Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
BJU Int ; 108(3): 388-94, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21631695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: • To assess the efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, 12-month, parallel-group study. • Men aged ≥ 50 years with a clinical diagnosis of BPH received once-daily treatment with dutasteride 0.5 mg (n= 813) or finasteride 5 mg (n= 817). After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive dutasteride or finasteride for 48 weeks, followed by an optional 24-month, open-label phase, during which patients received dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily. • The primary endpoint was change in prostate volume, and the secondary endpoints included improvement in American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) scores, improvement in maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) and long-term safety in the 24-month open-label phase. RESULTS: • Both dutasteride and finasteride were effective at reducing prostate volume with no significant difference between the two treatments during the study. • Similar reductions in mean AUA-SI scores and Q(max) were also observed for men in both treatment groups. • A similar percentage of adverse events was experienced by patients of both treatment groups, and no new adverse events were reported in the open-label phase. CONCLUSION: • Dutasteride and finasteride, when administered for 12 months, were similarly effective in reducing prostate volume and improving Q(max) and urinary symptoms associated with BPH in men with an enlarged prostate.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Finasteride/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Dutasteride , Gynecomastia/chemically induced , Humans , Hypertension/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
2.
BJU Int ; 107(6): 946-54, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21332630

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: • To investigate the influence of baseline variables on the 4-year incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery and overall clinical progression in men treated with tamsulosin, dutasteride, or a combination of both. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The 4-year Combination of Avodart® and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of clinical outcomes in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptomatic (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]≥ 12) BPH, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of ≥ 1.5 ng/mL and ≤ 10 ng/mL, and a prostate volume (PV) of ≥ 30 mL. • Eligible patients received tamsulosin 0.4 mg, dutasteride 0.5 mg, or a combination of both. • The primary endpoint was time to first AUR or BPH-related surgery. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression of BPH and symptoms. Posthoc analyses of the influence of baseline variables (including age, IPSS health-related quality of life [HRQL], PV, PSA, IPSS, peak urinary flow rate [Q(max) ] and body-mass index [BMI]) on the incidence of AUR or BPH-related surgery, clinical progression of BPH, and symptoms were performed. RESULTS: • There were 4844 men in the intent-to-treat population. Overall baseline characteristics were similar across all patient groups. • Regardless of baseline subgroup, the incidence of AUR or BPH-related surgery was higher in men treated with tamsulosin than in those treated with dutasteride or combined therapy. • Combined therapy was statistically better than tamsulosin in reducing the risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery in subgroups of baseline PV > 42.0 mL, in all subgroups of baseline PSA level, and all other baseline subgroups (P ≤ 0.001). • Across treatment groups, the incidence of clinical progression was highest in men with a baseline IPSS of < 20 or IPSS HRQL score of < 4. The incidence of clinical progression was also higher in men receiving tamsulosin than dutasteride or combined therapy in all baseline subgroups, except for men with a baseline PV of < 40 mL. Combined therapy reduced the relative risk (RR) of clinical progression compared with tamsulosin across all baseline subgroups and compared with dutasteride across most baseline subgroups. • Symptom deterioration was the most common progression event in each treatment group regardless of baseline subgroup, except in those men with an IPSS of ≥ 20 at baseline. Combined therapy reduced the RR of symptom deterioration compared with tamsulosin across all but one baseline subgroup (the reduction was not significant for men with a baseline PV of < 40 mL) and compared with dutasteride in most subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: • Men with a baseline PV of ≥ 40 mL and any baseline PSA level of ≥1.5 ng/mL had greater reductions in the RR of AUR or BPH-related surgery and greater reductions in the RR of clinical progression and symptom deterioration on combined therapy or dutasteride monotherapy than on tamsulosin monotherapy. • These analyses support the long-term use of combined therapy with dutasteride plus tamsulosin in men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms and a slightly enlarged prostate.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Urinary Retention/drug therapy , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Dutasteride , Epidemiologic Methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Tamsulosin , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/surgery
3.
Eur Urol ; 57(1): 123-31, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19825505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin provides significantly greater benefit than either monotherapy for various patient-reported outcomes in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic enlargement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combination therapy is more effective than either monotherapy in reducing the relative risk for acute urinary retention (AUR), BPH-related surgery, and BPH clinical progression over 4 yr in men at increased risk of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study was a 4-yr, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study in 4844 men > or =50 yr of age with a clinical diagnosis of BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score > or =12, prostate volume > or =30 cm(3), prostate-specific antigen 1.5-10 ng/ml, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) >5 and < or =15 ml/s with minimum voided volume > or =125 ml. INTERVENTION: Oral daily tamsulosin, 0.4 mg; dutasteride, 0.5 mg; or a combination of both. MEASUREMENTS: The 4-yr primary end point was time to first AUR or BPH-related surgery. Secondary end points included BPH clinical progression, symptoms, Q(max), prostate volume, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Combination therapy was significantly superior to tamsulosin monotherapy but not dutasteride monotherapy at reducing the relative risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery. Combination therapy was also significantly superior to both monotherapies at reducing the relative risk of BPH clinical progression. Combination therapy provided significantly greater symptom benefit than either monotherapy at 4 yr. Safety and tolerability of combination therapy was consistent with previous experience with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapies, with the exception of an imbalance in the composite term of cardiac failure among the three study arms. The lack of placebo control is a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-yr CombAT data provide support for the long-term use of dutasteride and tamsulosin combination therapy in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH and prostatic enlargement. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00090103 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00090103).


