recognized as a means of supplying hearing services and devices to underserved populations around the globe. However, little has been publicized about humanitarian audiology projects taking place in local communities within the United States. This article describes one such project that has been in place in Pittsburgh, PA, for the past 4 years. This service results from collaboration across a collection of healthcare, community service, charitable, and educational organizations. The resources necessary to create similarly sourced services in other U.S. locations are described. Challenges and solutions for this local form of humanitarian audiology are discussed.

What's in Your Teaching Toolbox?

Educators are faced with an array of tools available to enhance learning outcomes in the classroom and clinic. These tools range from those that are very simple to those that are sufficiently complex to require an investment in learning time. This article summarizes a collection of teaching tools, ordered by the time involved in learning proficient use. Simple tools described include specific online blogs providing support for faculty and student writing and a simple method to capture and download videos from YouTube for classroom use. More complex tools described include a Web-based application for custom-created animated videos and an interactive audience polling system. Readers are encouraged to reflect on the tools most appropriate for use in their own teaching toolbox by considering the requisite time to proficiency and suitability to address desired learner outcomes.

Hearing and Health Outcomes: Recognizing and Addressing Hearing Loss in Hospitalized Older Adults.

As age increases, the prevalence of hearing loss significantly increases, reaching up to 89% of those 80 years and older. Hearing loss in older patients is often unrecognized and its consequences are often underappreciated. Hearing loss can interfere with the ability to exchange important health information and to participate in health care decision-making. Hearing loss during hospitalization increases the risk of misdiagnosis. There is a lack of empirical data regarding prevalence and recognition of hearing loss in hospitalized older adults. In this article, we describe a variety of negative outcomes that may result when older inpatients are functioning with unrecognized hearing loss.

An evidence-based guide to clinical instruction in audiology.

BACKGROUND: A significant portion of the AuD curriculum occurs in clinical settings outside the classroom. Expert clinicians, employed within and outside of the university, are called upon to provide this clinical education. Most have had little or no formal training in clinical teaching yet face pedagogical and logistical challenges when simultaneously providing clinical service and teaching. Training to provide optimal methods and approaches to clinical instruction should be based on research evidence; however, there is a paucity of research in this area within the audiology discipline. PURPOSE: This article provides a review of literature supplying evidence for important concepts, elements, and approaches to the clinical instruction process. Additionally, we provide readers with some practical tools with which to facilitate application of optimal clinical teaching principles. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of literature on clinical education in audiology and across a wide array of health professions. Through the use of content analysis we identified four elements of the clinical teaching process most critical in examining optimal practices. RESULTS: The elements identified as critical to positive clinical learning outcomes include the establishment of mutual expectations and goals; structured content and delivery of feedback; establishment of a positive instructor/student relationship; and questioning strategies that lead to the development of critical thinking skills. CONCLUSIONS: Many disciplines outside of audiology demonstrate robust research activity related to understanding and optimizing the clinical education process. The application of a number of evidence-based clinical teaching principles should allow us to improve student outcomes in audiology. Researchers in our field might consider if and how we should develop our own research literature in clinical education.