ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: We investigated the cross-neutralising potential of serum and nasal wash samples from volunteers who were intranasally immunised once with a monovalent replication-deficient delNS1-H1N1 influenza virus vaccine (7.7log10TCID50/volunteer). Eight out of twelve (8/12) vaccinees responded to vaccination with a significant increase of antibody levels in serum IgG ELISA, mucosal IgA ELISA, MNA or HAI. Four responders showed delNS1-specific ELISA IgA increases and revealed excellent homosubtypic neutralising activity in serum and mucosal washings (4/4). However, 0/4 of the sera but 3/4 of the nasal washings neutralised also heterosubtypic H3N2 and H5N1 influenza viruses. Depletion experiments proved that IgA but not IgG is responsible for the cross-neutralising activity of the nasal wash sample. Our findings indicate that the induction of virus-neutralising IgA may represent a valuable correlate of cross-protection of intranasal influenza vaccines and that the delNS1 concept constitutes a promising approach to protect humans from seasonal and pandemic influenza threats. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00724997.
Subject(s)
Immunity, Mucosal , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cross Protection , Double-Blind Method , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Neutralization Tests , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) is universally regarded as the gold standard in influenza virus serology. Nevertheless, difficulties in titre readouts are common and interlaboratory variations are frequently reported. OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated the modified HAI to facilitate reliable, accurate and reproducible analysis of sera derived from influenza vaccination studies. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and preclinical serum samples, NIBSC reference sera and seasonal influenza virus type A (H1N1 and H3N2) and type B antigens were employed to validate the mHAI. Moreover, pandemic virus strains (H5N1 and H1N1pdm09) were used to prove assay robustness. RESULTS: Utilisation of a 0.08% solution of stabilised human erythrocytes, assay buffer containing bovine serum albumin and microscopical plate readout are the major differences between the modified and standard HAI assay protocols. Validation experiments revealed that the mHAI is linear, specific and up to eightfold more sensitive than the standard HAI. In 95.6% of all measurements mHAI titres were precisely measured irrespective of the assay day, run or operator. Moreover, 96.4% (H1N1) or 95.2% (H3N2 and B), respectively, of all serum samples were determined within one dilution step of the nominal values for spiked samples. Finally, the mHAI results remained unaffected by variations in virus antigens, erythrocytes, reagents, laboratory location, sample storage conditions or matrix components. CONCLUSION: The modified HAI is easy to analyse, requires only a single source of erythrocytes and allows utilisation of numerous influenza virus antigens, also including virus strains which are difficult to handle by the standard HAI (e.g. H3N2, H5N1 and H1N1pdm09).