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects , Aged , Azasteroids/adverse effects , Brazil , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dutasteride , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Italy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , North America , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Tamsulosin , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Retention/drug therapy , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
5.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 7: 55, 2009 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19545384

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to validate the US English Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM) questionnaire, which measures patient satisfaction with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) treatment and was administered to men with BPH lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) enrolled in a multi-national clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe BPH symptoms completed three disease-specific measures: The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the BPH Impact Index (BII) and the PPSM, at baseline (after completion of the placebo run-in period) and at every 13-week clinic visit thereafter for the duration of the study treatment period. The PPSM was analysed to assess its variability, reliability and validity. RESULTS: There were 879 patients included in the analyses, with a mean age of 66.7 years. The PPSM was found to comprise two factors - PPSM-Global and PPSM-Pain, with a Total Score ranging from 7 to 49. It demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from .95 to .97) and also demonstrated convergent validity through significant correlations with the IPSS (.48 to .58), IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) item (.41 to .63) and BII (.31 to .45) and known-groups validity against the IPSS, IPSS QoL item and BII. CONCLUSION: Results support the use of the PPSM as a measure of satisfaction in BPH patient groups.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia/psychology , Psychometrics/standards , Quality of Life , Urinary Retention/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/classification , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , United States , Urinary Retention/drug therapy , Urinary Retention/etiology
6.
BJU Int ; 103(7): 919-26, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19239460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of dutasteride and tamsulosin as combined therapy compared with each monotherapy for improving patient-reported health outcomes in men with moderate-to-severe urinary symptoms and prostate enlargement, reporting the pre-planned 2-year analyses from the CombAT trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CombAT study is an ongoing, international, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial. Men aged >or=50 years with a clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of >or=12 units, a prostate volume of >or=30 mL, a total serum prostate-specific antigen level of 1.5-10 ng/mL and a peak urinary flow of >5 and or=125 mL, were randomized to receive 0.5 mg dutasteride, 0.4 mg tamsulosin or the combination once daily for 4 years. Symptoms were assessed every 3 months. The primary endpoint at 2 years was the change in IPSS from baseline. Secondary endpoints included various measures of health outcomes, which included the BPH Impact Index (BII), IPSS Question 8 (Q8), and the Patient Perception of Study Medication (PPSM) questionnaire. RESULTS: Combined therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in BII and IPSS Q8 from baseline than did dutasteride from 3 months and compared with tamsulosin from 9 months (BII) or 12 months (IPSS Q8). Assessments using the PPSM questionnaire showed that a significantly higher proportion of patients were satisfied with and would request dutasteride and tamsulosin combined therapy than with each monotherapy at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride and tamsulosin combined therapy provides significantly greater improvements in patient-reported quality of life and treatment satisfaction than both monotherapies at 2 years, following the trends for clinical improvements in symptom scores and peak urinary flow rates, in men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms.


Subject(s)
Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Patient Satisfaction , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Prostatism/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dutasteride , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatism/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tamsulosin , Treatment Outcome , Urodynamics
7.
J Urol ; 179(2): 616-21; discussion 621, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18082216

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We investigated whether combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin is more effective than either monotherapy alone for improving symptoms and long-term outcomes in men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement (30 cc or greater). We report preplanned 2-year analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CombAT study is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Men 50 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia, International Prostate Symptom Score 12 points or greater, prostate volume 30 cc or greater, total serum prostate specific antigen 1.5 ng/ml or greater to 10 ng/ml or less and peak urinary flow greater than 5 to 15 ml per second or less with a minimum voided volume of 125 ml or greater were randomized to 0.5 mg dutasteride, 0.4 mg tamsulosin or the combination once daily for 4 years. Symptoms were assessed every 3 months and peak urinary flow was assessed every 6 months. The primary end point at 2 years was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score from baseline. RESULTS: Combination therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in symptoms vs dutasteride from month 3 and tamsulosin from month 9, and in benign prostatic hyperplasia related health status from months 3 and 12, respectively. There was a significantly greater improvement from baseline in peak urinary flow for combination therapy vs dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapies from month 6. There was a significant increase in drug related adverse events with combination therapy vs monotherapies, although most did not result in the cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate enlargement (30 cc or greater) combination therapy provides a significantly greater degree of benefit than tamsulosin or dutasteride monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Azasteroids/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Urination Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dutasteride , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/physiopathology , Tamsulosin , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urination Disorders/etiology , Urination Disorders/physiopathology
8.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 28(6): 770-9, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17761460

ABSTRACT

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent condition in aging men, which can be progressive and lead to acute urinary retention (AUR) and the need for surgery. It is commonly treated with alpha-blockers and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), both of which improve the symptoms of BPH. Long-term treatment with 5ARIs can also reduce the risk of developing AUR and the need for surgery. The landmark Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) trial demonstrated that over 4 years the combination of the type 2-specific 5ARI, finasteride and the alpha-blocker doxazosin was more effective than either agent alone in reducing overall clinical progression. Since the initiation of MTOPS, it has been shown that patients with larger prostates and higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are at greater risk of BPH progression, and are therefore arguably more likely to benefit from combination therapy. The Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) trial is a 4-year, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study designed to investigate the benefits of combination therapy with the dual 5ARI dutasteride and the alpha-blocker tamsulosin compared with each monotherapy in improving symptoms and long-term outcomes in men with moderate-to-severe symptoms of BPH and prostate enlargement. Symptoms and long-term outcomes (AUR and surgery) will be assessed as separate primary endpoints at 2 and 4 years, respectively. Eligible patients were at least 50 years old with prostate volume > or =30 cm(3) and PSA level > or =1.5 ng/mL. A total of 4838 subjects have been enrolled. This paper describes the rationale, design and baseline data of the CombAT study.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Azasteroids/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dutasteride , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/classification , Research Design , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Tamsulosin
9.
BJU Int ; 99(3): 587-94, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17407516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pretreatment with dutasteride, a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI), reduces surgical blood loss or postoperative complications in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who undergo transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre study comprised 214 patients with BPH. Placebo was compared with dutasteride 0.5 mg/day 2 weeks before and after TURP, or 4 weeks before and 2 weeks after TURP. Surgical blood loss was measured using a haemoglobin photometer (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden) and postoperative adverse events were recorded. Microvessel density (MVD) was calculated by immunostaining and light microscopy of the prostatic chips. RESULTS: Although dutasteride reduced serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by 86-89% in 2-4 weeks, and intraprostatic DHT was approximately 10 times lower than in the placebo group, the (adjusted) mean haemoglobin (Hb) loss during surgery was 2.15-2.55 g Hb/g resectate with no significant difference in blood loss between the groups either during or after TURP. Clot retention occurred in 6-11% and urinary incontinence in 14-15% of patients during the 14 weeks after TURP, with no difference between the groups. The MVD at TURP was also similar for all groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant reductions in blood loss during or after TURP or complications afterward with dutasteride compared with placebo, despite significant suppression of intraprostatic DHT. Blood loss and transfusion rates in the placebo group were lower than those previously reported in studies where there was a beneficial effect of a 5ARI, relative to placebo, on bleeding during TURP.


Subject(s)
Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Dutasteride , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 89(5): 2179-84, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15126539

ABSTRACT

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is the primary metabolite of testosterone in the prostate and skin. Testosterone is converted to DHT by 5alpha-reductase, which exists in two isoenzyme forms (types 1 and 2). DHT is associated with development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and reduction in its level with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors improves the symptoms associated with BPH and reduces the risk of acute urinary retention and prostate surgery. A selective inhibitor of the type 2 isoenzyme (finasteride) has been shown to decrease serum DHT by about 70%. We hypothesized that inhibition of both isoenzymes with the dual inhibitor dutasteride would more effectively suppress serum DHT levels than selective inhibition of only the type 2 isoenzyme. A total of 399 patients with BPH were randomized to receive once-daily dosing for 24 wk of dutasteride (0.01, 0.05, 0.5, 2.5, or 5.0 mg), 5 mg finasteride, or placebo. The mean percent decrease in DHT was 98.4 +/- 1.2% with 5.0 mg dutasteride and 94.7 +/- 3.3% with 0.5 mg dutasteride, significantly lower (P < 0.001) and with less variability than the 70.8 +/- 18.3% suppression observed with 5 mg finasteride. Mean testosterone levels increased but remained in the normal range for all treatment groups. Dutasteride appeared to be well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to placebo.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgens/metabolism , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Cholestenone 5 alpha-Reductase/antagonists & inhibitors , Dihydrotestosterone/antagonists & inhibitors , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/blood , Azasteroids/administration & dosage , Azasteroids/adverse effects , Azasteroids/blood , Dihydrotestosterone/blood , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Dutasteride , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/blood , Humans , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Osmolar Concentration , Testosterone/blood
11.
Urology ; 63(4): 709-15, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15072886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of dutasteride, a dual type 1 and type 2 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and associated lower urinary tract symptoms. METHODS: Data from two Phase IIIa multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of 2-year duration plus a 2-year open-label extension were pooled and analyzed. The entry criteria included age 50 years old or older, clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate volume of 30 cm3 or greater, American Urological Association symptom score of 12 or greater, peak urinary flow rate of 15 mL/s or less, and prostate-specific antigen level of 1.5 ng/mL or greater but less than 10 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 2802 men were randomized into the double-blind phase of the two studies with 1908 patients (68%) completing the study. Of these, 1570 subjects were enrolled in the open-label phase, and 569 subjects received dutasteride for 48 months. Changes at the 48-month visit for dutasteride/dutasteride-treated subjects included improvement in prostate volume (-26.2%), American Urological Association Symptom Index (-6.1 points), and peak urinary flow rate (+2.8 mL/s). Changes for the placebo/dutasteride group included prostate volume (-20.7%), American Urological Association Symptom Index (-5.3 points), and peak urinary flow rate (+1.8 mL/s). Acute urinary retention and surgery occurred in a small percentage of subjects (less than 2% and less than 1%) in the open-label extension phase. Dutasteride was well tolerated with no statistically significant increase in drug-related adverse events during the open-label extension and no adverse laboratory trends. CONCLUSIONS: Dual inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase with dutasteride provided sustained efficacy in subjects with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia treated for 48 months. Near-complete, long-term suppression of dihydrotestosterone (93% at 48 months) with dutasteride did not lead to an increase in adverse events compared with that reported in the 2-year period.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Aged , Azasteroids/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Dutasteride , Ejaculation/drug effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Erectile Dysfunction/chemically induced , Gynecomastia/chemically induced , Humans , Isoenzymes/antagonists & inhibitors , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/drug effects , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Urodynamics/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...